Jump to content

Would you recommend filling the gaps in wooden floors?


on_the_hill

Recommended Posts

Hello, I'm after some advice if anyone has had any experience about this.


We're about to sand our floors, which have never been done and are tongue and grove. I've had mixed suggestions about whether to fill the gaps in between the boards. Some people reckon if you don't they become very dirty and difficult to clean, others have said it is all down to vacuuming periodically, plus there are some comments about how the house will be more difficult to heat as the heat won't rise to top floors as easily, but my thoughts are that they would also make the rooms keep the heat a bit better??


Any recommendations/experiences much appreciated.

Do you mind having gaps from an aesthetic view? Filling the gaps is not an exact science and everyone has an opinion on it. Personally I just live with them (non t&g flooring)


The two main reasons people fill them are for aesthetic reasons and to stop draughts. Better to lift the floor and suspend insulation underneath.


Floorboards move due to heat and humidity levels so the gap filling often cracks and falls out. I've yet to see it done perfectly (and would love to!). In fact that's why you have the gaps to begin with, to allow for movement, so the filling has to be flexible.


I've never heard the argument about the house being more difficult to heat, and the cost of filling the gaps would far, far outweigh any cost savings.

It depends why you are doing it and size of gaps. Our old house was done professionally and very well though if the boards flex a lot the filler comes out. New house has been neglected for years and getting th gaps clean virtually impossible. Also really cold in winter though my personal bug bear is the amount of toys that fall between them and are irretrievable...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • If you are in your eighties and you now live on your own in a £2m house that you bought for £63,000 in 1968 then of course you are entitled to live there as long as you can physically do so.  But I also like to think of a local dad I know, a teacher, who lives with his wife and kids in a modern two bed flat in SE22 that they part-own (thanks to a contribution from wife's parents).  The dad goes running in Dulwich Park every morning first thing, and told me wistfully how he sometimes looks out at all these huge unused gardens with rusting trampolines and empty bedrooms and wonders how the world came to this.
    • And when that couple in their late 70's and 50's and 80's pop their clogs, the government will be back for an IHT tax grab at 40% of the value. For anyone in their 30's and 40's I would seriously suggest emigrating to Australia or Canada where there's on IHT
    • London is changing to an older wealthier population, due to inflated property values pushing younger people out to other areas ( unless or until they inherit). It doesn’t mean that they are rich, you can be asset rich and cash poor.    It’s not the best way to increase taxes but it’s not really looking at being fair. 
    • "They can move" is basically gentrification in a sentence. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...