Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Has anyone recently recovered from Covid and then flown to the US? We're hoping to travel at Christmas but won't be able to take a PCR test before travel as we'll still test positive for Covid then (it will be within the 90 days from our positive Covid test). The US says we need a letter from a healthcare provider proving a recovery from Covid but our GP surgery has just confirmed that they won't provide said letter. Not sure how we get around this! Any advice warmly welcomed. Thank you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/296234-travel-after-covid-recovery/
Share on other sites

We're hoping to travel at Christmas but won't be able to take a PCR test before travel as we'll still test positive for Covid then (it will be within the 90 days from our positive Covid test)


You need to check with your GP - but I would expect you to test 'clear' (negative) within 14 days of no symptoms - some suggest 10 days. You would still expect antibodies in 90 days - but that's good - shows you are still actively able to attack a new infection.


You could still test positive more than 14 days after symptoms go (or after a positive test if it's asymptomatic) - but you could try it out with lateral flow tests before committing to a PCR. 90 days is a very wide estimate. Our own quarantine rules (England) have set a 14 day limit for quarantine.

Thanks so much Penguin68. Unfortunately, one can continue to test positive for 90 days after a positive case of Covid. When I spoke to our GP surgery earlier today, they confirmed this. Of course, one isn't contagious but the virus just remains in the system. Makes it a bit difficult for travel!
one can continue to test positive for 90 (My emphasis). Your GP is right, but I would certainly get yourselves tested closer to the day of departure (and lateral flows would be a good first step) - although you can it doesn't mean you will. And you could be clear (negative) much earlier.

I think there may be some confusion about the 90 day testing window including at your GP, although I'm not sure it helps your specific situation.


The reason that testing does not take place within 90 days of a positive Covid test is not because you can still be infectious for Covid (assuming you are only infected once) but because there is an increased risk of a false positive result and it would lead to people isolating unnecessarily.


So you could well take the test within 90 days and it would be negative in which case you can travel. The problem is that you might test positive, it would likely be a false positive, and you would be in a difficult position (Which is why the recommendation is the letter from a healthcare provider, but if your doctor won't give you this, I'm not sure who could).

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...
I look at you and understand that I can't afford to take the risk of buying tickets to other countries just for the holidays. There is still a good chance that flights will be canceled or new rules will emerge. I became accustomed to visit website and find interesting meetings near my house. I will travel only when I am sure that my trip will not be cancelled.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good advice Kipper!  The 1.0 early Ecoboost and 1.2 Puretech engines have wet cam belts that fail and failure with a cam belt invariably result in catastrophic  damage to valves and pistons. Later ones were changed to chains. Avoid at all costs!
    • Sorry. Link wasn't working on my phone, but it is now, and I couldn't delete the post.
    • Sent you a pm
    • I think there's a fair number of "participating" sub offices that do passports or, at least, play the "check and send" game (£16 for glancing at your form), so some degree of cherry-picking seems to be permitted. Though it does look as if Post Offices "Indentity Services" are where it things the future lies, and "Right to Rent" (though it's more an eligibility check) looks a bit of an earner, along with DBS checks and the Age Verification services that, if the government gets its way, we'll all need to subscribe to before we're allowed on mumsnet. Those services, incidentally, seem mostly outsourced to an outfit called "Yoti", a privately-owned, loss-making "identity platform" with debts of £150m, a tardy approach to filings, and a finger in a bunch of questionable pies ("Passive Facial Liveness Recognition" sounds gloriously sinister) so what the Post Office gets out of the arrangement isn't clear, but I'm sure they think it worthwhile. That said, they once thought the same of funeral plans which, for some peculiar reason, failed to set fire to the shuffling queues, even metaphorically. For most, it seems, Post Office work is mostly a dead loss, and even the parcel-juggling is more nuisance than blessing. As a nonchalant retailer of other people's services the organisation can only survive now on the back of subsidies, and we're not even sure what they are. The taxpayer-funded subsidies from government (a £136m hand-out to keep Horizon going, £1bn for its compensation scheme, around £50m for the network, and perhaps a loan or two) are clearish, but the cross-subsidies provided by other retail activities in branches are murkier. As are the "phantom shortfalls" created by the Horizon system, which secretly lined Post Office's coffers as postmasters balanced the books with contributions from their own pockets. Those never showed up in the accounts though - because Horizon *was* the accounting system - so we can't tell how much of a subsidy that was. We might get an idea of the scale, however, from Post Office's belated Horizon Shortfall Scheme, which is handing £75k to every branch that's complained, though it's anyone's guess if that's fair or not. Still, that's all supposed to be behind us now, and Post Office's CEO-of-the-week recently promised an "extra" £250m a year for the branches (roughly enough to cover a minimum wage worker in each), which might make it worth the candle for some. Though he didn't expect that would happen before 2030 (we can only wonder when his pension will mature) and then it'd be "subject to government funding", so it might have to be a very short candle as it doesn't look like a promise that he can make. Still, I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from applying for a franchise, and it's possible that, this time, Post Office will be telling the truth. And, you never know, we might all be back in the Post Office soon, and eagerly buying stamps, if only for existence permits, rather than for our letters.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...