Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have a 4 year old and 18 month old sharing a room. They're keen to continue, though we do have a spare room too. I've always thought I'd put them in bunks eventually, and am wondering if it's too soon to start thinking about it as number 2 gets closer to 2. I'm pretty confident 4 year old would be fine on top (would get the lowest ones I could find). I suppose I'm less sure about whether the younger one might try and climb up, in which case this could just be a crazy hare-brained plan (admittedly I'm trying to save space). I'm sure number 2 will be into a proper bed far sooner than his brother for various reasons, and we def don't have room for 2 single beds, though as I say I could move one of them into the spare room. Anyway - I won't do anything rash but interested to know people's views/experiences with bunks?

We have just (2 days ago) put our two year old son and four year old daughter into bunk beds for similar reasons to you - though we do have a spare room, it's nice to keep that for the grandparent's visits and I actually really like that they share a room - they seem to enjoy it too. Anyway, 4 year old is on the top bunk - we got Ikea ones as they were nice, but fairly cheap and most importantly I didn't think the top bunk was too high for my daughter. Interestingly the instructions do say the top bunk is for 6 years plus but my daughter gets up and down the ladder very easily! There are also quite high wooden bars along the side of the top bunk so there is no way she could fall out. Anyway, she absolutely loves it on the top bunk so no problems with her.


The two year old has been a bit more tricky - only done 2 nights so far - first night was fine, didn't try to get out or wake up at all in the night but last night he got up 4 or 5 times just as I'd put them to bed. I suppose it's to be expected as he's always been in a cot and probably can't believe his luck that he can get out of his bed himself! Have to say that last night the sight of him appearing at the bottom of the stairs (in his sleeping bag having sat on his bum all the way down) did make me laugh though I've a feeling that I'll tire of it pretty soon if he carries on. On the plus side he's slept through the last two nights and we were going through a period of him waking up so I'm hoping he likes his bed so much it might also help this problem.. that might be wishful thinking but I'm hoping he feels less "trapped" and therefore won't wake up screaming to "get out!"... who knows but I'm keeping my fingers crossed...


One thing to look out for when buying the bed is to check whether the bottom bed has any kind of bar/ wooden bit round the side to stop the younger one falling out. Have to say that I didn't really think of this and it was only once we assmebled it that we thought this could be a problem as he could easily roll out having been used to just rolling up to the cot bars. We have wedged a soft chair next to the end he sleeps at as a temporary measure but I know other people who have bought bars that you can attach... I'm sure there must be bunks out there that have some kind of build in side like the top one does...

My two (nearly 5 and 6) are desperate for bunks, they share a room and each have a single bed at the moment. I'm reluctant as have friends whose daughter broke her arm when she was 6. My worry is that the kids get up in the night for the toilet, and no matter how competent at climbing in the day I'm not sure how they'd go in that woozy half asleep state.
We had them too, middle son who was around 3 fell out after sneaking up the top, luckily nothing broken! But then decided to seperate them as it was just too tempting for the younger one to climb up the ladder. I will be putting my youngest into a toddler bed in a couple of weeks from a cot, which I know he will love (the freedom!) but at least I haven't got the worry of him falling far, as if we still had the bunk beds he would be up the ladder like a rocket!
We had bunk beds for our two boys from age 6 & 2 as the little one needed to move out of his cot but the room was too small for 2 beds so there wasn't much choice - in the beginning I had to keep an eye that he didn't climb up but after a while he lost interest in the top bunk and we made his lower one cosy with bedside light, toys etc. they are now 9 and nearly 5 and still in bunks and will be for a while as they need to share a room! We have the metal white ikea ones, cheap but look great.

My toddler has been climbing up the ladder since she was 16months old. I remove it during the day but when she wakes up in the morning she is straight up there. Even removing it during the day means that she climbs up the end of it and jumps up and down up there. It's really quite scary.


Also when friends come over we end up with about 5 kids playing around up there (regardless of how many times I ask them to get down).


I think bunkbeds are fine when kids are over 5 (6 is the official age). I was told by the man in the store that most injuries occur whilst kids are playing, rather than them falling out.

My boys were at this age when they get they bunk bed.I get the short/small version. Probably they will outgrown out of it in the next few years but for now I am happ with my choice. It takes less space,seems cozy and not vey high(just over 5 ft).No accidents so far...
My 4 year old has been in the top bunk since just before his birthday. He's fine up and down the ladder in the night, and tends to shout out for me when he needs to get up, rather than getting up alone, anyway. His sister (2) will be joining him on the bottom bunk soon. She can climb up to the top already, but I'm not sure that she'd wake up in the night to do it...
sadly neither of mine are the types not to try and muck about on them. I guess I was trying to convince self would be ok. Like you Emma, we like to use the spare room for grandparents (my mum lives in Scotland so comes for week-long stays when she visits). Though I guess we could just move them in with each other on the occasions we do have guests. They do like sharing though! Realise it's quite a luxury to have the choice.
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...