Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KK - maybe not the most up to date version, I wouldn't dare look at the BNP site in the office to be honest.


But according to BBC news, the 2005 election manifesto includes "firm but voluntary incentives for immigrants and their descendants to return home". Controlling immigration is one thing, but to me, the above is incredibly offensive. And aren't most of us "descendants of immigrants" in one way or another?


By the way, I think the previous policy, prior to Nick Griffin, was forcible repatriation of non-whites. You can't tell me that the BNP members have all changed their views... they're just become more media savvy. Wake up KK, the BNP are a racist organisation.

I'm sorry, but any political party that has the following at the heart of their Mission Statement has to be seriously suspect:


"The British National Party exists to secure a future for the indigenous peoples of these islands in the North Atlantic which have been our homeland for millennia. We use the term indigenous to describe the people whose ancestors were the earliest settlers here after the last great Ice Age and which have been complemented by the historic migrations from mainland Europe. The migrations of the Celts, Anglo-Saxons, Danes, Norse and closely related kindred peoples have been, over the past few thousands years, instrumental in defining the character of our family of nations."


I'm all for free speech and I think people should read their manifesto and decide for themselves what to think. I'm sure that the vast majority of us will see them for what they really are. A dangerous bunch of rascist's that try to make themselves look respectable by distancing themselves from the NF, but who's true aim is white supremacy at any cost. Any attempt at serious economic/social/environmental policies in their manifesto is just a smokescreen.

Slavs = not included in the definition of Kindred peoples- see also :Hitler


The BNP would be lauaghable if they dodnt have so much support in run down white areas - go up to Barking/ Dagenham way - a mainstay of Blue Collar East London amd you can see how the descendents of the infamous Ench Powell supporting Dockers are getting behind the BNP


The area has a relatively high level of Balkans migrants and certain areas are de facto ethinic ghettos - both UK White & Migrant sections - its very tense and a shitty shitty rotten place to live

Where did I say they were or were not, as u say, "racist"?

I care not either way. I just don't see why, if we're all for freedom of speech, certain forumites on this thread have jumped on maximay just for expressing their own opinion even if you agree or not. Not very fair is it?

LizzygotDizzy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its people like you (closet racists) that keep the

> BNP in power - ))))at Max! and whoever else feels

> the same way as he does!

>

> Sickos!


Is this not a personal attack on someone? No? sorry my mistake *sighs*

By the same token KK, as someone from a mixed ethnic background and a shortfall of genes from the "indiginous peoples" pool I find the "Nothing wrong with the BNP" statement personally offensive.


However, I would at this point like to apologise for my ancestors invading Britain in AD 43.

Maximay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm...excuse me Ms Dizzy, but I think you need to

> get your facts right! Nothing wrong with the BNP


There is nothing wrong with voicing your own opinions as long as you are big enough and ugly enough to take whats thrown back at you when people take offense to what you are saying,


KK said "Where did I say they were or were not, as u say, "racist"? I care not either way". y'ok!


Am I not entitled to voice my own opinion then on the fact that I find ANYONE who supports the BNP to be misguided for want of a softer word in case sick offends anyone!

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Oh dear, some of my heritage is Norman - best

> get

> > me ticket.

>

> Normans were actually Ethnic Vikings, so dont

> worry about that


I have an Uncle Norman. Should I worry? I don?t think he is a BNP member or a Viking but he does have a moustache.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am delighted to hear the development was approved.  In my opinion, the UK is building far too little housing. And unless we build on green belts, the only solution is to increase the density of our cities, which is exactly what this scheme achieves.  Where I'm from (France), planning is generally looser and in my home city it's common to see single dwellings being razed to make way for a 5-6 story block of flats, even in city centres. Does it change the character of the local area? For sure! But I don't see another way to provide the supply to meet demand and provide ample supply of housing for a growing population. My personal experience is that in the UK, there is a lot more time spent on consultations, on achieving a perfect outcome for everyone. This results in generally better and more harmonious building than in France, but it makes things slower and more costly, with the need to coordinate many consultants.  It's interesting to compare France and the UK as they have similar populations and population growth, with an economy centred on a huge capital city. When you look at the number of houses/flats built in France and the UK over the past 10 years, the result is pretty striking. # France UK Difference 2023 298,100 150,370 -147,730 2022 392,100 182,070 -210,030 2021 410,000 177,160 -232,840 2020 368,800 129,440 -239,360 2019 387,700 153,000 -234,700 2018 401,200 168,610 -232,590 2017 434,700 164,110 -270,590 2016 370,000 155,150 -214,850 2015 341,000 148,150 -192,850 2014 336,900 140,760 -196,140 2013 357,900 124,790 -233,110 2012 382,300 101,020 -281,280 Total 4,480,700 1,794,630 -2,686,070 Average 373,392 149,553 -223,839 When HS1 was built, the French engineers (it was built with the French high-speed signalling) were surprised at how Brits wanted to "gold-plate" everything. The UK arguably has the best, most effective, more reliable, more well-equipped high-speed line in the world, but we've only got 68 miles of it and it cost 2.5 times what it cost the French to build a line extension at the same time.  In my view, there's no magic wand: just deciding who will be the losers. In France, people in established neighbourhoods my lose out as they see them change dramatically, while the new entrants benefit from a much higher supply of housing (and thus cheaper housing). In the UK, we give greater priority to preserving the lifestyle and amenity of the established dwellers over the new entrants who lose out as the supply is choked and prices are higher. A final point of comparison would be the price per square foot of property in Greater Paris is £467 while in Greater London it's £667 - 30% cheaper!
    • This web page lists some companies that recycle CDs https://www.reducereuserecycle.co.uk/where_can_I_recycle/cds_and_dvds.php  
    • I heard it as well, woke me up, very strange.  I don't care for myself but I do worry for people with children and animals, it is a nuisance and happens more and more nowadays.
    • Has that ever actually happened? The bags are quite bright, and don't blend in with the pavement, so are quite noticeable. But surely there can't be many  cases where someone has bothered to put the s**t in a bag,  but then just leaves the bag on the pavement?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...