Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Maybe the mum in the article is looking for a career in the media as a commentator on parenting issues and whatnot - that would fit well around looking after kids. Has she been on Loose Women yet? If it's a publicity stunt, then it's worked pretty well!

Getting back on topic - the removal of child benefit, combined with this new tax credit for working mothers, leaves a number of stay at home mothers disadvantaged (ie they are getting less money from the state than before, and less than other parents on higher incomes are getting), as it has been implemented on an inequitable basis. Opposition is perfectly understandable and logical.


Should the state support families with children? Well it did until recently when it decided to introduce means testing for child benefits. I doubt any other political party would seriously consider removing child benefit altogether so lets assume that society agrees that having children should be supported by the state.


The current mix of child benefit and tax credits for childcare penalise single earner families relative to dual earners. I don't disagree that a childcare tax break should only be available for those who need childcare, but what about a transferrable married couples tax allowance?

I think support for families (whatever form it takes) should be means-tested. Household income would be a fairer test but would require the fundamentals of the UK tax system (i.e. the principal of individual only tax affairs) to be changed. Is that really worth doing for a inequity that in truth will only affect a small number of families on a relatively small benefit?


Personally, I think the upper income limit for this new child care voucher scheme is ridiculously high and should be lowered?and I say this as someone who under all circumstances won?t qualify for any of it. It?s a poor use of government funds in my view and disproportionately helps the well-off who would of course like it but certainly don?t need it. Childcare costs are never going to prevent someone earning 150k from returning to work so what?s the point of giving them vouchers?

I don't think it's helpful to bandy aroun terms like 'disadvantage' and 'penalize' in this debate - it destroys rational thought by deliberately inflaming base human emotions regarding 'loss'.


Twinset mum did the same thing in the telephone call by describing the system as an 'attack' on stay at home mothers.


As LM pointed out, the only sensible discussion lies in 'who is supported by tax payers and why'?


Since the advantages accrued by parents from their children vastly outweigh those derived by complete strangers, I see no logic in why complete strangers should pay for them to have kids (unless we're on a baby drive).


Conversely I think that complete strangers will benefit from thriving economies, and well adjusted and socialised kids, so I can form a perfectly reasonable case for supporting childcare and education fees.


I'm guessing there's a biological imperative from young parents that creates delusions about entitlements.

Haha, only because it broke the 'taboo' that elevates young parents into martyrdom. They're having kids for themselves, not for anybody else.


I think they should be approached like any other needy social zealots group - no special treatment should be accrued!

I'd imagine young parents are just looking for a bit of help, it sounds to me like it's the older ones with the sense of entitlement, at least the working from home barristers.


With no support network we have to pay 2k a month for childcare if we want to continue being productive, economically speaking, harldy a great incentive not to smoosh at home nursing a burgeoning sense of entitlement.


Still it was indeed our selfish desire to sow yet more unsupportable human filth on this disease wracked planet that got us here, so shouldn't complain I guess.

Admittedly I haven't read the whole thread, but surely through all of this, those "in need" are still getting the help from the state that they require. Stay at home parents with low or no income will be receiving various benefits, those in work will qualify for childcare allowance, those with an income below the threshold will still be receiving child benefit.


To me, this seems like an embarrassing case of middle class Mummies who stay at home wanting what their middle class Mummy mates get by going to work, and shouting to the media about it.


I haven't seen (for arguments sake) an interview with 17 year old stay at home unemployed parents Sheila and John moaning that they don't get the allowance.


I'm a stay at home Mum, I guess a "middle class" one, we don't qualify for any state help, and I wouldn't ever expect it.

It?s a tough one in regards to childcare as parents we need to spend more time with our children not just when they are toddlers, as work tends to consume so much of our time these days . There is a culture of kids where there is no parental guidance or the parent or parents are working thee jobs or they just don?t care where there children is. We just need a balance of family life and work life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, they are intelligent ❤️ Various methods of deterring the foxes (aka stopping them coming and crapping on your lawn) have been suggested in this thread. If you don't want to try them, and prefer to keep clearing up the crap and complaining about it, well that's YOUR choice 🙄
    • Weather going to be hot from today thru to weekend so I hope all dog owners walk their pooches early in the morning or in the cool of the evening. Woofers can survive the odd day without going for walkies in the heat or having to race around with their pack in the heat. Try brain games with them around the house - hid treats for them to find, given them a kong..  Mental stimulation is as good and beneficial as walkies and does tire them out.     And whilst on the subject of heat and dogs, do remember that leaving a couple of windows open while you run into a shop etc to get groceries etc …. Is not good enough / the inside of a car obviously gets very very hot… and one could be delayed in ship, thru no fault of your own - meanwhile, your woofer is suffering.  Common sense really and if you are a new owner, probably really never thought it through ie walking dogs in heat or leaving them in car in heat. The majority of people on this site are caring, supportive people only offering advice, expressing concern when they see stupidity.  
    • Weirdly (well, weird as it happened very shortly after I had posted that) I got a notice the other day (the first time in the near enough twenty years since I joined the forum) telling me I had reached my limit of "reactions". I posted a screenshot on here. However I did not actually seem be prevented  from  making any more!   What is your purpose in doing that? This is a useful, long running and well loved (by me, anyway) local forum. It provides information on matters of local interest, an opportunity to easily sell or give away  unwanted things and buy or be given things you want, information on upcoming local events and interest groups. It is also a well moderated place to discuss both local and wider issues. And it is used by a variety of different kinds of people, as would be expected - we all have different personalities, experiences and opinions, and that's part of what makes the forum such a great local asset. Since rescuing the forum when the previous admin left - it could have disappeared altogether - Joe has put and continues to put an enormous amount of work into setting it up on a different platform (?) , maintaining it, and keeping it a safe and pleasant place for everyone using it. I'm sure you and others will correct me if I'm wrong, but it feels to me that dissecting "posters and their patterns" in the way you describe - presumably then to post the results on here?  - is just going to sow seeds of discord which could stop some people posting altogether and generally change the whole nature of the forum. I think that would be very sad, and I hope that that isn't your intention? Are you going to include your own posts in this? You have joined the forum relatively recently, and seem to be self-described as a "Pain".
    • I’m beginning to think YOU are an AI agent at this point  would be less troubling than you actually believing all this stuff 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...