Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I love the Hillcourtcouple. Its about time we got some proper rural values into the ED. I grew up in the rural Midlands (it exists). I shot and ferreted. Foxes and rabbits were my meat and drink, sometimes still twitching - but hey.


Nature is red in tooth and claw. Mr Fox will happily take your pet rabbit, white fluffy cat and gerbil. Make no mistake they will have your cuddly pets for supper with no qualms.


Get a grip ubanites, rural life has come to town and rural solutions are required.

ooo..i don't know mikewbate...i don't like the idea of foxes and their cubs being killed in this way. what if the trap doesn't kill them outright and they're trapped half dying in agony. also - what about the cats! these are people's pets. my neighbours would trap the trapmakers if their cat was killed like this. find it a bit freaky that people can rustle up such devices in their backyards, trap an array of animals then dig a pit and bury them - it's gruesome.

I believe foxes shouldn't be encouraged to stay in cities, the only reason they are here is because people feed them scraps and they eat the waste and rubbish we throw out. Here's a typical mangy city fox compared to a healthy country fox:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/FoxInHighPark.JPG/180px-FoxInHighPark.JPGhttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ee/Vulpes_vulpes.jpg/200px-Vulpes_vulpes.jpg


The ones I see in London are like the one on the left and I think it's more humane to get them back to the countryside.

True Mark - but foxes are territorial - hence the pungent wee for boundary marking.


The coutryside is already fully populated by foxes - so they are pushing into the cities via railway lines - they trot long them rather than buy a ticket.


Dump an urban fox into the countryside and they will probably perish because they dont have a territory and will get beaten up by the sitting tennants and because they are pretty clueless when it comes to hunting - rural wildlife is wilier than fat urban rats, mice, pets and wheelie bins. Cubs are taught to hunt by their parents in the context of their territories - the urge to hunt is genetic, the ability is not.


The rural human population would also not take kindly to dumping yet more carnivores in their back yard and urban foxes being used to close human contact would be drawn to human habitation by hunger and so quickly get shot.

If we were all more careful with our rubbish and didn't leave things for the foxes to scavenge, maybe they'd go away.


Mikewbate is right - foxes would not hesitate in killing another animal for its supper. But that's their instinct, not a considered decision by mr fox! I don't think it's instinctive for humans to trap/kill animals. You can't really compare the behaviour of foxes and humans.

I am not overly sentimental about foxes (having been brought up in semi rural Midlands) and agree that we all have a part to play in ensuring that there is nothing for them to scavenge. When I first read Hillcourtcouple's thread I thought the foxes went to the pit alive...! Reading the subsequent threads I hope that I was wrong about that. I agree something should be done - on page 23 of the attached document the question of what Southwark Council might do about foxes was raised. It also talks about the use of traps.


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/Uploads/FILE_7084.pdf

Fox behaviour is instinctive and so they kill and cause mess. The human reaction is indeed not instinctive, but it is a reaction to fox behaviour. People have to decide what they concider to be acceptable.


Personally I have no problem with urban foxes. When I lived in the countryside I did have a problem with rural foxes because they killed livestock.

Mikewbate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The human reaction is indeed not

> instinctive, but it is a reaction to fox

> behaviour. People have to decide what they

> concider to be acceptable.

>


Why should we have the right to decide what is acceptable for a fox to do, and to kill said fox if it breaks our rules (rules that the fox isn't aware of?


It's a strange world, foxes get killed for eating livestock, simply because we're annoyed as we had intended to eat that livestock.... I'm not a vegetarian (much to the disgust of my better half), but I don't like human feeling of superiority over everything else on this planet... One could argue that that's how we've buggered the place up so much, through our own arrogance!


Ahem, sorry... *climbs down from high horse*

Keef that view holds only if you see mankind as being outside of nature. Which we are not. We are an organism that acts to procreate our species at the expense of others - much as other do, its the selfish gene. We are more successfull and so that is threatening our own future and the futures of other species. Our rape of the planet is as natural as the exploitation of a host animal by parasite. The death of the host brings the death of the parasite.


Farmers protect their livelihood from foxes. If somebody or something started taking your property from you, you would act to stop it. The fact that this results in the death of a fox is somewhat irrelevant in the context of those of us who are carnivores (me included) and are therefore complicit in the slaughter of many thousands of creatures in our lifetimes.


The main issue is that many people are dislocated by the death and destruction that facilitates our comfortable life style. We either start living more challenging life-styles or we accept the destruction.

But if the selfish gene leads the way, surely we should all just be running on instict, much as the fox does in killing it's prey.


If we have the capacity to realise that our actions are destroying our planet, surely our instinct for survival should lead us to then try to save the planet... No?

Unfortunately it is not a collective instinct - it is an individual or tibal instinct. So our individual or tribal instinct to survive and thrive means that we compete for resources at the expense of other individuals and tribes even if this will lead to the destruction of the collective whole. For instance if we had a collective instinct for survival the international control of CO2 emissions would be easy; the more tribal survival instinct means that India, China and the US in particular are unwilling to give ground.


Thus we are all stuffed.

Have any of you been watching Adam Curtis' documentary about freedom all gone wrong.

Boiled down to it's bare minimum it says that much of our post war social topography (particularly post 70s) has been driven by theories from mathematicians who modelled us all as being inherently selfish creatures wh oare always trying to get one over everybody else to maximise our own chances of survival/income/comfort/breeding lines.

The problem being that this basis for the model of a market led society was ultimately bollocks, and we do have things like social bonds and altruism.


Interesting stuff, though he does push it on ocassion (Yes Minister as thatcherite propaganda anyone?!?!)


Oh yeah, foxes. pigeons are nice in Letchworth and manky in london. Same goes for foxes, it's not the noisy sex that annoys me, no worse than drunken students heading back to halls on denmark hill, it's the nasty mangyness. Pest like any other i say.


To paraphrase, a pigeon is a rat with wings, a fox is a big rat with good PR.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There are two causes for this problem   The first is that modern safety requirements for cars (to protect pedestrians and cyclists in collisions) mean huge amounts of excess spacing in crumple zones to provide a cushion on impact. For example, in the past a lot of pedestrians suffered catastrophic head injuries when they ran in front of a car, because the bonnet was close to the engine block, so their heads bent the bonnet into the solid immovable engine and their heads cam off worse. To mitigate that there is now a huge amount of flex and space so that the head is cushioned from the engine. Naturally, the rest of the body work and car frame has had to increase to accommodate this safety measure.   The second issue is electrification.   Electric cars are massive because they have to carry huge batteries around to make them work. Massive amounts of space and height is given over to batteries in electric cars. The new electric Renault 5 (described as a "compact" hatch back) is nearly 4 metres long 2 metres wide.    That makes it longer and wider than the original Range Rover. 
    • Pretentious status vehicles.  Last year I was trying to drive down my own street but, being in a little, inferior car, was expected to make way for a stream of SUVs / Chelsea tractors as they barged along beside me. After what felt like an age, I saw a window of opportunity, but was beaten to it by yet another tank. By this stage I was irate (I hate the things) and having a full on shouting match with myself behind the wheel.  A Tesla in the oncoming queue pulled in, flashed and courteously allowed me to take my moment. The Tesla's windows were tinted, but not so much that I wasn't able to make out the driver, as I passed him. I'd recognise that mega-watt smile anywhere. It was Peter Crouch, laughing and giving me the thumbs up, clearly entertained by my tantrum. 
    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...