Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My adult daughter was witness this afternoon to a car driver intentionally running into a cyclist (who had overtaken him in a queue of traffic at the lights) hitting him against a parked car several times and running over and destroying his bike. He then drove off. There were many witnesses, a number, including my daughter, photographed the event and his reg. number. My daughter phoned the police, but on learning that the cyclist wasn't severely injured (bruised and shaken I'm guessing, as it was all at low speed) they said this wasn't the sort of incident they would come out to - despite the fact that the cyclist had been assaulted by a man in a car, who had gone on to intentionally total his bike - which makes that assault leading to actual bodily harm and criminal damage in my book.


Obviously terrible for the poor cyclist (but a lot of people gave support and e.g. shared their photographs and evidence of the event) - but what sort of service is the Met giving us?


Too busy chasing up year-old office parties to bother with trivia like this no doubt (and yes, I know those are different branches of the Met, but really!).

Whilst I agree that the motorist should be made to pay for the damage to the bike (by the way, I'm not sure insurance will necessarily pay out for damage caused by the criminal intent of the insured) I believe that he should not be licensed to drive, if he cannot contain his rage for a 'slight' by another road user (as described to me by my daughter, I was not myself a witness). He is a danger on the road and shouldn't be allowed to drive.

Could you give a description of the driver and car and, if possible, registration number? This individual is clearly a danger to other road users and deserves to be named and shamed.

NB: From next month the Highway Code is being updated to include a 'hierarchy of road users' - let's hope the Met are up to speed with the changes...

https://www.theorytestpro.co.uk/posts/explained-the-highway-code-s-new-road-user-hierarchy/

Hi Penguin,


This is horrendous and is an an assault with a dangerous weapon.


It has also been recorded by witnesses.


The police said they weren?t going to *attend* but do we know if they are going to investigate? They may well have ample evidence. It might be worth finding out, and I?m happy to help.


The police need a massive and repeated kick up the arse and I wouldn?t be at all surprised if they are institutionally anti-cyclist as well as being institutionally racist, sexist and homophobic.

Hang on... the police said they weren't going to come out to the site of the incident. I can't see anywhere here where they said they wouldn't investigate.

Don't be so quick to criticise/judge without knowing all the facts.

Just to clarify, my daughter reported this incident to the police, who, as soon as they ascertained that the victim was not seriously injured advised that he could report the attack using an on-line form. As the victim was a stranger to my daughter, who knew neither his name, address or telephone number (and therefore did not give these to the police) I would be interested to know how they might have proactively pursued (or investigated) this.


The scene of crime (and it was a crime) at the time had bicycle parts strewn over the road. Now dispersed and not available for evidence. And the people who viewed the crime (and might have stayed around to give evidence had the police deigned to turn up) are also dispersed.


I don't know all the facts, of course, but as my daughter was the contact who called the police, as she was a witness (a rather shocked witness) to the whole attack I believe I am quite close to 'the facts' - close enough anyway to have drawn a conclusion about the marked lack of police involvement or interest in such an attack.

A serious incident has been reported. We can all express our outrage at the driver's behaviour, and our sympathy to the cyclist. Road rage, criminal damage etc are all crimes that have to be investigated by the police, hoping that the cyclist did report this, and as posted others have also reported evidence.


I'm not sure why some feel that this is the opportunity to speculate about the police or go into a rant. If you want to do that start a thread on the Lounge. I'm no fan, but not sure why you have to go into a knee jerk on this thread.


I've suffered from road rage but never to this extent. I tend to try to be in a position to get away from angry drivers. The majority of cyclists and drivers are courteous to each other and happily share road space.


I reported a near miss from a driver weaving in and out of traffic on the Brixton Road many years ago. They almost took out a cyclist, I stopped, encouraged the cyclist to report and then drove (I'd usually have been on my bike). The police knew who I was talking about (it wasn't your stereotypical bad driver) and the cyclist turned up shortly afterwards to put in a proper complaint.


My one issue now rather than then is it was easier to report incidents at a police station and talk to officers. Doing it on line of course brings efficiencies.

If this is reported to the Metropolitan police as a bicycle / driver collision, where the driver did not stop at the scene of the accident, the Met will issue a request for driver information to the license address of the registered car owner.

If this form is not completed an automatic court hearing will be scheduled, for the vehicle owner to explain why they did not respond to the initial letter.

This should open up the details of the incident and hopefully lead to prosecution.

The police stations were closed, police numbers were cut, police priorities were changed. Blame politicians who have done this, not the police!


In ED for example, we used to have a proper police station on Lordship lane and sub police station on crystal palace road and possibly other locations.


The police, like the royal mail and other essential services, have been run in to the ground over the last 20-30 years.



Monkey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The police are a complete disgrace. Bunch of

> useless, useless people. I've lost all respect.

>

> I hope the cyclist is okay. Sending much love and

> support.

>

> I've emailed this report to the London Cycling

> Campaign.

So sorry to hear this. Sadly the online form unlikely to get you anywhere. My partner was attacked by a driver on pomeroy street in nunhead recently: the driver deliberately blocked him, then tried to run him over, then drove through a red light, caught up with him on kender street grabbing him from his bike, slamming him into a wall and only when my partner screamed, attracting a lot of attention, did the driver get back in his car and drive off.

We have heard nothing from the police.

Earlier this year, another driver verbally abused me through Evelina road while I had my small children on the bike; threatened me; kept revving and swerving sideways towards us to frighten us.

I reported online with video, photos and a full number plate.

I have heard nothing from the police.

I?m frightened by the increase in road rage I?ve experienced and witnessed this year and it is absolutely made more frightened by the apparent lack of action/interest by the police.

I gave details of the Dulwich Hill SNT and PCSO details - I have met with Simon PCSO over the years and have found him very responsive in connection with local concerns. The 2 other officers (Gavin and Mark) were moved to a different patch and I am not sure whether new officers have been drafted in to replace them. I suggest your daughter email in with all details.

I reported an incident on line, a driver for some reason bumped into me whilst I was cycling on a cycle lane across a junction. I took a photo, had a witness, but beyond the shock that a two tonne vehicle would bump into me in plain site, there was no harm. I could have fallen into the South Circ. The police took no action, not a surprise, but they did respond to me. If you are unhappy with their response then there is a complaint procedure.


SNT and PCSO's have always responded with courtesy

Pugwash, are the community policing meetings you used to organise still happening during these Covid times? I will definitely turn up at the next one and suggest as many people as possible do. I know the police are understaffed but if we say/do nothing, it will only get worse.


@Monniemae, Malumbu, so sorry to hear about your experiences.



Thank you.

I witnessed something similar (but nowhere near as bad) yesterday.


I was on my bike stopped at a red light going up Turney Road towards Rosendale Road - a cyclist came up behind me, ran the red light and cut up a car coming the other way on green, car leant on the horn and shouted something muffled but obviously pretty rude, cyclist stuck up two fingers and called the driver something incredibly rude, assuming that the driver would continue driving along.


By this time the lights had changed to green for me so I was cycling along the same road as the car and cyclist.


Car was driving along slowly, kerb crawling the cyclist who by this time was up on the pavement - both shouting at each other (lots of "come on then, come over here and say that to my face" on both sides), so I went round the outside of the car and carried cycling along.


About 45 seconds later the same car comes zooming up the road at high speed, goes past me and does that tiny little zig-zag left that drivers sometimes do to cyclists towards me - felt deliberate but couldn't say for certain as there was a traffic island coming up, so I'm pushed in a little bit closer to the cars on the left. But I'm kind of expecting it like I do every time a car goes past me at high speed, so I'd slowed right down and have no problem avoiding it as the driver zooms off.


I don't think my experience is that unusual and it may well have been a similar experience as the cyclist mentioned by the OP. Both the other cyclist and the driver were in the wrong in my view and their inability to accept that they shouldn't have a total right of way to travel on the road as they want, as well as a huge amount of anger and rage at being "disrespected" ended up with a potential issue for other cyclists and drivers that had nothing to do with the original incident. Nothing to do with cyclists vs drivers, but everything to do with poor driving/cycling and that's what I'd like the police to be focused on.


Met police do a regular traffic stop at the crossroads of Blackfriars Road and the Cut on my way into work and they pull up cyclists, mopeds and cars who run the lights or go through close on the pedestrian or cycle phase without reference to the mode of transport - and the result is that people don't run the lights any more like they used to and it's safer all round.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Couldn't agree more with the frustration. I avoid it like the plague but made the mistake of picking up a parcel a couple of months ago and it took them 20 minutes to find it. This was after queuing for an hour. All the pickup parcels were just in a massive heap with no order or organisation so they manually had to search for everything. Bizarre and deeply annoying as if run well it could be a good asset to the Post Office and of course the community. Also, very much agree with the point re not taking it out on counter staff as it must be a terrible and demoralising environment to work in.
    • It's my understanding that it's private delivery companies such as Evri that have the post office as a delivery point so you can't redirect those parcels to Peckham SO as that's only for Royal Mail but, yes, probably worth trying a different drop off point. As you say a lot of the queue is for people dropping off and picking up parcels to and from Evri and other companies, kind of like a private sorting office, and while there is clearly a huge demand for this service, the post office was never designed for the number of parcels it is now required to deal with resulting in long queues and lost or hard to find parcels.  This messes up the efficient provision of other core PO services including cash/bank services now there are no banks in ED. I think this one office is being required to do too much for its size. 
    • I think one of the problems with Lordship Lane is the sheer number of people using it to return items as it is now one of the only Evri parcel return points - I have been in there a few times (with an Evri parcel return I hasten to add) and everyone seemed to be doing the same. Either that or posting bags full of small sized packages each one that took a few minutes to deal with! I agree - it's definitely not working but I don't think the Post Office really cares as the business is on it's knees and I suspect many of the poor staff having to endure it are too.
    • There are a number of reasons for the long wait time and improvements can be made.  The counter staff is inexperienced.  They all started work at the PO in November 2025. There are 5 work stations.  On a normal day there are only 2 of the 5 stations open for service.  On a good day there are 3 workstations open.  On one day just before Christmas there were 4 open.  In all the decades I have been using that PO there has never been an instance of all 5 windows being open. If they could aim for having 3 of the 5 windows open and serving customers at all times that would make a huge difference.  2 windows is not enough. Recruitment and training are problematic.  Sickness is a problem.  I think it is a very stressful work environment.  Please do not complain directly to the counter staff.  They are powerless. I use the PO every day.  6 visits a week.  I run a small business.  I can no longer use LL - I have to travel to a different PO.  Because I visit every day I have had plenty of time to observe and IMO the one service they need to stop immediately is allowing people to collect deliveries directly from the PO.  Why, because that location is not equipped to deal with it.   Here is an example of why it needs to stop.  Today the queue was long with 2 windows open.  One customer was collecting a package.  The package could not be found.  One of the 2 serving staff spent just under 15 minutes (yes, I timed it) looking for the package.  It still wasn't found and the customer left empty handed.  For 15 minutes there was only 1 member of staff attending to the queue - the other was looking for a package.  This happens a lot - I promise you this happens every day. If you are an ED resident considering having your packages redirected to Lordship Lane then please don't.  They cannot efficiently provide this service.  Redirect to the Peckham Sorting Office instead.        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...