Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Legal requirements; shmegal requirements.


In practice 'the fuzz' are not going to stop you for having the wrong light setting (or prob. even no lights, unfortunately). It is more of a question of alerting your presence to the motorists and other road users, inc. pedestrians.


Also, a lower-mounted light (eg. on your bike) is more visible to a car than one one your bag or worse on your helmet. These are serving almost no useful purpose to the misguided rider (sorry Loz!).

I am a car driver and a cyclist. I know how hard it is to see cyclists through a less than clean windscreen or when it's raining or misted up, so I always have my lights on the flashing option because they are a lot more visible to car drivers.


I used to have a light on my bike and one on my helmet for lorries to see, but I don't use a helmet anymore because I find them restrictive, so usually wear a hi viz jacket.


It surprises me when I am driving a car and I see people cycling with low lights or no extra visability gear, because they are often really difficult to see. The fact that you have to look through a windscreen reduces visability straight away, and then like I said if the windscreen in misted up or dirty, or it's raining or even if the sun is low and shining into the car cyclists are very difficult to see. Add to that the fact that many people have eyesight problems and may have weak or no glasses - cyclists need to make themselves as visible as possible.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...