Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Legal requirements; shmegal requirements.


In practice 'the fuzz' are not going to stop you for having the wrong light setting (or prob. even no lights, unfortunately). It is more of a question of alerting your presence to the motorists and other road users, inc. pedestrians.


Also, a lower-mounted light (eg. on your bike) is more visible to a car than one one your bag or worse on your helmet. These are serving almost no useful purpose to the misguided rider (sorry Loz!).

I am a car driver and a cyclist. I know how hard it is to see cyclists through a less than clean windscreen or when it's raining or misted up, so I always have my lights on the flashing option because they are a lot more visible to car drivers.


I used to have a light on my bike and one on my helmet for lorries to see, but I don't use a helmet anymore because I find them restrictive, so usually wear a hi viz jacket.


It surprises me when I am driving a car and I see people cycling with low lights or no extra visability gear, because they are often really difficult to see. The fact that you have to look through a windscreen reduces visability straight away, and then like I said if the windscreen in misted up or dirty, or it's raining or even if the sun is low and shining into the car cyclists are very difficult to see. Add to that the fact that many people have eyesight problems and may have weak or no glasses - cyclists need to make themselves as visible as possible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for taking the trouble to do the calculation.  To be honest, it’s never occurred to me to report it online.  I’ll have to look into it.  I’ve just spoken to the ‘helpline’ and, after listening to ten minutes of some, admittedly, not too disagreeable jazz music, eventually got through to the call centre.  After a lot of to-ing and fro-ing, during which the operator was clearly reciting from a script, the essential question of why I continue to be billed by the RV method, despite their insistence on fitting a meter three years ago, went unresolved.  At first they couldn’t confirm whether I had a meter at all (not their department) but then agreed that I do have one but that it’s ’inactive’ (despite clearly recording usage as detailed above). I was told to contact the ‘meter department’ separately on a different number (Mon-Fri only) and was then asked if I wanted to sign up for various ‘pensioner’ benefits, none of which I understood (probably because I am a pensioner) before being asked to provide ‘feedback’, which I politely declined.  Looking forward to listening to some more jazz on Monday morning though.
    • That would be 78.231 m3, that is 78,231 liters.  The average water consumption per person in the UK is around 141 liters per day I believe.  So I'd say you're doing very well 👍 Have you tried to report your reading online?
    • Apart from potentially saving money (which TBF is more likely if there are fewer people living in your home) it is better for the environment to have a  water meter,  as you have an incentive to use less water. But roll on the re-nationalisation (is that a word?) of the water companies, before our green and pleasant land is covered with raw sewage. And so that the money from our water bills goes to improve the infrastructure rather than lining the pockets of already rich people. Vote Green! Ooops sorry, that's another thread.
    • Trailers on I-player. The loss of cricket from terrestrial telly
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...