Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22459815


  Quote
A prominent barrister specialising in reproductive rights has called for the age of consent to be lowered to 13.


Barbara Hewson told online magazine Spiked that the move was necessary in the wake of the Jimmy Savile scandal to end the "persecution of old men".


She also said that complainants should no longer receive anonymity.


The NSPCC called her views "outdated and simply ill-informed" and said to hear them "from a highly experienced barrister simply beggars belief".

Shocking enough, but for a woman to call for that? Would she like her own 13 year old daughter to be dating a 50 year old man I wonder? All very well to be wrrying about the prosecution of old men (I'm sure she meant to say prosecution, not persecution) but perhaps if her own legal profession (and the Police) had been more interested in treating rape victims better than they did at the time, victims may not have felt too scared to come forward until now.


Truly astounding how some barristers (and judges) think.....

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shocking enough, but for a woman to call for that?



Not sure why she'd be held to a higher standard than a reasonable man.



> Would she like her own 13 year old daughter to be

> dating a 50 year old man I wonder? All very well

> to be wrrying about the prosecution of old men

> (I'm sure she meant to say prosecution, not

> persecution)


In the context, she did mean persecution - she goes on to refer to the 'Savile Inquisition'.

In any event, what concerns me is the perceived trivialisation of "Taking girls to one?s dressing room, bottom pinching and groping in cars . . ." and "Touching a 17-year-old?s breast, kissing a 13-year-old, or putting one?s hand up a 16-year-old?s skirt."

I agree entirely. To dismiss sexual assault (because that's what it is) as trivial is wrong. But with Saville, we aren't talking about groping....we are talking about much worse. The guy was a despicable peadophile, end of. Why anyone would have an issue with the exposure of that (let alone a barrister) is a mystery to me.
  • 2 weeks later...

The issue of children's exposure to pornography via the internet is being debated (again) on Radio 4 right now.


A contributor who is 1) pro opt-in and 2) against the inclusion of the topic of pornography in compulsory sex education classes keeps saying how terrible it would be if parents were criminally prosecuted for refusing to allow their 5 and 6 year olds to study extreme images of sex in class.


Talk about a straw man argument. As if that is what anyone is suggesting.

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22842192


  Quote
Seven men are currently awaiting sentencing after being convicted last month of involvement in a major sex trafficking ring in Oxford.


But, after the legal process ends, what support is there for victims as they fight to get their lives back?


...Psychiatrists who have studied girls who've been sexually abused as children found that more than two-thirds had depression and severe post-traumatic stress disorder - suffering flashbacks, intrusive thoughts and the fear the abuse will happen again.


Some victims are offered counselling by charities. But few will get access to specialist psychotherapy.


File on 4 has been told that victims face a postcode lottery when it comes to receiving help from the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.


In some areas services last to 18, but in other parts of the country 16- and 17-year-olds are not getting the support they need, with provision cutting off just before 16 in some places.


Thresholds for adult care are higher, and you cannot be referred until you are 18, so many 16- and 17-year-olds are falling through the gap.


...There are now more than 160 statutory and voluntary organisations offering counselling and mentoring - and finding young people housing, and education.


But the deputy children's commissioner for England says the availability of help is still hit-and-miss depending on where people live. Sue Berelowitz will be publishing a report in the winter containing recommendations on what should be available for exploited children.


She says councils are getting better at identifying grooming, but they need to do more to help young people recover.


"We will have a better idea towards the end of the year what the scale of support is but I would be very surprised if it is sufficient.


"What's being done to sexually exploited children is of an utterly savage and appalling nature. It's completely unreasonable to expect young people to survive such experiences psychologically intact.


"There's no point everybody getting on their high horse and very agitated about the horrors of child sexual exploitation if we don't put in support to make sure those who are victims are assisted to come through their experiences as best we can," she said.


DJKQ's omment could be read as one of perspective rather than morality, but I digress from the issue at hand. If we're really to prevent child sexual exploitation, I think we also have to create a culture and an infrastructure that helps and supports victims more. People don't come forward to report crimes and ask for help, if they don't expect to receive any help. Coming forward report crimes early could potentially be an avenue for preventing further crimes from happening. But if people feel like reporting these crimes leads to no real help and incurs in itself a deeper sense of victimisation, then it's easy to see why reporting such crimes is so difficult.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
    • Another recommendation for Silvano. I echo everything the above post states. I passed first time this week with 3 minors despite not starting to learn until my mid-30s. Given the costs for lessons I have heard, he's also excellent value.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...