Seabag Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Dominic Raab appeared to contradict himself and No 10's claim the PM and staff were pictured during a work meeting and said "sometimes they?ll have a drink after a long day or a long week".He said Downing Street is "fundamentally a place of work" and insisted the actions of those in the picture -Ok, so if you?re ?at a work meeting? then where?s the note books, iPads, laptops etc? I?m not seeing one of these in this ?workplace?, not even a phone in anyone?s hands.Which is unusual,no?https://apple.news/AgcGmgcPRTNSX6qXuoEJMgw Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555266 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 That photo is a great visual metaphor for the Upstairs Downstairs world Johnson and his cabal inhabit.The toffs lording it on the terrace in their comfy seats while the plebs make do with standing around on the grass below. Looking forward to Cold War Steve's take... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555270 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigello Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 I think that if this pic were showing a Labour or LibDem (I know, unlikely) PM then most of the people complaining about Boris J would be cutting them some slack. We all know that England is not as uptight as it was decades ago, and that work and fun blend (not always welcomed. I can't see this as a major solecism - not like the other parties - and I am not a fan of Boris and his band at all. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555275 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 This cuts across party politics.They aren't working and are clearly socialising, no different to going to the pub after work in normal times.Those lucky enough to have a garden weren't allowed to socialise in such numbers.It was literally one rule for them, another for the rest of us... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555291 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabag Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Nigello Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> I think that if this pic were showing a Labour or> LibDem (I know, unlikely) PM then most of the> people complaining about Boris J would be cutting> them some slack. We all know that England is not> as uptight as it was decades ago, and that work> and fun blend (not always welcomed. I can't see> this as a major solecism - not like the other> parties - and I am not a fan of Boris and his band> at all.It?s to do with fobbing us off yet again, gaslighting us. And they?ve used up all their ?slack? as far as most people are concerned. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555304 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigello Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 But they were already in the building, sitting outside. I think it is mischief making and really not the smoking gun that people say/want it to be. (One can believe this and also not be a supporter of Boris. It is called being rational and reasonable and it stops one from being reflexively anti just because it is the default setting.) Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555338 Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCat Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Nigello Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> But they were already in the building, sitting> outside. I think it is mischief making and really> not the smoking gun that people say/want it to be.> (One can believe this and also not be a supporter> of Boris. It is called being rational and> reasonable and it stops one from being reflexively> anti just because it is the default setting.)Come on Nigello, you've been around these parts long enough to know thats not how things work on the EDF:) Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555342 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 so when police were fining people for sitting on park benches or even sending them home at the same time, people should have just said "I'm outside - I'm here anyway"Tug ForelockDoff cap Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555343 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabag Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Nigello Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> But they were already in the building, sitting> outside. I think it is mischief making and really> not the smoking gun that people say/want it to be.> (One can believe this and also not be a supporter> of Boris. It is called being rational and> reasonable and it stops one from being reflexively> anti just because it is the default setting.)That?s fine, they were at the building - agreed.But that isn?t a ?work meeting? yet we?re being cajoled into going along with that, as if we?re mean spirited in not doing so. The whole ?they?re taking time out after the battle against Covid? doesn?t wash either. You don?t see Drs and NHS staff doing the same, no!, they?re actually getting back to work, actually battling covid. However, this is the government, you know the ones who hand down the edicts. Only they?re not following the same ones as we?re given. In that context, you?re still ok with this and their other indiscretions? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555350 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Show us the minutes of the 'meeting'...:) Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555372 Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidKruger Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 My first thought was ?what was the meeting aim, what was the agenda, who took actions, who?s seen the minutes ?? ! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555385 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Can't recall attending any office meeting where the boss' wife was in attendance. Office parties/social get-togethers on the other hand... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555388 Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.a. Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Nigello Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> But they were already in the building, sitting> outside. I think it is mischief making and really> not the smoking gun that people say/want it to be.> (One can believe this and also not be a supporter> of Boris. It is called being rational and> reasonable and it stops one from being reflexively> anti just because it is the default setting.)To me personally it looks very much like a group of people who know they probably shouldn?t be doing what they?re doing, but they feel the rules don?t apply to them.If we hadn?t had all the other revelations then yes, it?d be much ado about nothing. But taken in the wider context it looks very much like 10 Downing St developed the view that they could do as they pleased.As always, this is a result of the person at the top setting the tone? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555399 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 the person at the top very much relies on enough of "the little people" siding with themIrish people of a certain vintage will be very familiar with the Haughey years and similar vibes Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555402 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogkennelhillbilly Posted December 20, 2021 Share Posted December 20, 2021 Nigello Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> i think it is mischief making and really> not the smoking gun that people say/want it to be.It's not "mischief making". It was against the rules which the person in the photo himself made. It was also - in retrospect we now know - probably not that risky considering it was outside.But in any case it's never going to be a smoking gun: anyone who cares already knows Johnson is a liar and a lawbreaker. Anyone who doesn't care won't have their opinion changed by any stupid photo. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555414 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnL Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 diable rouge Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Show us the minutes of the 'meeting'...:)There were none because err it was an informal meeting says Raab the genius.Johnson seems to have lost the darts fans now too. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555466 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555531 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabag Posted December 21, 2021 Share Posted December 21, 2021 Holy FuuckThe Met have gone and referred themselves to the standards watchdogIt?s all getting a little bonkers, no?https://apple.news/Ai5RW9pbpS4a0wtnMJmvYkQ Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555646 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnL Posted December 22, 2021 Share Posted December 22, 2021 Too much #johnsonout and #dickout hashtags on twitter.Could the issue of Crown Immunity be being used by the government here - they won't say so but the Police know its there.Years (30 or so) ago I remember working for a public body that talked about using Crown Immunity for all sorts of stuff - they couldn't in the end. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555661 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogkennelhillbilly Posted December 24, 2021 Share Posted December 24, 2021 I don't know if there's anyone less qualified to give advice on being a good Christian during COVID than Boris Johnson, but here we are: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/dec/24/covid-booster-jab-boris-johnson-christmas-message Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1555996 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnL Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 Jesus also turned water into wine so he has no problem with me drinking it. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1556644 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 Surprised it took this long, kinda suggests someone is deliberately leaking stuff drip by drip...by drip...by drip... Japanese water torture stylee...https://www.itv.com/news/2022-01-10/email-proves-downing-street-staff-held-drinks-party-at-height-of-lockdownEXCL: Email obtained by @itvnews proves over 100 staff were invited to drinks party in No 10 garden at height of lockdown to ?make the most of the lovely weather?.We?re told PM and his wife attended, with staff invited to ?bring your own booze!? Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1558718 Share on other sites More sharing options...
diable rouge Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 And here's what the Met were tweeting on the day of the BYOB party...Have you been enjoying the hottest day of the year so far? 🌞It is important that we all continue to #StayAlertYou can relax, have a picnic, exercise or play sport, as long as you are: ➡️ On your own ➡️ With people you live with ➡️ Just you and one other personNothing to see here eh boys in blue?... Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1558722 Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidKruger Posted January 10, 2022 Share Posted January 10, 2022 diable rouge Wrote:-------------------------------------------------------> Surprised it took this long, kinda suggests> someone is deliberately leaking stuff drip by> drip...by drip...by drip... Japanese water torture> stylee...https://www.itv.com/news/2022-01-10/email> -proves-downing-street-staff-held-drinks-party-at-> height-of-lockdown> > EXCL: Email obtained by @itvnews proves over 100> staff were invited to drinks party in No 10 garden> at height of lockdown to ?make the most of the> lovely weather?.> > We?re told PM and his wife attended, with staff> invited to ?bring your own booze!?I always thought it was Chinese water torture, but hey - I guess no-one?s got the monopoly on torture methods !! Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1558757 Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnL Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 What's Dom doing these days - he seems to be having trouble shopping with the number of shopping trolleys on his blog. Link to comment https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/299494-defending-the-indefensible-another-pm-thread/page/2/#findComment-1558775 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now