Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
I've always thought that objectively, in terms of a technically faithful reproduction, vinyl is far worse than CD. But as this guy says, some people like vinyl specifically because they are fond of the flaws. And that's fine, doesn't mean it's wrong. Kind of a similar argument with Steve Albini's fetish for analogue tape..

I'm pretty sure though that most champions of vinyl (at least that I know) don't claim it's a better sound, they just claim it feels better. It's warmer, fuzzier, somehow more natural *because* of it's imperfections, perfect reproduction often sounds sterile. Think studio versus live I guess.


Maybe its a generational thing, us older bods who grew up with vinyl are obviously harking back to bygone days and associations and we know it.


Yes early DAC was pretty terrible, but now I have a fairly budget one running off my PC and a nice set of headphones and the sound quality quite clearly blows my turntable out the water, but I still prefer sitting in the hifi room, the process of vinyl, the warmth of the sound.


Maybe (the potential straw man in his argument) some people claim it's objectively better quality, I don't know them personally, but they're probably the overzealous converts (hipsters?) who have 'discovered' vinyl.


I'm alos reminded of the idiots who swear by 'burn in' as if a DAC is going to preform better because it's had some current running through it for 300 hours. Obviously they're just getting used to a different sound and adjusting their brains to original expectations, but I blather...

Huh ? interesting


I always understood the ?vinyl feels better? argument from a subjective point, but for most of the time I always felt like I was being told, objectively, that vinyl was the best and that digital was bobbins


As I?ve recently moved (for the 12th time?) my crates of vinyl to a new address, I have come to accept I will never ever ever play any of them again ? time to ditch them I think

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As I?ve recently moved (for the 12th time?) my

> crates of vinyl to a new address, I have come to

> accept I will never ever ever play any of them again


That's strange... I'm in the exact opposite position. Only have a small amount of vinyl left (maybe 25 albums and 15 singles), but when I recently moved, I installed a nice sturdy shelf in the office specifically so I could set up the turntable once again. I think I've only used it twice since... but nevertheless it's pretty cool to hear the needle thud down onto the record, followed by the crackles and pops which give way to the opening bars of a classic album.

same here jeremy. When I went to my mum's to reclaim my old vinyl collection after too many years living in places that couldn't accomodate a turntable, leave alone records, I discovred she'd sold them all off to a local record store.

Plus all my dancve music that I lent my mate ended up in new zealand when he emigrated.


So only the small portion of 20 or so that was at my brothers survived. I don't even know how I'm going to find stuff in this corner of ireland.

Brilliant.


In fairness (really) cheap cables can murder a system, but you don't have to spend much.


When the sky engineer set up our system the other day he used a battered comes-with-your-telly HDMI and it was bascially snow and he looked aghast, so I quickly poassed him a normal one and the picture was suddenly clear. So it can't *all* be placebo effect.

To be honest anyone who is daft enough to spend hundreds of quid on a shelf or USB cables deserves to be parted from their cash.


Of course using really cheap/thin cables is a bad idea when you've spent a few hundred on a decent amp/speakers. Reasonable speaker stands are also important (nothing fancy, just something solid with the speakers sitting on spikes). But that's about it.


Digital cables should all behave identically, unless they're broken!


I'm sure *bob* could add something appropriately sarcasitc.

I was about to jokingly suggest going into business with audiophile SATA cables... you know, to improve the sonic qualities of the connection between the hard disk and the motherboard.


But of course, someone got there first:

http://www.hifidelit.com/products/ppa-red-sata-cable

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be honest anyone who is daft enough to spend

> hundreds of quid on a shelf or USB cables deserves

> to be parted from their cash.

>

> Of course using really cheap/thin cables is a bad

> idea when you've spent a few hundred on a decent

> amp/speakers. Reasonable speaker stands are also

> important (nothing fancy, just something solid

> with the speakers sitting on spikes). But that's

> about it.

>

> Digital cables should all behave identically,

> unless they're broken!

>

> I'm sure *bob* could add something appropriately

> sarcasitc.



Hundreds? You philistine Jeremy it's thousands you need to be spending


http://www.analogueseduction.net/audioquest-hdmi-cables/AQD12.html?gclid=CPaj1tDQ4r0CFbLMtAodW2kAeg

  • 4 weeks later...

Should I prepare myself to forgive bono?


I've ripped all my CDs and have snaffled up my wife's U2 along with it.


Having turned my back on everything that pompous arse touches since (the admittedly excellent) Achtung Baby, a process kicked off with the cringeworthy awfulness of Rattle & Hum, my mouse finger is occassionally teetering over their latest stuff.


So, should I or shouldn't I. Can I look past the man to the music, and would it be worth it at all?


I'm really only asking this because it's a slow lounge week, and bi-folding doors and bogey aren't cutting it for me....

It's a brave man who will admit to listening to Bono these days. I admire your pluck


However I once had a memorable afternoon in a Bristol boozer dancing around the pool table with some crusties and a load of cider listening to the Joshua Tree flat out.


I'll forgive U2 a lot for that alone

I still like plenty of Zooropa, and some of All That You Can't Leave Behind


POP is widely derided (not least by the band) but again, I can listen to plenty of it


And teh Passengers album is nicely out there


But before Achtung Baby, and after ATYCLB I can't listen to anything

I have thought about this with Coldplay, I basically dislike them and their music because I dislike Chris Martin. Which is silly and irrational, but you know, he annoys me.


But if I was from mars and knew nothing of this man and just heard the music would I find myself hating it? Probably not, even if it didn't exactly blow me away.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...