Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Route 12 is now running every 12 minutes daily on Monday to Sunday with overnight buses continuing every 30 mins on Mon-Fri morning and every 20 mins every Sat-Sun.


This is a significant cut to the service which at one point operated every 3-4 mins and was cut last year to every 8 minutes.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/306292-bus-12-reduced-in-service/
Share on other sites

Thanks Bic


More info here : https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/buses/bus-changes


Guess that makes a mockery of local PTAL scores plus harder to convince people to use public transport over cars as the frequency of one of our local routes has been cut and connecting at Peckham Rye for trains will also be impacted.


Our local councillors and councillors to be should br all over this ?

It could be that because we can now use an infinite number of buses within 59 minutes of buying our first trip, the bosses thought people can hop on and off and make their way to wherever via two or more buses. Eg. get on at The Gardens and travel to Elephant and change to 453 to get to Oxford Circus. This is not good for those who want to go a shorter distance where there are no other options, though.
People with money will just use Uber and those without will have fewer choices...the decimation of bus services is bad for the environment and terrible for the least well off....I wish campaigns for active travel would spend a little more of their time campaigning for clean, cheap, reliable and accessible public transport for those less able to walk long distances or cycle, whether due to very young children, mobility and yes......choice. Only the relatively wealthy seem to be allowed to have choice in this world.

I'm all in favour of more public transport options, buses and trains; which are both being cut back right now.


It's hard though isn't it when less people are using these services than before, and the funding isn't there.


For anyone with a smartphone, there is a really good Bus Times app which can accurately (in my experience) tell you when the next bus is due. Not great in every situation, ie on connecting routes but hopefully helps reduce some of the time stood at bus stops for some people.


As I write, the next no 12 at my nearest stop is 16 minutes - that's far from ideal.

In defence of TfL and the timings, those amber-on-black signs sometimes change from an annoyingly long time to amazingly short in the blink of an eye, probably due to the driver coming on shift, etc. Buses started to get better when they stopped accepting cash so that boarding was quicker. Oyster and contactless and the apps and countdowns have made them even better, though the "new" design was hit and miss.
I sadly gave up on the 12 a long time ago. It takes me less time to cycle to my destination than it used to take me to walk to the bus stop and wait for the bus to arrive. This is not a pro cycling post. I firmly believe in public transport and cannot see how London can continue to operate the way things are going. Really feel for parents in particular who need to pick up and drop off.

Makes my blood boil


Mabaker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bus services in our part of London are inferior to

> other parts of London, which I've never

> understood. If anything, it should be better due

> to no tube service. Is it because the decision

> makers live north of the river?

I'm really enjoying hopping on and off buses. Great thing introduced by the Mayor. Just been on the P13 for the first time. It's a shame that there is so much negativity on this forum. Perhaps there is a more jolly Facebook site on local buses that I could join😊.


On the subject of the thread it is of course a shame that bus services are reduced - maybe a good reason such as declining demand resulting fro Covid or no doubt the state of TfL finances. But I see this as no reason to return to driving.


On negativity there is of course no way you can be upbeat on, say, Thames Water and their frequent leaks. But there is always a bigger picture of government policy, in particular particular the selling off of the energy, telecoms and other utilities. And on funding active and public transport gesture politics without the funding to deliver. Lounge territory. Have a good day.

Jenijenjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh Waseley, you haven't been paying attention.

> It's all the Labour Southwark Council's fault and

> the Labour London Mayor's fault, any other point

> of view has become heresy on the Forum.



Fabulous bit of gaslighting there jenijenjen, no one has blamed anyone but you may have noticed that I pointed out councillors and councillors to be should be all over this in terms of discussing with tfl about getting the frequency restored which will in turn support their active travel agenda.


Although as the Mayor says, "to the Mayor of London.and TfL every journey mayters" unless you can't get on because reduced frequency potentially means buses are more often full so passengers may be left at a stop.

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jenijenjen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Whoosh

>

>

> I assume that's the sound of a packed bus passing

> you at a stop 😉



Not possible because traffic has been so slowed down by the LTNs that it wouldn't be able to get up enough speed to make a whooshing sound.

The issue is that most ED bus routes go into central London and they were always down for being cut anyway with resources being put into improving outer London routes.


But there is a major issue of the Tory government drip feeding TfL money as punishment for Londoners voting for a Labour Mayor for a second term. If it wasn't for Covid, TfL would still be above water financially.


ED is unique I think in Inner London terms where it's pretty close to the centre, but has poor bus and rail transport links unless you live near to Forest Hill or Honor Oak Park stations.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Week 29 points...   Week 29 table...  
    • Cd collections wanted.. bigger the better Cash awaits dm me if you have something that may interest thanks Tim   
    • Hi everyone, we are trying to finslise our decision for enrolling our son for 3+ from September and currently considering Dulwich Prep or Herne Hill. We like both and appreciate there is no right or wrong answer but what we like about HH is great focus on early years and also being coed. However if we can avoid the 7+ stress then prefer to do that. Dulwich Prep is closer but the difference is not significant. we know children are very active and busy in DP and they have great facilities, but unlike HH, we don’t know much about their focus on personal development and emotional intelligence, etc! Also not sure about long-term impact of being in boys only school. Difficult decision for us and we appreciate feedback from parents if you can share please.    thank you
    • Yeah that was their old policy. Their new policy is to force you to have a water meter and if you refuse they put you on a punitively high tariff which effectively forces you to have one. I was doing well with my policy of polite resistance which was to say yes fine I'll have one fitted but then not actually book an appointment or cancel the appointments they made. But then I was persuaded that it would be much cheaper anyway. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...