Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's nothing to do with where u hang I have seen people and there relationships and how people are treated yh some women are just as bad men but coming out of a relationship which I was knocked about in I'm sure u can see we're in coming from and I'm not say all men are like that because there are some good ones

I like being single and have been for two years now. I've gone solo for longer than that in the past and so it really doesn't bother me. I'm used to it. I'm comfortable in my own skin. I enjoy my solitude and my own company. I like my own space. I love the sense of irresponsibility it gives you. You get a great sense of freedom when you're unattached. You're free to do whatever you want with whoever and whenever you want and don't have to seek permission from your significant other to do so. You can be totally selfish and not feel guilty about it.

There have been many times when I've been in relationships and felt kind of trapped. I get to feeling claustrophobic and I want break out and be on my own again and I've had to end things. Sometimes I've regretted that and sometimes it's been a relief to get away.

I love women and really enjoy their company. I count myself very lucky to have so many of them as my mates. I just can't really see myself settling down with anyone in particular. It's never really happened for me in that respect. Maybe that's my tragedy... or maybe not.

Love is a revolutionary act. It attacks the ego and in its highest form, is transcendental. Jah is speaking his own truth but missing out on a fundamental aspect of what it means to be human. We are social animals. The closer the bonds, the more challenged we are in resisting the ego.

Fabricio the Guido Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Love is a revolutionary act. It attacks the ego

> and in its highest form, is transcendental. Jah is

> speaking his own truth but missing out on a

> fundamental aspect of what it means to be human.

> We are social animals. The closer the bonds, the

> more challenged we are in resisting the ego.



That's very profound. I wouldn't say I'm missing out though. Depends on how your wiring's programmed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...