-
-
Latest Discussions
-
It was a specific technical comment re the wording of the questionnaire and its likely effect on the results. It was of no concern to anybody else. I posted saying that I had PMed because people don't necessarily see that someone has sent a PM. I thought it was important to feed it back given that the questionnaire was part of someone's major project. But I'm not sure why you seem to have taken this so personally! It has absolutely nothing to do with you! -
Who owns/runs this place? They certainly seem to be holding some very strange events there. I thought it was still 1 April for a minute 😮
-
By first mate · Posted
Meantime, pushing this development through allows Cllr McAsh and the Council the opportunity to spin 'positive' numbers and data, to show they are meeting the council and Labour's new housing targets. -
I think that the value of one unit of social housing in a luxury block is so great that taking the money and building real social housing elsewhere with it, can be a preferable option.
-
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.