Jump to content

Recommended Posts

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So did you go to Haberdashers' in the end

> cdonline? That was our first choice - our son was

> in the top band but we received a letter to say he

> was 84th on the waiting list. We decided not to

> bother appealing! They don't seem to give a hoot

> if your kid is bright, hard-working and motivated,

> he'd be much better off if he had a statement.

> Which seems a little unfair.



I did. I got in after the term had started, about six weeks.


Mum phoned or went to the school every day, got the headmaster from my primary school to do everything he could and just kept trying.

Wow. Was it worth it in the end? What was the school like? We lookeed at the figures - last year there were something like 120 appeals, of which two were successful. That swung it for us... plus the scholarship. The school he's going to is lovely, thank goodness.


Advice for Jimbo - move as near the school of your choice and check the oversubscription criteria asap...

My children are not even born, in fact I am not even pregnant, and you guys are giving me school anxiety. Did not think this was all so complicated (upper band? Statement? Harassing headteachers?) I am starting to agree with my hubby who wants to send our future brood to the French Lycee. The French administration seems like a piece of cake compared to what you are describing.

trinity Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My kids are at 2 different private schools in the

> immediate area and I have noticed that there are

> very few children with SE22 postcodes in their

> classes eg in my daughter's class of 24 children,

> only 2 live in SE22. The situation is similar in

> my son's school. In fact more children live in

> Wandsworth than se22.


You don't say what age they are. Anyway, yes at first it will be Balham-city, but each year that goes by, you'll find that more are local. With the selectivity of the schools, it is sensible to get those places secured then move locally.

I think even though many SE22 residents would be seen to have a decent income if you have more than one child, trying to find the extra for private education is really difficult. My daughter will transfer to secondary in two years from one of the really good local state primary schools and I find most parents are crossing their fingers and hoping that if enough kids who go to a good primary and have good parental support go to the local state secondary schools, then these schools will get better. Agree with the banding thing being frustrating too - when my son applied to Haberdashers many years ago it was suggested to me that he would be better off being at the bottom of the top band, or the top of the middle band. I didn't ask him to dumb down and we managed to find another school that we liked.
I think it's laughable that Haberdashers' calls itself an Academy (i.e. a comprehensive). A percentage of the kids are getting in on music scholarships (how fair is this to the disadvantaged?) and rather than serving the immediate community, kids from a wider area are allowed in by the complex oversubscription rules (presumably designed to limit the number of genuinely poor kids from the immediate area surrounding the school who might drag down the results). Those who know how to work the system are more likely to be middle-class, while the banding system discriminates against brighter, poorer kids. What an absolute mess.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's laughable that Haberdashers' calls

> itself an Academy (i.e. a comprehensive). A

> percentage of the kids are getting in on music

> scholarships (how fair is this to the

> disadvantaged?) and rather than serving the

> immediate community, kids from a wider area are

> allowed in by the complex oversubscription rules

> (presumably designed to limit the number of

> genuinely poor kids from the immediate area

> surrounding the school who might drag down the

> results). Those who know how to work the system

> are more likely to be middle-class, while the

> banding system discriminates against brighter,

> poorer kids. What an absolute mess.



There was a big hoo-ha about the status of the school around the time I left. The School was very keen to maintain its Six form, which was under threat by the ILEA.

I only know one family that send their children out of the area to be privately educated and that was to Newton Prep (in Vauxhall I think). I don't think that is the reason but I am happy for someone to prove me wrong.


At senior school I think that there is an influx of local children so perhaps the numbers of percentage of children from SE22 increases.


I think that SE22 doesn't (yet) have the wealth/age demographic that tends to private schooling. In addition I wonder whether the housing stock in SE22 will ever support that demographic eg more flats & smaller houses than SE21.

> In addition I wonder whether the housing stock in SE22 will ever support that demographic eg more flats & smaller houses than SE21.


If there is a property price crash for flats (conversions) it will be interesting to see whether smart developers do reverse conversions to family houses and make a neat profit in the process.

A survey I had sight of a couple of years ago showed that Alleyn's pupils came overwhelmingly from local postcodes (SE21, 22, 24, 5). SE22 was second only to SE21. Significant minorities came from Blackheath, Balham, Clapham, Battersea, Beckenham and Wandsworth.

I would be surprised if things have changed around that much in a couple of years.

Certainly, it seems likely that SE22 people would stick with their excellent primary schools till 11. Of the 125 places the school offers at 11, 40 will be filled by its Junior School pretty well automatically. So it is around 600 applicants going for the remaining 85 places. A number of those will be applying from private juniors and preps. Apparently, before their Junior School opened in 1992, 85% of Alleyns intake was from state primaries.

There are kids in this street that go to JAGS etc.and I've known other locals go to Dulwich College. Parents with secondary age kids will have paid relatively little for their home but it's still not easy finding the fees, which seem to have gone up very rapidly in recent years.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's laughable that Haberdashers' calls

> itself an Academy (i.e. a comprehensive). A

> percentage of the kids are getting in on music

> scholarships (how fair is this to the

> disadvantaged?) and rather than serving the

> immediate community, kids from a wider area are

> allowed in by the complex oversubscription rules

> (presumably designed to limit the number of

> genuinely poor kids from the immediate area

> surrounding the school who might drag down the

> results). Those who know how to work the system

> are more likely to be middle-class, while the

> banding system discriminates against brighter,

> poorer kids. What an absolute mess.


I'll say right from the start I don't have any children and so am probably massively under-qualified to comment on any of this but this comment strikes me as somewhat hypocritical. You said in another post that you had to resort to sending your own children to private school because the only other choice was a "sink school". I presume the use of the word "sink" suggests that they are performing poorly on league tables - the holy grail of parent choice.


Yet you decry Haberdashers because they dare try and attract those children who are already bright or musically gifted in order to improve their league table exam results. If they did as you suggest and allow in "poor" children from the local area despite being an excellent establishment they would, no doubt, achieve lower results. Ergo you would no longer want to send your children there. You cannot have it both ways.


I don't blame you for sending your kids to private school. It's your money. But don't chastise the system that you rely on to inform your choice. IMO league tables are themselves to blame. The lack of them in the past never seemed to hinder parent choice. We all knew good schools from bad. But at least then education could be for education's sake and not for climbing up one more notch on the dreaded league table.

Also to quote james...


James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's laughable that Haberdashers' calls

> itself an Academy (i.e. a comprehensive). A

> percentage of the kids are getting in on music

> scholarships (how fair is this to the

> disadvantaged?)


Is not offering scholarships to those musicially gifted who would not necessarilarly have the opportunity at other schools helping the "disadvantaged"?

My experience to date has only been with the prep age range and I have noticed a distinct lack of children from SE22 and particularly from the east side of Lordship Lane.


From comments so far on this thread it does seem as if there is an influx of local children at 11. This suggests that there is a confidence in the state primary schools which is does not exist for secondary schools.

My ex-wife insisted that our children were privately educated and paid for that privilege, she had had a similar background and went on to cambridge and in to medicine.

I did not know what a university was nor a private education.

Having seen what happens to the children through this system, I wondered if a more fruitful investment might be to put that education money into a property(?)

The children would have a place to live and a possibility to sub-let to ease any forthcoming financial burdens.

It is not meant to inflame anyone, it's just a thought.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...