Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sainsburys probably closed as they weren't getting the passing trade from a residential part of ED, although they continue to open until midnight. The Co-Op on the other hand would increase the choice available to local residents and users of the bars and restaurants.


I don't live down that part of LL, if the noise particularly on a Friday and Saturday night is already an issue, the opening of a supermarket won't make any difference.


I'd support the Co-op's extension to their licence if they put up signs ensuring customers are mindful of local residents with their noise as the pubs currently do and either pick up the rubbish left behind or contribute to the council cleaning their section of the road.

Correct me if I am wrong ... but the main point of this is the application for a 24 hour alcohol licence. Whilst I can understand the benefit of Co-op staying open for longer hours for general shopping, I completely fail to see the benefit of being able to buy alcohol at 3am. Lordship Lane is busy enough on a Friday/ Saturday night now ... do we really want everyone coming out of the pubs and being able to buy more alcohol. It seems to me Co-op are just hoping to cash in on alcohol sales.


So I object to the proposal for alcohol sales but would welcome longer opening hours for general shopping.


PS James - I live within 100 metres.

I thought that the whole point was that they could trade for 24hrs, the 24hr alcohol thing has been debunked a few posts ago.


Clearly the Coop think that there are enough night workers, insomniacs and late night revellers with the munchies to justify staying open all night. This does not mean their main focus is selling cans of Carlsberg Extra to the befuddled.


The alcohol thing seems to have been created to frighten the masses and allow local populist Politicians to ride to the rescue.

Goose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Correct me if I am wrong ... but the main point of

> this is the application for a 24 hour alcohol

> licence.


xxxxxx


Yes you are wrong.


The application is NOT for a 24 hour alcohol licence.


And now this rumour has been started, people will be opposing the application on completely false grounds.


Forgive me for being cynical, but was that the intention of posting false information on here?


ETA: I don't mean you, Goose.


ETA: James Barber, I think you should post on here apologising for giving incorrect information and making absolutely clear - again, since it seems some people have not read the whole thread or looked at your attached pdf - what the Co-Op's application actually says.


If you don't do that, then I - and I expect others - will draw our own conclusions.

So from this website (below) for application lodged on 27th Feb, open 24 hours but alcohol 0600-2300 (except Sunday).


Has my support but what defines 'late night refreshment'



From: http://app.southwark.gov.uk/licensing/LicPremisesAppliedDetails.asp?systemkey=840448


Operating schedule which accompanied the application form

Expected number of people to attend if more than 5000: Not Applicable

Opening hours: Monday 24hrs. Tuesday 24hrs. Wednesday 24hrs. Thursday 24hrs. Friday 24hrs. Saturday 24hrs. Sunday 24hrs.


Proposed licensable activities (if application relates to conversion of a justices or entertainment licence prior to 7 February 2005 these are the existing licensable activities):


Late night refreshment - indoors:

Monday 23:00 to 05:00

Tuesday 23:00 to 05:00

Wednesday 23:00 to 05:00

Thursday 23:00 to 05:00

Friday 23:00 to 05:00

Saturday 23:00 to 05:00

Sunday 23:00 to 05:00


Sale by retail of alcohol to be consumed off premises:

Monday 06:00 to 23:00

Tuesday 06:00 to 23:00

Wednesday 06:00 to 23:00

Thursday 06:00 to 23:00

Friday 06:00 to 23:00

Saturday 06:00 to 23:00

Sunday 10:00 to 22:30

In favour of the Co-op being open 24/7 - I believe it is now the only place in East Dulwich, or on Lordship Lane anyway that charges keys for key meters for electricity, gas (and water?) - that's as far as I know - some time ago I gave a lift to a young woman with a toddler whose husband was being kept in Kings, having managed to knock himself out with a moving box as they were moving in.


She had got back late, and couldn't find anywhere along Lordship Lane to charge their meter key (house dark and cold) - had to take her to Peckham Road, the nearest place she could do this - located on the bit that is not the most reassuring place to be for a woman at night. Apparently the Texaco garage at Goose Green and the Costcutter used to do it but stopped, and apparently the Co-op is the only place that still has the social awareness and sense of caring to do this. It's not a money-spinner, so good for them.

nowittyname Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In favour of the Co-op being open 24/7 - I believe

> it is now the only place in East Dulwich, or on

> Lordship Lane anyway that charges keys for key

> meters for electricity, gas (and water?) - that's

> as far as I know - some time ago I gave a lift to

> a young woman with a toddler whose husband was

> being kept in Kings, having managed to knock

> himself out with a moving box as they were moving

> in.

>

> She had got back late, and couldn't find anywhere

> along Lordship Lane to charge their meter key

> (house dark and cold) - had to take her to Peckham

> Road, the nearest place she could do this -

> located on the bit that is not the most reassuring

> place to be for a woman at night. Apparently the

> Texaco garage at Goose Green and the Costcutter

> used to do it but stopped, and apparently the

> Co-op is the only place that still has the social

> awareness and sense of caring to do this. It's

> not a money-spinner, so good for them.


Londis which is also 24/7 is a Paypoint retailer as far as I know.

Will the current staff be offered the option of working the different hours or just have to cope with a re-roster ?


On one hand yes it can be good for the consumer, however the impact on the workers and their families should be taken into account to enable such changes before rushing them through. Okay now the argument of at least they have a job bla bla, well if their job changes to such an extent they should have their rights protected.


Any opinions on this ?


I would also like to extent this idea into the thought that extended Sunday hours should be rolled out accross the high street - There is a social impact that should not be disregared.

The Co-op is applying for these extensions not (necessarily) because they wish and desire to use them to their limits, but to give them the opportunity to market-test extended opening - if the customers want it, they will keep it, if they don't, they will revert to current practice - Sainsbury's in DKH could have opened 24/7 Monday-Saturday - tried it and found it wasn't economic. If their only late night customer base is roaring disruptive drunks (normally costing more than they're worth to serve) - which appears to be a fear in this thread, then they probably won't bother.


If they can get existing staff to work longer hours they will, if they can't they will have to employ other people or raise wages.


In the long run the market works as a very efficient system (if you put in some safeguards, very much as back-stops) - trying to second guess it with social engineering or command economy tactics normally is ineffective, and frequently has unintended consequences.

Make Mr Barber Right.



I would like to object to the granting of a 24 hour licence to the co-op at Lordship Lane SE22 for the following reasons:


1. We already have too many outlets for 24 hour Intoxicating liquor licensing in Lordship Lane.


2 The binge drinking and drunks in lordship lane every night has increased tenfold in the last 6 years, owing to the Government and Council policies, allowing night clubs and pubs to extend their drinking hours till the early hours of the morning, in residential areas, most of the time causing a nuisance to local residents.


3. We already have a parking problem at the end of Ashbourne Grove during the day time, and this is gradually getting worse of a night time, due to the clubs and pubs having extended hours, and to add, another outlet, all night will attract more cars and drunks to the area, causing more pollution and trouble to the area.


I thought the council and the Government wanted to cut down on people binge drinking, yet now you are saying, you can drink twenty four seven. We will help you drink more by allowing twenty four seven drinking outlets.

Really don?t make sense. You are, by allowing this, encouraging binge drinking, all day and night.

Along with, ruining resident?s good way of life that they have enjoyed for years. I for one know that the area of Dulwich that I live in has slowly been deteriorating, through bad governments and councils changes to making profits and putting businesses profits in front of residents who have paid good money for their properties in order to live a nice peaceful life in a good environments?. That you are now destroying.

Worker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are employment laws in place to protect the

> workers. You're going deep when you consider the

> effect on workers of a single store's request to

> extend opening hours.



Yes there are workers rights and employment laws but a wider impact on our society at large must be taken into account. It's becoming common place for such shops to open these kind of hours.


Many parts of central europe still have no opening on Sundays, 9-5 normal hours and are all the better for it - There aappears to be far less social disruption. I'm no expect on this matter nor an ecomnomist but we must take stock of our community and how we want it.


It's not just this co-op but all co-ops, tescos, sainsburys, house of fraisers, debenhams, spar .... the list is endless.


The end game for us is a 24/7 society with no ownership of our social environment.


The affect on staff is just my argument - there are many others.

Yeah, right on. In fact, I suggest that shops should only be allowed to between 10am and 1pm.


And on the Sabbath, such things should be totally prohibited as we should be dedicating ourselves to thanking the Lord (for he hath given us fish fingers and Haagen Dazs ice cream).


Or we could join the 21st century.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...