Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Deptford got one of these first... http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-vZjevLZzt7E/T_ptFEfsuDI/AAAAAAAAEUk/bXpiR7eer1Q/s320/IMG_1429.JPG




Y'see, Waitrose see these and realise that people have correspondingly more cash for marinated elvers and such and so move in to the area... ergo you need to convince Poundland to move to the Lane first. Problem solved.

silverfox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fact is Waitrose would not have moved into

> Deptford unless the profile was right.

>

> what does that say about Ed?


ED has recently sent out a clear message that it is not open for business. Cant blame Waitrose and M&S for focussing their priorities elsewhere.

Haha my friend in Bellenden Road sent me a link to this thread (I am a former EDer and EDFrs, now New Cross). If it makes you feel any better, the Waitrose is not opening up in "Deptford as it currently exists", but in the gigantic riverside yuppie flat developments that are opening soon, and are essentially a westward extension of Greenwich.


But yeah guys, keep the faith!!!!

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "what does that say about Ed?"

>

> it says (for the umpteenth fliipin' time!) that ED

> has commercial property of a very small unit size



Maybe, but that hasn't stopped Tesco Metro and Sainbury's Local setting up in recent years.

The Evening Standard has basically PRETENDED that Deptford is getting a Waitrose (when in fact Greenwich is getting a Waitrose) in order to drum up interest in one of its major advertisers riverside developments, New Capital Quay. Hence why the article was followed by a full page advert flogging flats in New Capital Quay.


The new store is 100% west of Deptford Creek, the 'border' between Greenwich and Deptford and therefore 100% in SE10 (Greenwich) and not in SE8 (Deptford).


Waitrose themselves list it as being Greenwich, which it is - http://www.waitrose.com/content/waitrose/en/bf_home/bf.html


It is to be a large store I believe, over 30k sq ft, and opens at the end of July along with a heap of other shops, restaurants and cafes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...