Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

This was the guy who tried to pay a bill with a drawing of a spider. Remember him?


From: David Thorne


Date: Thursday 21 May 2009 10.16am


To: Helen Bailey


Subject: Pets in the building




Dear Helen,




Thankyou for your letter concerning pets in my apartment. I understand that having dogs in the apartment is a violation of the agreement due to the comfort and wellbeing of my neighbours and I am currently soundproofing my apartment with egg cartons as I realise my dogs can cause quite a bit of noise. Especially during feeding time when I release live rabbits.




Regards, David.








From: Helen Bailey


Date: Thursday 21 May 2009 11.18am


To: David Thorne


Subject: Re: Pets in the building




Hello David




I have received your email and wish to remind you that the strata agreement states that no animals are allowed in the building regardless of if your apartment is soundproof. How many dogs do you have at the premises?




Helen








From: David Thorne


Date: Thursday 21 May 2009 1.52pm


To: Helen Bailey


Subject: Re: Re: Pets in the building




Dear Helen,




Currently I only have eight dogs but one is expecting puppies and I am very excited by this. I am hoping for a litter of at least ten as this is the number required to participate in dog sled racing. I have read every Jack London novel in preparation and have constructed my own sled from timber I borrowed from the construction site across the road during the night. I have devised a plan which I feel will ensure me taking first place in the next national dog sled championships. For the first year of the puppies life I intend to say the word mush then chase them violently around the apartment while yelling and hitting saucepan lids together. I have estimated that the soundproofing of my apartment should block out at least sixty percent of the noise and the dogs will learn to associate the word mush with great fear so when I yell it on race day, the panic and released adrenaline will spur them on to being winners. I am so confident of this being a foolproof plan that I intend to sell all my furniture the day before the race and bet the proceeds on coming first place.




Regards, David.








From: Helen Bailey


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 9.43am


To: David Thorne


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




David, I am unsure what to make of your email. Do you have pets in the apartment or not?




Helen








From: David Thorne


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 11.27am


To: Helen Bailey


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




Dear Helen,




No. I have a goldfish but due to the air conditioner in my apartment being stuck on a constant two degrees celcius, the water in its bowl is iced over and he has not moved for a while so I do not think he is capable of disturbing the neighbours. The ducks in the bathroom are not mine. The noise which my neighbours possibly mistook for a dog in the apartment is just the looping tape I have of dogs barking which I play at high volume while I am at work to deter potential burglars from breaking in and stealing my tupperware. I need it to keep food fresh. Once I ate leftover chinese that had been kept in an unsealed container and I experienced complete awareness. The next night I tried eating it again but only experienced chest pains and diarrhoea.




Regards, David.








From: Helen Bailey


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 1.46pm


To: David Thorne


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




Hello David




You cannot play sounds of dogs or any noise at a volume that disturbs others. I am sure you can appreciate that these rules are for the benefit of all residents of the building. Fish are fine. You cannot have ducks in the apartment though. If it was small birds that would be ok.




Helen








From: David Thorne


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 2.18pm


To: Helen Bailey


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




Dear Helen,




They are very small ducks.




Regards, David.








From: Helen Bailey


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 4.06pm


To: David Thorne


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




David, under section 4 of the strata residency agreement it states that you cannot have pets. You agreed to these rules when you signed the forms. These rules are set out to benefit everyone in the building including yourself. Do you have a telephone number I can call you on to discuss?




Helen








From: David Thorne


Date: Friday 22 May 2009 5.02pm


To: Helen Bailey


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




Dear Helen,




The ducks will no doubt be flying south for the winter soon so it will not be an issue. It is probably for the best as they are not getting along very well with my seventeen cats anyway. .




Regards, David.








From: Helen Bailey


Date: Monday 25 May 2009 9.22am


To: David Thorne


Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Pets in the building




David, I am just going to write on the forms that we have investigated and you do not have any pets.




Helen

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-210994
Share on other sites

The BNP further highlighted their stupidity and ignorance last week by flyering a group of Jamaican men in Brixton.


They were trying to attract the vote of the Rasta Far Right.

___________________________________________________________


Nick Griffin was very upset that the eggs thrown at him outside Westminster still contained their yolks - he only likes the whites.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-211364
Share on other sites

Paddy was unemployed and had few qualifications, so he decided to apply for a job on a local building site.


The foreman wasn't too sure about Paddy's experience, so he decided to ask him a simple test question:

?What is the difference between a girder and joist??


?That's easy,? replied Paddy, ?Goethe wrote Faust and Joyce wrote Ulysses!?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-212072
Share on other sites

Gordon Brown was visiting a primary school. In one class they were in the middle of a discussion related to words and their meanings. The teacher asked Mr. Brown if he would like to lead the discussion on the word tragedy'.


So the illustrious leader asked the class for an example of a tragedy.


A little boy stood up and offered: 'If my best friend, who lives on a farm, is playing in the field & a tractor runs over him and kills him, that would be a tragedy'.


No, said Gordon - that would be an accident'.


A little girl raised her hand: 'If a school bus carrying fifty children drove over a cliff, killing everyone inside, that would be a tragedy'.


I'm afraid not,? explained Gordon, ?that's what we would call great loss?.


The room went silent. No other children volunteered.


Gordon searched the room. 'Isn't there someone here who can give me an example of a tragedy?'.


Finally, at the back of the room, little Johnny raised his hand. In a quiet voice he said 'If a plane carrying you and Mr. Darling was struck by a 'friendly fire' missile & blown to smithereens, that would be a tragedy'.


Fantastic!' exclaimed Gordon. 'That's right. And can you tell me why that would be tragedy?'.


Well,' says little Johnny 'it has to be a tragedy, because it certainly wouldn't be a great loss and it probably wouldn't be a f*cking accident either'.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-212491
Share on other sites

Money


It is August. In a small town on the South Coast of France, holiday season

is in full swing, but it is raining so there is not too much business

happening. Everyone is heavily in debt. Luckily, a rich Russian tourist

arrives in the foyer of the small local hotel. He asks for a room and puts

a 100 euro note on the reception counter, takes a key and goes to inspect

the room located up the stairs on the third floor.


The hotel owner takes the banknote in hurry and rushes to his meat

supplier to whom he owes 100 euro.


The butcher takes the money and races to his wholesale supplier to pay his

debt.


The wholesaler rushes to the farmer to pay 100 euro for pigs he purchased some

time ago.


The farmer triumphantly gives the 100 euro note to a local prostitute who gave

him her services on credit.


The prostitute goes quickly to the hotel, as she owed the hotel for her

hourly room use to entertain clients.


At that moment, the rich Russian is coming down to reception and informs

the hotel owner that the proposed room is unsatisfactory and takes his

100 euro back and departs.


There was no profit or income. But everyone no longer has any debt and the

small town people look optimistically towards their future.


COULD THIS BE THE SOLUTION TO THE Global Financial Crisis? Or, is there a

catch here?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-212540
Share on other sites

Well it's not strictly valid, as all of these were not only debtors, but also creditors. It's a perception trick.


In isolation, each of these not only owed 100 euros but were due 100 euros, so their 'current account' was net zero euros.


As a consequence of this round robin, none of them were in any different position: their account is still zero euros. A little less stressed because the credit was realised perhaps, but no better off.


We're confusing 'money' with trade - money is only a transaction facilitator. The real business is the exchange of goods and services. For one individual here, a good shag had an equivalent value to half a tonne of pork: but the hooker didn't need meat (or maybe she did if you know what I mean) so the barter wouldn't work.


The money concept meant that she could barter that shag 'value' for things she did want - such as a hotel room.


So in effect, this tale reminds us how bloody important money is.


Instability in the modern world is introduced because money is used to generate money -an intangible asset that has an imaginary value.


The original barter is lost in the fog of the banking world - but in execution 10 minutes of your time in the office is worth a 'fraction' of all the people involved in the process of baking a loaf. Hence you buy it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-212639
Share on other sites

Routine needs a bit of work before you take it to Edinburgh, Hugey, but I think the bare bones are there. Maybe add some amusing visual aids. Perhaps even build in a bit of "improv" - get people to shout out suggestions for items to barter.


It'll need a bit of word of mouth but you should do well. Try an Aussie or Irish accent as well - if you want to cover all the bases.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-212912
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Two young boys walked into a pharmacy one day, picked out a box of tampons and proceeded to the checkout counter.

The man at the counter asked the older boy, "Son, how old are you?"

"Eight," the boy replied.

The man continued, "do you know what these are used for?"

The boy replied, "not exactly, but they aren't for me. They're for him. He's my brother. He's four. We saw on TV that if you use these you would be able to swim and ride a bike. Right now, he can't do either

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/295-a-joke/page/41/#findComment-224821
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why on earth is there so much interest, and negativity, after a 100 days of a Labour government when we had 1000s of days of dreadful government before this with hardly a chat on this Website?  What is it that is suddenly so much greater interest? Here's part of a list of what they have done in a 100 days - it's from a Labour MP so obviously there is some bias, and mainly new Bills so yet to deliver/put into law.  This reminds me of the US election where the popular view was that Biden had achieved nothing, rather than leading the recovery after Covid, a fairer tax system, housing, supporting workers, dealing with community unrest following high profile racist incidents,  So if we think Starmer is ineffective and Labour incompetent then we are all going to believe it? I do feel sick after seeing Clarkson on Newsnight, playing to the gallery.  Surely Trump must have a high profile role for him on the environment and climate change  
    • Hi looking for a shed for my allotment. Can pick up
    • But do you not understand how tough farming is, especially post-Brexit when some of the subsidies were lost and costs have increased massively yet the prices farmers can charge has not? On the BBC News tonight they said pig farming costs had gone up 54% since 2019, cow farming costs up 44% and cereal costs up 43%. The NFU said that the margins are on average 0.5% return on capital. Land and buildings are assets that don't make money until you sell them...it's what you do with them that makes money and farms are struggling to make money and so many farms are generational family businesses so never realise the assets (one farmers on the news said his farm had been in the family since 1822) but will have to to pay tax for continuing the family business. On another news item tonight there was a short piece saying the government has said that 50,000 more pensioners will be forced into relative poverty (60% of the average income) due to the Winter Fuel Allowance removal which will rise to 100,000 more by 2027. James Murray from the Treasury was rolled out on Newsnight to try and defend that and couldn't. You can't give doctors 20%+ and push more pensioners into poverty as a result.  The problem for Labour is the court of public opinion will judge them and right now the jury is out after a series of own-goals, really poor communication and ill-thought-out idealogical policies. And don't ever annoy the farmers.....;-)  
    • That % of “affected” doesn’t mean they are all in deep trouble.  It means this will touch on them in some small way mostly - apart from the biggest farms  it’s like high rate tax earners taking to the street when Osborne dragged child/benefit claimants into self assessment.  A mild pain  the more I read, the more obviously confected it is. Still - just as with farage and his banking “woes”, a social media campaign is no barrier to the gullible  what percentage of farms affected by Brexit and to what degree compared go IHT?  Or does that not matter? Thats different money is it? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...