Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In the last week I've had 3 tradespeople visit our home. Two to do a job and one to give me advice on another. On meeting them at the door and whenever we had to be in the same room, I wore a mask.


None of the three wore a mask, asked if I wanted them to wear masks or commented on why I was wearing a mask. Am I behind the times in thinking this is a bit rude? Ironically one of them has had Covid, and still has little sense of smell or taste.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295481-mask-wearing-for-visitors/
Share on other sites

I think you're totally justified feeling it's a bit rude. It's your home, and to see that you're wearing one and then not even offer is def rude (or at a very minimum, acknowledge the issue and apologise if they don't have one with them).


Forget covid, it's not even about the covid rules, it's about the rule of common sense when in someone else's home....it's not dissimilar to if someone saw you take your shoes off to go into certain rooms in your own house, and the visitor didn't offer to do the same.

Given it?s not a legal requirement and that most adults are double jabbed I can see why people don?t automatically think they need to wear one if they?re a tradesperson. If you?re concerned ask that they do so, ideally a day before they arrive. As for the shoes, most people I know and have ever known don?t take their own shoes off or ask me to do so. It?s your house so just ask visitors to do what you?d like them to do and don?t rely on people picking up on messages they?re unlikely to intuit.

What Seph said, despite the vaccine our R rate is still around 1.


Common sense should tell a tradesperson that at some point they will encounter someone who would prefer them to wear a mask, so keeping one to hand for such an eventuality would be the sensible thing to do...

I know it's odd that in other countries, the electorate hold their governments responsible for their actions - but not those in England


If there is a different reason than English people not wearing masks as a consequence of Johnson and the Govt saying - "you don't need to", whilst other countries tred a different path, please do spell it out. It's not even a controversial statement is it? Johnson wears it with pride


Nobody needs to be quite so defensive of bad govt decisions - if it was labour in power, people would have been blaming them much more explicitly for everything from fuel and food shortages to covid deaths

I detest this government but please stop making simplistic comments. They have shed loads of evidence on the attitude of society and are informed both by the hard and soft science. They've made a pigs ear out of much of the response, particularly in the early days, but have come up with a policy, like it or not that we are now out of lockdown and therefore do not need to socially distance or wear masks.


Oh and your house, your rules.

"I detest this government but please stop making simplistic comments. "


I have a feeling you are about to type a bunch of simplistic comments.. (without being explicit about what was simplistic about mine)


and you did



" like it or not that we are now out of lockdown and therefore do not need to socially distance or wear masks. "


well given 1000 people a week are still dying here, I'll go with "not like it"


This isn't normal behaviour - to have 1000 people a week dying, and everyone just shrug. It's not happening any comparable country at that per capita level

as for the "your house your rules thing" - I think I agree with pretty much everyone on this


Only...


On a practical level, getting workmen is harder than ever these days (don't know if you've heard. There are "reasons" but people don't like talking about that either)


My experience is when coming around for a quote there is a semi-effort made by trades to "you want me to wear a mask?" - but anything thereafter, has multiple guys show up without masks and effectively crack on. Alternative is to live with these peoples for weeks/months resenting you in your own home for making them wear a mask. Or telling them to do one and get someone else - not an easy thing to do

Dying of what? We know the numbers of people are dying within a month of testing positive for a Covid but that doesn?t mean they are dying of Covid. The media were forced into making this distinction a while ago, would be good if forum users could do the same.


AM - just be politely assertive and ask, in advance if possible, for masks to be worn and shoes to be removed. Perhaps have a stock of disposable masks and overshoes to hand.

The 2 guys that came, were here to complete a job that was half done a couple of months ago. I made it clear to the company before the first visit (2 different guys),that we were cautious about Covid and wanted whoever was coming to respect that. They did. Not so this time. Perhaps I should have advised the company that we were still 'cautious', though I shouldn't have needed to.


The other guy I've known for a number of years as he has done several jobs for us. I was a bit surprised by him and didn't say anything. Maybe I will next time, as he is due to visit again.

Didn?t the ?Government? say comparisons with other countries were meaningless 🤔

(But they didn?t mention that?s because those comparisons expose the true state we?re in)



Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wouldn?t that distinction be pertinent in other

> countries too missus?

Vallance today - masks not explicitly mentioned but seems pretty clear they are part of what he is referring to


"

The UK government?s chief scientific adviser has said acting sooner and harder is the best way to deal with the spread of a future variant of Covid.


Sir Patrick Vallance said his job is ?not to sugarcoat? the reality or tell ministers what they want to hear, but instead to ensure they understand what the science currently is.


He said his ?mantra? throughout the pandemic has been that action needs to be taken sooner than it appears to be needed, PA Media reported.


In a wide-ranging interview on BBC Radio 4, Sir Patrick said:


My mantra for a long time during this [pandemic] has been... ?You?ve got to go sooner than you want to in terms of taking interventions. You?ve got to go harder than you want to, and you?ve got to go more geographically broad than you want to?.


And that is the Sage advice. And that?s what I?ve been saying. And I will say it going forward and the Prime Minister knows that?s what I think. And he knows that?s what I would do in that situation."

You only have to look across the Atlantic to see a 'massive case of collective denial' i.e. Trump, so it's very likely already happening here with Johnson. I guess it's a product of the social media age we live in, the populists are gaming it better than the rest...
As for wearing masks indoors by workpeople....? Because there is no official rule, people are using their own rules. I think that is fair enough, at this stage in the pandemic. If you want someone you have in your home whose vaccine status you don't know, just ask them to wear one or go away! Simple

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I?m falling out of love with the UK.

> Question is, where to go.



I'll agree with the person that's called me a 'near' racist and a bastard....


Even a bastard can agree that this country is getting tough going.....time to move I think....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...