Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast majority of residents? but the vast majority of respondents. Two very different things, yet some struggle to tell the difference.


Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other Labour

> Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by the

> vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk since

> the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> politicians response when they're in power.

Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where no matter what a councillor says some will twist it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda. Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid driving. That?s true of most travel in London.



jazzer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather than

> go of at various unconnected tangent's.

>

> If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> starting a separate thread.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> respondents. Two very different things, yet some

> struggle to tell the difference.

>

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> Labour

> > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported pushing

> > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> the

> > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude of

> > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> since

> > the start and now to pass the buck is a typical

> > politicians response when they're in power.


It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

march46 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good idea - unfortunately it?s got the stage where

> no matter what a councillor says some will twist

> it and interpret it in a way to suit their agenda.

> Cllr Leeming was helpfully informing people of the

> Thames Water works, he?s right it probably will be

> quicker to walk or cycle if you can possibly avoid

> driving. That?s true of most travel in London.

>

>

> jazzer Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Perhaps bring this back to the topic, rather

> than

> > go of at various unconnected tangent's.

> >

> > If you want to talk about cllrs/MP, how about

> > starting a separate thread.



To be fair I think a lot of people take offence to his tone and his, sometimes, pointed and demeaning tweets.


I am not sure what value adding the comment below brings to his thread, other than trying to have a dig:


Remember, this is the responsibility of Thames Water not the council


Either that or he is really worried about losing his seat and feels the need to spell it out to people! Pretty sure most people realize the water main has nothing to do with the council!

These threads can get abit personal at times??

Every now & again I take a peak but can?t be asked comment 🤨


London is a city for gods sake??. You will never get country roads/lanes down here!

All these LTN?s are helping nobody other than the councils/government fill their pockets!

If you mistakenly think for a second the government care about you, then I suggest you think again!


LTN supporters can support them all day long, all these past, present & future charges they are talking about are affecting the consumer?? the bottom line is everything is about clawing money from us for whatever they wish to use it for, we will always be worse off no matter how climate friendly you are!


Yes I know my post isn?t about the south circular, I?m sorry, but I just wanted to say something

Btw, I?m a driver & drive for a living but do not own a car simply because I don?t need one.

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> march46 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the vast

> > majority of residents? but the vast majority of

> > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> some

> > struggle to tell the difference.

> >

> > Bic Basher Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > Labour

> > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> pushing

> > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported by

> > the

> > > vast majority of residents, yet the attitude

> of

> > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > since

> > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> typical

> > > politicians response when they're in power.

>

> It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.


Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN because they had their facts straight. 🤔

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > march46 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Your regular reminder that it wasn?t ?the

> vast

> > > majority of residents? but the vast majority

> of

> > > respondents. Two very different things, yet

> > some

> > > struggle to tell the difference.

> > >

> > > Bic Basher Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Two Dulwich Village Cllrs along with other

> > > Labour

> > > > Cllrs in other Dulwich wards supported

> > pushing

> > > > through a LTN scheme that wasn't supported

> by

> > > the

> > > > vast majority of residents, yet the

> attitude

> > of

> > > > one particular Village Ward Cllr has stunk

> > > since

> > > > the start and now to pass the buck is a

> > typical

> > > > politicians response when they're in power.

> >

> > It's easy to spot a pro LTN person on EDF.

>

> Interesting that you identified someone as pro-LDN

> because they had their facts straight. 🤔



Another LTN troll.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, signs of sense and scrutiny of "leaders" not knowing the impact of what they have done, so much so that every citizen in the UK will suffer financially as a result of an incompetent, incoherent, unhinged Govt that's impact is effecting every citizen in the UK. Where things were being turned around by the last lot, this lot has already compromised all that work in its first 120 days in power. You may not like it but that's the truth.  We are never going to agree and actually Reeves, Rayner and Starmer need to go, like yesterday. 
    • Worse than gb news   Signs of unhinged minds 
    • This is why you are not the chancellor! Rachel Reeves won't be going anywhere until either she fixes things or Starmer needs someone to blame!
    • I fully agree. I hope you had some khinkali (Georgian dumplings), they're fantastic! They used to have only meat ones but now they also have mushroom ones and they're great. I always try to fit in a honey cake at dessert. Overall I appreciate that their food and menu seems to only improve with time.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...