Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dad was always too obvious - altho' where was he between 1 and 3am? I wondered about mum because of the dream she had right at the beginning - or was that just a mother's sense? But maybe she and daniel shared a sleepwalking gene... Then there's bloke from "two pints..." - weird but not much of a suspect since I keep expecting him to say something ridiculously inane and funny. Or Chloe's boyf? Or Birds of a Feather lady, she has the skateboard after all...


Anyway, it's brilliant, isn't it?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/30287-broadchurch-whodunnit/
Share on other sites

Reggie, you have a point, tonight's episode certainly puts him squarely in the frame. As it does with Birds of a Feather lady, vicar, and, most pointedly, the man from the newsagents (where do we know him from?)


Then there's Mark's plumber mate who was clearly keen to frame Mr Newsagent, and of course there's Tom still to consider - so basically, EDF, I think we're saying we don't know?


At least ITV have finally turned something out that's worth watching.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What about the vicar - never trust a religious

> nutter.


Especially when he's a Time Traveller (Rory) in disguise.


Also David Bradley (the newspaper man with a past) was the caretaker in the Harry Potter films.

Pauline Q of high tar fag fame; Mark's side kick, definitely something to hide; Ellie's husband for all the reasons Reggie already gave - I'm still undecided but reckon these are top 3 suspects. Oh, and the vicar, so that's top 4, in no particular order. Which means, still have no idea!


What about Becca Fisher, if there's a 2 hr gap in Mark's alibi then is the same true for her? What's the point of her if she's not a suspect?

I'd have thought any snarling villain is too obvious so no to pauline 'come walk my dog and leave your skateboard as a glimpse of subsequent plot deviec' quirk and mark's 'get orrrrf moi laaand, yier dead meat moi luvver' sidekick.


I thought the vicar was too obvious but they've been giving us a dose of all round community good guy so he's shot to number two in my list.

I'd say Ellie's husband as only real all out good guy so far, even get's on with grumpy rozza, has to be top of the list.

I reckon plumber chappie was shooting albatross from boat accompanied by two lads. He then turns to showing off his William Tell qualities, balancing a mobile phone on their heads and rocking motion means he accidentally kills boy one and mobile is lost. He frightens boy two into silence.


Whole thing witnessed by Pauline while out walking dog on cliffs. She is now blackmailing plumber. Boat set on fire to hide evidence.


Vicar will catch a large fish which has swallowed said phone - photos on phone will incriminate plumber in albatross-shooting incident which is probably illegal and he will crack under questioning and confess to manslaughter. [Can't have too many miracles where large fish are concerned]


Blood in beach hut actually from earlier boyish blood brothers scene as a result of watching too many westerns. The pain caused by this made boy one run away leaving his skateboard behind which Pauline, after a bout of energetic dusting, rides home to the caravan which is downhill. She is too embarrassed to confess.


Can't work the postman into this scenario so will have to have a rethink.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Leave it white then new people can paint to their taste - that is why in show properties, they are white throughout or neutral. Def no feature wall. Might consider a lump sum for flooring as opposed to going grey. Ideally no curtains at all but if you wish then maybe blinds in lounge and bedroom.
    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...