Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This isn?t a new thing and it isn?t specific to vaccines. Young people can access health care without their parents knowledge and against their wishes providing they are deemed competent to make that https://learning.nspcc.org.uk/child-protection-system/gillick-competence-fraser-guidelines
I don?t know how children of 12 can be deemed competent to know if a brand new vaccine is worth them taking with the side effects weighed up against the benefits with regards to a new disease. Plenty of adults are unsure about it! I certainly don?t think that school staff should be the ones to assess that competency.
  • 2 weeks later...

I think it is morally bankrupt and sets a dangerous precedent. It should be up to parents what is injected into their children, particularly when it comes to experimental therapies that have no long term data, and whose risk profile is greater than that of the disease they purport to protect against.

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/13/covid-19-vaccines-for-children-hypothetical-benefits-to-adults-do-not-outweigh-risks-to-children/

tarafitness Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it is morally bankrupt and sets a

> dangerous precedent. It should be up to parents

> what is injected into their children, particularly

> when it comes to experimental therapies that have

> no long term data, and whose risk profile is

> greater than that of the disease they purport to

> protect against.

> https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/13/covid-19-vacc



100% agreed!

> ines-for-children-hypothetical-benefits-to-adults-

> do-not-outweigh-risks-to-children/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Looks like moths have been at it!
    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...