Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If anyone wants to comment on on the new planning proposal for the Barry Parade Development you can via the link below. The ref is 22/AP/0539


It's marginally different to the proposal which is currently with the Secretary of State in appeal [Ref 18/AP/2238] after being rejected by the council, so if you commented on this previous version your comments won't be taken into account on the new one.


Comments need to be made by 21 April.


https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/simpleSearchResults.do?action=firstPage

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/307129-barry-parade-development/
Share on other sites

Go onto the Southwark planning portal and search for Barry parade, it will be the first one to pop up


Interesting issue is that they are proposing a loading bay for two retail units along the parking bays where the bus stop is on Barry Road.


Quote

DELIVERY AND SERVICING

4.5.1 As part of the previous application (18-AP-2238), it was agreed with LBS to amend the kerbside arrangements on Barry Road, by converting the existing parking bay north of the bus border into a loading bay. The suggested restrictions for this loading bay were ?Loading Only 7am to 10am, Max Stay 40 minutes, no return within two hours?.


4.5.2 The amendments also required the existing double yellow lines ?no waiting at any time? restrictions at the southern kerb of the Barry Road / Peckham Rye to be extended 4.5m to the southwest to prevent multiple vehicles using the loading bay, which would subsequently improve access for buses trying to turn into Barry Road.


4.5.3 For completeness, a copy of the on-street arrangement previously agreed with LBS is provided at Appendix D.


4.5.4 It is proposed to retain the agreed servicing arrangement for the proposed development. The agreed servicing strategy involved the use of the amended loading bay on Barry Road, which is suitably located in order to minimise transfer distances to the entry points to the ground floor commercial units.


4.5.5 Where required within the commercial units, roll cages and trolleys will be stored internally, with goods being delivered directly to the appropriate units - an approach which was acknowledged as being acceptable within paragraph 48 of the LBS officer?s report in response to the previous application.


4.5.6 In order to deliver this proposal, the Applicant would help fund a proportionate contribution towards an amendment to the Traffic Management Order which is anticipated to be incorporated within the Section 106 agreement.


Unquote


Now I'm not an expert but a bus at the stop and a lorry parked up outside the parade will create a hazard for cyclists and cars trying to get passed.


Not a practical or safe solution in my mind

The last planning application was turned down partly because 19 people objected. Currently there's only three comments on the latest application, all objecting.


I think there's less comments because there was a letter at the beginning of March saying that the previous planning application was with the Secretary of State for appeal and any comments made on this version would be taken into consideration with the appeal. The developer then put in a separate new application and a letter was sent to local residents mid March stating there was a planning application for Barry Parade. It looked like it was the same as the early March letter, although it wasn't.


Any comments on the new planning application need to be made by Thu 21 April.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, signs of sense and scrutiny of "leaders" not knowing the impact of what they have done, so much so that every citizen in the UK will suffer financially as a result of an incompetent, incoherent, unhinged Govt that's impact is effecting every citizen in the UK. Where things were being turned around by the last lot, this lot has already compromised all that work in its first 120 days in power. You may not like it but that's the truth.  We are never going to agree and actually Reeves, Rayner and Starmer need to go, like yesterday. 
    • Worse than gb news   Signs of unhinged minds 
    • This is why you are not the chancellor! Rachel Reeves won't be going anywhere until either she fixes things or Starmer needs someone to blame!
    • I fully agree. I hope you had some khinkali (Georgian dumplings), they're fantastic! They used to have only meat ones but now they also have mushroom ones and they're great. I always try to fit in a honey cake at dessert. Overall I appreciate that their food and menu seems to only improve with time.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...