Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi ianr,

I've an outstanding query of what if any planning conditions this shop unit has.

As you say nothing on the web so outdated the web.

Suspect officers have to recall files from archive hence delay.


As soon as I have any update I'll post it hear.


Hi sue,

I fish out that post and correct it. Apologies for missing that.


Regards james

  • 4 weeks later...

For those that wish to attend the licensing hearing it will now take place 10am 30 May at room G02A, 160 Tooley Street, SE1.


Please see attached hearing letter, comittee procedures and proforma if you'd like to tell the committee you're going.


We're now trying to one of the East dulwich councillors to change leave from day jobs to cover this. Do tell us if you're planning to attend.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Very Clever meeting when everyone is at work.


xxxxxx


Well people have already have the opportunity to comment if they want, and maybe the council people concerned want to have the meeting during their normal working hours!

Hi Sue,

Planning meetings are during the evening. They use to largely be local but now centred on council HQ at 160 Tooley Street, SE1. Quite close to London Bridge station. So no reason why licensing meetings in theory couldnt be during the evening unless the license applicant is more importants than residents. Te former tend to be a tiny team at most and the latter tend to be many more when contentious.


The trouble is the system is already slanted to favour applicants. The burden of proof is residents proving something will cause harm - a complete reversal of the pre Tessa Jowell 2003 licensing law.


To make it even more painful you have to register at least a week in advance that you're going to go. Hardly a publci meeting.


The obvious thing to do is hld meetings in the day or evening dependant upon the people expressing an interest. If no one is interested use a daytime meeting. IF people have expressed an interest hold it in the evening or a Saturday preferably in the area involved.

Good god is this thread still banginging on???


1, Co-op dont do 24hr stores (only some petrol forecourts).

2, Im quite sure there isnt the trade.

3, They have a night crew that fill the shop at night because the shop is too busy in the day.

4, But most importantly,Has anyone actualy asked the store or headoffice what there plans are???


TT

Well said Sue. To sell food past 11pm you need a licence-reason 1. Reason 2. They are extending their hours of trade including the selling of alcohol. No mystery. I think it will be detrimental to the area but much less so than local bars such as Adventure that already have their licence and so I won't object.
I don't think anything that potentially brings a little convenience to people's lives can be a wholly bad thing, and while I recognise the argument that it may mean more noise for the residents, I suspect the volume of anticipated added 'traffic' to the store is probably being somewhat exaggerated...

All too often these planning decisions, or rather the arguments of the anti's, get mixed with party politics.


Thus if you are not in power you don't want anything beneficial to be agreed by those that are in power. Thus you think up allot of spurious guff about more noise, more drunks emigrating into the area and more road-train sized lorries on the Lane. This excites the easily led and you canter in as their saviour. Again.


Wake up people!!

  • 1 month later...

From Appendix C of the associated papers linked to by James:


"The above application is not for a 24 hours alcohol licence. It is for the sale of alcohol to start from 6am instead of 7am in the

morning and finish at the current time which is 23.00. It also has a request to to include late night refreshment till 05.00.

The premises intends to be open 24hours and technically licensing does not have jurisdiction on these, however comments

can be made on the licensable activities stated above.


kind regards


Dorcas Mills

Principal Licensing Officer

  • 3 months later...

The minutes of the Licensing Sub-committee meeting of 30 May are at last available, at http://moderngov.southwark.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=28894.


On Item 5, the Co-op application, we have:


"The licensing officer advised that this application had been withdrawn by the applicant."

If the coop are daft enough to think that people are stupid and want to shop 24/7 then let them. I cant see there being a huge number of cars fighting for a parking place at 2 am.Most big supermarkets have stopped all hours opening because there was NOT enough demand.

Romnarz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the coop are daft enough to think that people

> are stupid and want to shop 24/7 then let them. I

> cant see there being a huge number of cars

> fighting for a parking place at 2 am.Most big

> supermarkets have stopped all hours opening

> because there was NOT enough demand.


xxxxxx


Perhaps that is why they have withdrawn their application .....

Romnarz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the coop are daft enough to think that people

> are stupid and want to shop 24/7 then let them. I

> cant see there being a huge number of cars

> fighting for a parking place at 2 am.Most big

> supermarkets have stopped all hours opening

> because there was NOT enough demand.


When are people going to understand they hadn't applied for the amendment with the intention to actually use the hours given (if it was granted...) but for the option to do so if they wanted to?!

It's not rocket science.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But is it the Village councillors who are maintaining the board, or someone else? When the boards in East Dulwich were installed, it wasn't the councillors who kept the information up to date, it was Monica from Health Matters, who was greatly involved in various  community matters (eg the building of the community garden at what was then Dulwich Hospital). I can't remember if it was her who initiated the installation of the boards in the first place. She no longer lives in East Dulwich, and nobody else appears to be willing to liaise with the councillors and community related organisations  to take this on for the various East Dulwich boards.  It would hardly take much effort. Basic information doesn't frequently change (and no, I'm not volunteering. I am overstretched as it is). It's all very well to  get a physical  community notice board spruced up, but not much use if it then isn't being used for its intended purpose. And I can't see that it is part of a councillor's job to update notice boards which they didn't initiate in the first place. I'm sure they have more than enough to do.  The notice boards serve (or did do) a useful service, but all the information which could be put on them is surely available elsewhere. (Unless it is bringing to people's attention things which are of use/interest to them and they weren't aware they needed/would like, or didn't know how else to find the information). ETA: Oh. I've just read the beginning of this thread. I'd forgotten how it started. It's gone well off topic, hasn't it. Probably just as well, reading the OP.
    • The board in the Village (just near the pub) is in pristine condition, full of council-related information (though someone had stuck a flyer on the glass, now removed). Maybe the councillors there actually CBA to make use of a facility that took time, effort and taxpayers’ money to instal?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...