Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think it's a very great British pastime to celebrate your class and background. I don't think this particular class calculator is especially accurate, and people will often naturally feel differently to the result they get from said test. I grew up in a very working class household, outside toilet, family of 4/5 crammed into small damp ridden Victorian property in Peckham. Culturally I feel more aligned to old working class London than this affluent middle class culture which has sprung up around here. But financially, I might no longer fit into that group any longer. It's all very confusing.


Louisa.

please don't tell me i'm the only precariat on this forum. agree with *bob* though, the test is heavily skewed in favour of home owners and the wealthy. i re-did the test and pretended i was a home owner but marked myself down on the other questions to give the impression i was a cultural and social yob, still came out as an 'elite' though. a load of tosh as my farm labourer mates would say.

numbers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agree with jah. Loada bollocks and bollocks to it

> all.

>

> Cringing when I see people post their category on

> Facebook. Only the British eh!


Xxxxx


Ah come on numbers, it's just a bit of fun.


Like what Family Guy character you come out of a quiz as (Damn. I wasn't Brian :)). )

No Ethnicity dimension

No sexuality dumension

No regional dimension

Some groups look like what marketers call 'Lifestage' not class


Rubbish sociology and Heat type analysis from the BBC including a 5 minute session on the news last night.


Nice use of licence payers to dumb down and keep us chattering away about an irrelevance*



*none of this has anything to do with me being Established Middleclass

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No Ethnicity dimension

> No sexuality dumension

> No regional dimension

> Some groups look like what marketers call

> 'Lifestage' not class

>


And no Education dimension? (I only took the short test... was the long one different on this?)


Also, it doesn't attempt to assess you in relation to your family's background, ie how you were raised. So, I can easily see how there are plenty of newly in debt, non-property-owning, postgraduate and postdoctoral workers who will probably fall into the Emergent Service Workers Class.


In reality, these people probably come mainly from middle class backgrounds, and could by the level of their education be expected eventually to attain a middle class standard by this test.


Agree, some of these 'classes' are life stages with no clear sociological value. They don't set the individual in context. However, this would give the perception that people can move fluently up the class scale (something the government often seems keen to emphasize), when in fact if examined in context they're not really moving at all.

Chillaxed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, used that phrase without thinking about it.

>

>

> It's a general instruction issued by football

> managers to focus on the long ball.



...and there was I thinking it meant 'up to your bollocks in'. Tee Hee.

It doesn't explore history, because it's irrelevant.


It explores capacity, aspiration and intent.


You are simply who you are. The only interesting question is what decisions you will make.


Louisa and El Pibe doctoring the results to present the personality they would be if they weren't who they are is largely neither here nor there.


Their decisions will be made broadly according to self interest. That self interest may be enlightened or myopic. Research doesn't care.


As individuals you are completely unpredictable, as data points you become completely predictable.


If 70% of you are into homeopathy, it doesn't matter whether you as an individual are, I simply get a 7/10 hit rate for my mental twit juice.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > No Ethnicity dimension

> > No sexuality dumension

> > No regional dimension

>

> because none of them have anything to do with

> class maybe.


Or maybe because these things are as irrelevant as the rest of of the dimensions on the test.

No, class itself may be relevant to many things.


However, it may be that this particular Class Calculator is measuring dimensions which are irrelevant to many of the individuals it attempts to measure, unless you're purely interested in distilling a complex social phenomenon like "class" into a numerical indicator.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...