Jump to content

Recommended Posts

When leaflet for solar panels from the mayor's office came through the door I decided to register my interest. Mayor Khan explained that once Londoners had signed up (with no obligation to proceed), he would send it out to tender. The company called Green Energy Together was awarded the contract. I have a small 3 bed and the cost of panels plus battery came to about ?6.5k. The battery cost came to almost half of the cost but you don't have to included it in the package. Anyway I went ahead with it and the installation all went swimmingly. There was a bit of a delay on the admin side getting the paperwork together but it all came good in the end. It was installed just before Christmas and I didn't see much production in winter. However, to give you some idea I've just checked total production and consumption for the month of May. Consumption 4.12kwh, Production 3.10 kwh. Bear in mind that we are home a lot, so Tele, lights, kettle going most of the day and also all electric cooking. My biggest bugbear is not being able to connect it to the grid yet because we can't get our smart meter converted, despite waiting 2 years.....but that's another story.
It's good that you had a positive experience as so many were dismissive if this scheme including a thread on this forum. It should also add value to the property. Our issue is that they would have to go on the front of the house. If people have issues with pay back on solar panels, you should look at grey water and rain water recycling. Can cost 10s of 1000s

So? I expect it didn't meet planning law/framework. If the decision was wrong then they could get it overturned by the planning inspectorate. If it was not in the approved application but was ok in principle then permission may have been granted retrospectively


More importantly do you have a view on the original question? I did.


You won't be the only person here who has an issue with Southwark but there are other threads you can join in.

I had 7 panels installed by Green Energy Together in March 2022. Customer service, communication, installation date scheduling,have all been appalling.

I am still waiting for a battery, without which I cannot export any excess energy to the grid.

I cannot recommend this company.

h3+ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Were these quotes done recently? With the massive

> increase in power prices and rise of WFH (it's

> better to use the power than sell it to the grid)

> i believe the payback period can be around 8 years



The quotes were in April this year. Definitely not cost effective. With payback in 20 years, there are no savings to be made.

Lebanums Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> h3+ Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Were these quotes done recently? With the

> massive

> > increase in power prices and rise of WFH (it's

> > better to use the power than sell it to the

> grid)

> > i believe the payback period can be around 8

> years

>

>

> The quotes were in April this year. Definitely not

> cost effective. With payback in 20 years, there

> are no savings to be made.


You might be able to check if they used the new price cap rate if its mentioned on your quote. The new rate is around 28.34p per kwh compared to 20.8p per kWh. It looks like it might be getting closer to 40p per kwh from Oct

I expect this market was helped by government subsidies which always ends up with some shysters getting involved. Always helpful for good and bad comments about contractors on a suitable forum - trust a trader, trade associations and the like. General rule in any service is see whether they are a trade association member and if there is a code of practice. Sadly since austerity government tends not to get involved and local authorities have slashed trading standards teams. Ultimately you can go to court which I did once years ago and they settled rather than challenged. Of course you should complain to the company first.


A little off piste but don't let one shoddy company put you off. I would have thought that solar panels added to the value of property. The Archer family are fitting them to their milking shed in Ambridge in the West Midlands.

louisemurray Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My experience with them is an ongoing nightmare.

> No response to emails, only respond and promise

> but dont deliver when you get through after a

> lengthy wait.

>

> All I can say is lucky you.



Have you tried posting a review on their Facebook page? They seem to reply quite quickly to negative comments

h3+ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lebanums Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > h3+ Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Were these quotes done recently? With the

> > massive

> > > increase in power prices and rise of WFH

> (it's

> > > better to use the power than sell it to the

> > grid)

> > > i believe the payback period can be around 8

> > years

> >

> >

> > The quotes were in April this year. Definitely

> not

> > cost effective. With payback in 20 years, there

> > are no savings to be made.

>

> You might be able to check if they used the new

> price cap rate if its mentioned on your quote. The

> new rate is around 28.34p per kwh compared to

> 20.8p per kWh. It looks like it might be getting

> closer to 40p per kwh from Oct


The new rate was used. I will never make my money back whilst living in my current house. I have 0 interest in pursuing this until the cost comes down. Also investigated a heat pump, but the placement of the external unit would mean it would not work as intended.

  • 2 months later...

Has anyone on here received their paperwork - ie Certificate of Installation and Handover pack from this company? I have chased up many times by phone and email and am still waiting since my installation in March 2022


I have been trying to contact them via the commissioners for Southwark council scheme Solar Energy Together. No progress so far.


Do not use this company.

Quite amazing that the offer from Green Energy Together was accepted by the council considering this looks to be the same people (David Elbourne) that were responsible for Solarplicity. They also had an astonishingly poor track record (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solarplicity).


In fact Ofgem took action against the company in 2019: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47329324 and they were in administration by the end of year (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/solarplicity-companies-information-for-customers).


Looking at the google reviews for Green Energy Together, this clearly isn't just Southwark. Nor does it look like Mr Elbourne has improved on his track record.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Very sad to see H&B on LL. Will still go to Health Matters! 
    • H&B Is coming to Lordship Lane  It will be next to the Large St Christophers in Lordship Lane Also just to confirm that Oliver Bonas is taking over the 2 white stuff shops (i spoke to the builders yesterday and they confirmed they are breaking through to combine all three shops)
    • So here we go again, but with a proposal for a bigger and longer event. This despite the massive failings (again) last year with serious & long lasting damage to our park throughout the summer, lack of effective waste management, widespread public nuisance by the attendees, and of course the noise. Every year GALA are set conditions for their event licence, every year they fail to meet them, then every year they are granted a licence again - depressing. First impressions from the site plan - the proposed footprint has increased dramatically, sprawling further down & across our park (image attached with 2024 footprint in orange & 2025 extension in red). There  will be a music stage within 50m of our front room. The entrance area will be on a sports pitch. The trackway for heavy plant access will be across two sports fields. The entrance / exit for heavy plant will be opposite a school. The road at that point is regularly gridlocked due to parked & waiting cars. Increased trackway = increased damage to grass. I'm sure there's plenty more that is unacceptable... It's clear that we all need to comment on this consultation, but it's not clear how to actually add comments / participate. The email & consultation document both direct you to the GALA page on the council website - www.southwark.gov.uk/Gala2025 - but this only has details of the GALA PR sessions, not the official consultation. I've raised this with the council, I'll post if I get a response. I've also raised the issue that the council's Outdoor Event Policy states that "Applications for major events must be submitted a minimum of nine months prior to the event start date.", which would have been August 29th 2024 for this application. This is apparently necessary to give sufficient time for things like consultations...
    • I'm sorry to see another chain opening up in the form of Holland and Barratt a couple of doors up from SMBS.  That will be another unfair pressure on SMBS .  I really hope people continue to support SMBS and its relative shop The Cheese Block under huge pressure with the arrival of Mons and Bora.  These are two of the oldest surviving (30 years plus?) green grocers, deli and unusual ingredient food shops in Lordship Lane and made it an interesting high street long before the chains and  newbies moved in.  I would think Healthmatters is none too happy either 😕 Support your local independent store or Lordship Lane will get really dull 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...