Jump to content

The UK Government has made calorie labelling mandatory for all restaurants, pubs and cafes with 250


Recommended Posts

The UK Government has made calorie labelling mandatory for all restaurants, pubs and cafes with 250 or more employees from April 2022.


General rule so also applies to East Dulwich Cafes and Restaurants...


How many Cafes and Restaurants anywhere have 250 employees.. ?


DulwichFox

Is it the chain that has 250 employees or the local pub (are they franchises or directly managed or something else)


No way will they label beer - if anything I've noticed there are no price lists on the wall in lots of pubs - you just buy it and pay whatever the price is - so where will the calorie list go for my pint of Camden Hells.

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would be good if they had to show sugar

> content.



Plus carbohydrates, fat and salt as they are all important when looking at food.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> quite a lot on the Lane surely? Starting with

> EDT/Antic and including loads as you progress

> up/down - yer Franco

> Mancas/Meatliquors/Bishop(Greene King) etc


They are also taling about Cafes. How many Cafes are Chains... ??

I?m not convinced this will make a huge difference to obesity on its own, but a) it?s a step in the right direction, and b) more information is never a bad thing where this is concerned.


If it alerts people to the frankly staggering amount of calories that it?s easy to consume without releasing when purchasing meals out then I think it?s helpful. At least it?s an informed decision if you decide to get that burger or whatever. The rest is up to the individual.

Did anyone watch the Michael Mosley documentary on "who made Britain fat" ?


Whilst food labelling is a positive step, he pointed out that things like sports washing fast food and delivery services are still a problem that will accelerate the obesity crisis.

In response to JohnL:


"drinks containing more than 1.2% by volume of alcohol" are defined as "exempt foods" here.

I thought there was a legal requirement for a price list to be available in all public bars?


Generally, if there's a franchise agreement to provide food, and there's a common look and business model applied, it's the franchisor that'll be the qualifying business so far as employment numbers go. That would seem to go for the eating part of pubs too. Full definitive details at The Calorie Labelling (Out of Home Sector) (England) Regulations 2021.


I'm surprised they're not giving out free "adults need around 2000 kcal a day" badges for us all to wear.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No way will they label beer - if anything I've

> noticed there are no price lists on the wall in

> lots of pubs - you just buy it and pay whatever

> the price is - so where will the calorie list go

> for my pint of Camden Hells.


Tip for people trying to maintain a healthy diet : don't drink a lot of beer.


That's about all you need to know really.


(I am failing in this regard, personally)

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tip for people trying to maintain a healthy diet :

> don't drink a lot of beer.


La la la la lalalal :)


apparently its about 200 kcal per beer - proper low carb beer is in the process of being invented apparently

Price marking order for booze in pubs went a long time ago, I think under the Blair government, I assume as they were good mates with the alcohol industry and deregulated much. I voted for him BTW. Few pubs displayed prices and enforcement was low. Typical of Southwark eh? Concentrating on illegal sales of booze and fags, dodgy cosmetic products, dangerous electrical goods, knock off products etc.


The only price marking is now for filling stations to help shop around.

Champagne has relatively low calories compared to wine.


I think calories consumed is the wrong measure as it's not the right focus.


You can count your calories as much as you want but you also need to think about what you are actually eating and the impact on your body.


Sugar is a real problem. It has some many serious health risks (diabetes, weight, teeth etc), but is quite normalised. Look at the sugar content in the breakfast cereals you give your kids.


And as Spartacus says carbs, fat and salt are also things you should watch.

People eating too much (or drinking) and not moving enough is the problem. How to convince us to do less of the first and more of the second is hard so having a reminder via the calorie labelling method could at least light a spark. It?s not perfect but nothing is so I?m broadly for it.
I am against it. For those with eating disorders this information creates yet another barrier to overcoming anxiety around maintaining a healthy diet. Eating disorder charities believe that this action can increase fixations on restricting calories for anyone with anorexia or bulimia.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People eating too much (or drinking) and not

> moving enough is the problem. How to convince us

> to do less of the first and more of the second is

> hard so having a reminder via the calorie

> labelling method could at least light a spark.

> It?s not perfect but nothing is so I?m broadly for

> it.


I would recommend that viewing the Michael Mosley documentary on catch up will give you cause to think about the first part (eating less) and some interesting facts about exercise alone won't help.


If nothing more, it's a fascinating investigation

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone watch the Michael Mosley documentary on

> "who made Britain fat" ?

>

> Whilst food labelling is a positive step, he

> pointed out that things like sports washing fast

> food and delivery services are still a problem

> that will accelerate the obesity crisis.



Washing???!!!


I didn't see the documentary, but his books are very good

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sports washing is where they associate junk food

> with sports or sport activities to give the

> impression that it is somehow a healthy choice or

> can be a reward for healthy activity


Ah, OK!

  • 3 weeks later...

Whilst this is a divergence from tje topic of this thread, this article shows how food manufacturers sometimes try and wiggle out of legislation that's being introduced to curb obesity


BBC News - Kellogg's in court battle over new rules for high-sugar cereals

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61238630

If you?re happy to eat food made in factories you?re automatically dependent on the outcome of games these manufacturers play with legislation / licensing / whatever.

It?s processed food. That in itself should be the warning - it?s not real, it?s concocted food.

  • 3 weeks later...

This is a blow in the fight to cut obesity


BBC News - Junk food: Obesity strategy falling apart, Jamie Oliver says

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61449921


Whilst no one wants a nanny state, removing temptation is a key ingredient in fighting obesity.


I wonder if the government department sugared the deal with the food manufacturers ?

I think just having calorie content is misleading..

Fat, salt, and sugar content are also important to know.

Its healthier to eat a 750 calorie dish with low fat and sugar content than a 500 calorie one thats high in both.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...