Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Something's wrong in the cosmos when the alpha papas of ED get all judgey mcjudgerson on the groovy young things of elsewhere. They're probably listening to Bowie while they're at it, with nary a hint of irony.


STEP AWAY FROM THE BOWIE. I REPEAT, STEP AWAY FROM THE BOWIE.


Here's some nice REO Speedwagon you might like.

http://img3.etsystatic.com/012/0/5358502/il_224xN.424911943_kc5m.jpg = http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsiEGMHVQ-dlhlI_9a0lgbyXN_6309sOh-pTCJTVpGeAlEqeqX


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQVqHV1TmG2_SKbRa-2Bht6LQjgHAVIgNBqRcYRVff2g35LTM7f = http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRsiEGMHVQ-dlhlI_9a0lgbyXN_6309sOh-pTCJTVpGeAlEqeqX


http://img3.etsystatic.com/012/0/5358502/il_224xN.424911943_kc5m.jpg + http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQVqHV1TmG2_SKbRa-2Bht6LQjgHAVIgNBqRcYRVff2g35LTM7f = http://theelephantgun.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/general-outrage1.jpg........... it's a matter of aesthetic balance.

I'm not disliking the whole beard/hipster thing in P-ham - mostly !


But there's ONE dude ( there has to be one )who I see that really friggin annoys me. No reason, I've never spoken to him, or anything else, but i've taken against him.


He's a tall dark haired, pony tailed, plaited beard-o who frequents the Rye Cafe. I've seen him with his child and with his partner too. His manner just urks me no end and I want to pull his plaited beard and cut it off with a giant pair of shears.


I'd quite like to pull his hair really hard too, the loud voiced creepy smug faced patronising cunt that he is.



If you fancy meeting up in the Cafe, we could gang up on him a bit.

  • 3 months later...

I thought a few of you might enjoy this

http://potlatch.typepad.com/weblog/2011/03/an-open-letter-to-the-hipsters.html


"If I were to tell you, my dear hipster, that you represent a post-liberal youth movement, you probably wouldn't have a clue what I meant. You have probably never met anyone who wasn't a liberal. You have scarcely heard of The Daily Mail, for which I envy you. Your idea of a conservative is someone who suggests you wear a bicycle helmet. Your boss doesn't even notice your tatoos, which must register as something of a shame. You are so liberal as to not even know it. So what is it you yearn for?



I suggest, it is the post-punk period of circa 1977-84, the years between The Sex Pistols ripping up the rule book, and The Smiths piecing it back together again. And let me go one further, with a proposition that might (or might not) offend some of you: what you yearn for is the fulfillment of the promises of Thatcherism. What frustrates you about Britain (and, for your American progenitors, New York and California) in the early 21st century is the gap between the rhetoric and the reality of economic freedom. You have been seeking to renew economic liberalism, just as baggy and rave renewed social liberalism."

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the few times I venture out into the land of

> late nights nowadays, the sad sight of many 50 and

> 40 somethings (mainly blokes) off their nuts on

> pills or coke takes me comfortably back to repeats

> of Morse and a bit of online poker on a Saturday

> night


Remember it's you who went to the wrong place - not them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The planters would be lovely if only the plants had been maintained once they had been planted. I think it would have been better not to have had them at all than to just leave them with plants in very poor condition. Were whoever installed them hoping that  residents in the relevant streets would look after them? 
    • I spoke at the council meeting last night to object. 400 people objected to the development. I, and I suspect everyone else, is not against development, BUT the size of this too BIG to accept. The council is held hostage by the developer who is promising 53 affordable homes. And in return they get to build 360 bedrooms for students. The original plan was all student accommodation. 8 stories is completely out of sync. It’s sets a precedent for future development. They have been taking to the council since 2022.  What did not help our cause whatsoever was Counsellors McAsh and Mwangangye speaking as ward counsellors at the meeting. As the Chair of the committee said, it’s not often ward counsellors attend such meetings. The counsellors will say they didn’t speak for or against the development. However, they did speak up for the benefits of the site bringing more affordable housing to the borough. They asked for a window to have frosted glass to protect privacy. They asked for residents to be consulted during the building phase. So let’s be really clear, they did not say anything about the “optimisation” of the site. They did not ask for the site to be scaled down. Now I know why James would not be drawn into discussing the development before now….   Make no mistake, this development is optimised for profit and the trade off is the developer profits at scale and the council have 53 affordable homes. The Southwark Plan says they should respect the character of East Dulwich. How can an 8 story building be ever respectful to the character of East Dulwich. It’s a hugely imposing building.  Unless we stand up together as a community, then we shall be stuck with it, although I suspect we won’t be stuck with our Labour counsellors for much longer… Feeling let down and disappointed this morning.   
    • Another glowing review for Niko the plumber. I found his details on the forum after we had a water leak. He was able to come round same day and fixed our problem. He was very reasonable and did a great job.    His number is 07818 607583.   Matt 
    • Putin's little helpers (like theTelegraph) TRUMPeting (sorry not sorry) the fact that UK only gets 10% tariff from uSA as a Brexit Dividend and validating Starmer's qauiescence  Which ignores so much The tariff was calculated on a childish  deficit/exports calculation and ignored any discussion 25% on cars remains in place for UK as well The difference between 10% UK vs 20% EU is a fraction of the cost of Brexit anyway (that cost was dismissed as "worth it" or hand waved away - whereas this relatively small "Win" is heralded as a major victory plus in any case even if UK was on 0%, teh global fallout from this will massively impact UK as a standalone country anyway   Of course not many countries escaped with 0% - oh but Russia did (although that is likely because they are already sanctioned)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...