Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, I have been told off for limiting the past post to men over 30, so to counter balance it here is a version for ladies


After much thought I have come up with a survey for all of the women on the forum who are over 30 (and the age is key to the choices, but I suspect that younger women may also want to vote on this)


Simple question, given the choices below, who would you most like to be taken out on a date by if they were a real life person (or alive today) and also include your reason why ?


a) DCI Gene Hunt

b) Fraiser

c) Fred Fintstone

d) Dr Who (any incarnation but state which)

e) Alan Sugar (slight bending of the rules here)

f) Tucker Jenkins (ahh the old days of Grange Hill but pre deadenders)

g) Jesus or one of the other 12 fellas (again state which)

h) Jack Bauer

i) inspector Clouseau (there is a minky with a berm)

j) Superman

k) Daniel Mead (mode !!!)

l) Ethan Hunt (you know played by that short fella who had everyone on hello)

m) James Bond (any incarnation)


No other choices allowed (although I bet someone decides different)

Ok, after some serious thought and time on google images....


Definitely Sean Connery's Bond.

It was between him and Pierce Brosnan's Bond, but can't choose Brosnan on principle since he did that terrible L'Oriel advert.


As for the rest...


a) DCI Gene Hunt Yuk

b) Fraiser Hhmmm, maybe for the sort of date that ends with a chaste kiss at the door, but no more

c) Fred Flintstone No

d) Dr Who (any incarnation but state which) If I had to choose one it would be Paul McGann, but not keen

e) Alan Sugar (slight bending of the rules here) No. No. No. No. Never

f) Tucker Jenkins (ahh the old days of Grange Hill but pre deadenders) Sorry Tucker, but no, it's the mole

g) Jesus or one of the other 12 fellas (again state which) No, what would my grandmother say?

h) Jack Bauer He's a definite maybe

i) inspector Clouseau (there is a minky with a berm) Um, no. Seem to be saying that a lot

j) Superman Well, who wouldn't be curious?

k) Daniel Mead (mode !!!) Third after the two Bonds

l) Ethan Hunt (you know played by that short fella who had everyone on hello) Oh no. The eyebrows, the funny nose, the height, the scientology freakiness (ok, ok I know it's supposed to be the character, but some things can't be ignored

m) James Bond (any incarnation) Yes! In order - Connery, Brosnan, Craig, then if I had to Moore, Lazenby, Dalton


Of course this is all completely hypothetical, my real perfect date is bignumber5 every time. :))

Dear God, LuvPeckham, what are you offering here??!! Do you not like us very much? No Clooney, no Hugh Laurie (mmmmm), no Byron, no that-cute-bloke-from-CSI, no Hektor...


a) DCI Gene Hunt

Who? Whaa..? OK, have just Wiki'd him. He looks awfully cross. No.


b) Fraiser

Assume you mean Frasier? Clearly we are soul mates since I too am a pedant, but I'm afraid I'm going to have to say no. Unless I had insomnia, or else had developed some sort of cleaning mania, and could soothe myself by polishing his pate.


c) Fred Fintstone

Dim and fat - or is he Fred Flintstone's saucy younger cousin? (sorry, see point on pedantry above). No. And drives a car with his own feet! I mean, it's just not practical. Besides, I'd be a bit scared of Wilma finding out.


d) Dr Who (any incarnation but state which)

Can only remember Tom Baker and now would probably ruin the date and annoy him by making him do lots of his voiceovers during dinner (ooh ooh, do the Little Britain one! Do the Channel 4 one!) Best to avoid ruining the relationship by not starting it. But quite like the idea of dating a Time Lord. Whooo-hoooo! Don't you think a Time Lord could do lots of fiendishly naughty things with dimensions? Hmmm...


Sorry, lost focus there.


e) Alan Sugar (slight bending of the rules here)

Not if he built me a yacht of diamonds and let me punch him in the snoot every hour on the hour. Ugh. Ugh!!!! UGH!!!!!!! Horrid swaggering bullyboy, and what's WITH his hair? And I bet he has absolutely no conversation. This is an appalling thing to say, but I'd rather date Donald Trump.


f) Tucker Jenkins (ahh the old days of Grange Hill but pre deadenders)

Who? Sorry, Mum wouldn't let me watch Grange Hill.


g) Jesus or one of the other 12 fellas (again state which)

Nope, neither Big Daddy nor one of his merry men. I don't want to blaspheme so I'll just say I think I'd be happier with a guy not married to his job. And the disciples weren't very cool: doubting, betraying or just plain misogynistic: yes, St. Paul I am talking about you.


h) Jack Bauer

Are you kidding?? I'd be blown up by the US government / kidnapped by crazed terrorists / shot by aliens before we'd finished the soup course. I mean, he's sexy and everything but not worth the risk


i) inspector Clouseau (there is a minky with a berm)

Now we're getting somewhere. Not bad, not bad and definitely worth a giggle. However, going to have to say no, because as soon as we got down to the biz, bloody Cato would pop up and ruin everything. On a slight tangent I also wouldn't date Peter Sellers, poor depressed man.


j) Superman

No, too clean cut and smug and probably therefore rubbish at the horizontal tango. Would almost certainly fold his arms and lecture me about leaving my pants on the floor, and what's sexy about that?


k) Daniel Mead (mode !!!)

Who? Am I really ignorant? I don't know half of these people, and I'm certainly over 30. Oh hang on, the pretty boy from Ugly Betty with the girlish freckles. I'm not a cradle-snatcher just yet. No.


l) Ethan Hunt (you know played by that short fella who had everyone on hello)

Oh really no. Talk about Napoleon syndrome. Oh, I suppose I'm talking about the actor, aren't I? But the self-satisfied, slightly mad on adrenaline, definitely onanistic glitter in the eye belongs to both men. And he's short, and I'm not. I know that's a bit snobby, but what's a girl to do when she likes shoes?


m) James Bond (any incarnation)

Sean Connery's Bond - no, he'd only beat me. Roger Moore's Bond - no, the eyebrows are just too annoying. The Aussie bloke - no, would be too bitter about being the rubbish Bond. Timothy Dalton's Bond - no, too drippy and philosophical. Daniel Craig's Bond - no, silly pants and looks like a blond gorilla. I've heard of fit, but that's ridiculous! Pierce Brosnan's Bond... oh, I can't be bothered with this. Just no. But wait! David Niven played Bond, and he was a fox. Phew! Saved by the bell.


So what are the other 2 threads? Watching with interest.

Thirded, Sean Connery for me (especially as he got older)!


Dont know alot of the others but wouldnt say nay to Jesus (Robert Powell version), and might consider Alan Sugar for a date. I adore Fraiser but would only want the conversation.

Definitely David Niven for the Bond.


The Brigadier rather than any of the Doctors.


Jack Bauer's Dad (Donald Sutherland).


Gene Hunt if I'd had rather too many.


(on the pedantry front, St Paul wasn't a disciple) I'd go for Thaddeus - cool name.

Jack Bauer - firstly 'cos "Jack" is just a cool name, and secondly because he'd give you an evening you'd never forget - but only a date - I wouldn't want to have a relationship with the cold-hearted son of a .........


I don't think I want a relationship with any of them.

>:D<


Ha! trust you to bring that one up! I've been trying to forget I ever posted that! (done in a moment of madness) I have since apologised and said to him I didn't know he was a selective vegetarian or I wouldn't have bothered! He has since admitted he was a knob end (re the "well aint you going to finish me off then" comment and "I don't really do .... blah blah" comments and has gone his merry way to find someone who'll put up with his self satisfying love making.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...