Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well Dave, what I think is that my telegraph link was reporting and your telegraph piece was opinion


As for efficient models, what is the target level of efficiency? If we accept we don't want to be where we are, where do we want to be?


% of GDP?

Some other measure?


http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS


It irks me when defenders of the nhs concept are dismissed as ideologues while reformers see themselves as above such na?vet?

Thing is, if you regard the NHS as essentially inviolable in its present form you are taking an ideological stance by defintion. The basic principle of the NHS is that all public health provision is provided through a single, public, tax funded organisation, directly answerable to central government, and that the provision is free at the point of delivery. It is a model that automatically precludes any other model being deployed (note the NHS ban on co-funding). Supporting the maintenance of the status quo necessarily implies a belief that this model is better than any other and, crucially, that no other model should be tried "the NHS is being privatised/betrayed/undermined!!!).


I don't think that is a sensible, or rationally defensible position. I apologise if you find that irksome.

Even if one objectively agreed with all of the changes currently underway, it would be foolish to trust the current precarious government to implement them properly


It's almost as if they know they are doomed so are pushing as fast as possible (see also major and rail privatisation)


Now THAT is ideology in action

first mate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am told by a number of extremely stressed

> friends within the 'system' at Director level,

> that the damage (and damage is the word) is

> irrevocable.


If your friends are at Director level surely they can make things / change happen / prevent the wrong kind of change happening? After all that's the role of senior management?


The majority of GPs I interact with are in favour of the recent changes and the fact that they have the financial clout to make choices. They do not, as was the case last year for a Primary Care Trust I know, have to contract with a large and bureaucratic NHS Trust with poor cardiac surgery outcomes in order to bolster its flagging finances - they can, instead, send their patient(s) to the hospital / unit / specialist that they deem best for the patient.


When I was in the NHS I was frustrated at the slow pace of change, the lacklustre approach to quality and the, relatively, poor quality of junior management - tho there were pockets of incredibly bright, strong and effective management also. However, in the face of problems I did manage to make my little bit of the NHS a little bit better - more cost effective, more customer focussed, more responsive.


I left to manage a medium sized private hospital where I was responsible for everything and now a decade or so later I'm managing the equivalent of a medium sized DGH and again responsible for the clinical and commercial effectiveness of the service and where patients are, absolutely, at the centre of what we do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • As a result of the Horizon scandal it now seems very clear that the Post Office management are highly disingenuous and not be trusted!  There needs to be a campaign launched to challenge the threatened closure, unless the Post Office can demonstrate beyond doubt that the branch is loss making - and even then it could argued that better management could address this. I hope the local media take this up and our MP  and a few demonstrations outside wouldn’t do any harm. Bad publicity can be very effective!         
    • Unlikely. It would take a little more than a bit of Milton to alter the pH of eighty-odd thousand gallons of water.
    • It actually feels as though what I said is being analytically analysed word by word, almost letter by better. I really don't believe that I should have to explain myself to the level it seems someone wants me to. Clearly someones been watching way too much Big Brother. 
    • Sadly they don't do the full range of post office services
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...