Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It?s about time isn?t it?


London is effectively a country within a country and it?s about time it has its own flag.


We could get Grayson Perry to design it, but what should it look like?


It should be representative of all of us here in the great morass of London, those born here and immigrants alike. ( (I?m a London immigrant, having migrated up from Sussex)


I?d be proud to fly our flag!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/293532-the-london-flag/
Share on other sites

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It?s about time isn?t it?

>

> London is effectively a country within a country

> and it?s about time it has its own flag.

>

> We could get Grayson Perry to design it, but what

> should it look like?

>

> It should be representative of all of us here in

> the great morass of London, those born here and

> immigrants alike. ( (I?m a London immigrant,

> having migrated up from Sussex)

>

> I?d be proud to fly our flag!


Do you work for the Tory press office?


:)

😄 cheeky monkey


No but seriously, I?ve tried to make this as apolitical as possible, but as you?ll see the alt-right Boris fan boy Brexiteer has posted after you, trying to drag Sadiq Khan into the narrative.


That in itself is a slippery slope, given 59.9% of real Londoners voted to stay in the Brexit vote. Dogger and his ilk could along with others like him, could end up in the minority, and maybe even asked to leave/be repatriated with those likeminded patriots, outside of the new walls of London.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 😄 cheeky monkey

>

> 59.9% of

> real Londoners voted to stay in the Brexit vote.

> Dogger and his ilk could along with others like

> him, could end up in the minority, and maybe even

> asked to leave/be repatriated with those

> likeminded patriots, outside of the new walls of

> London.


That's a remarkably quick progression from flagwaving to dismissing people as "not real" Londoners to deportation.

There was a time when such loveable luvvies as Perry and Izzard with their OTT transvestism were seen as artistically ironic, etc. but maybe not now? Be interesting to see whether Grayson frocks up less in public. (And it is still no to a flag, made by whichever person.)

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do London residents still enjoy 24 times as much

> infrastructure spending as residents in N.E.

> England? Perhaps we could have a flag to celebrate

> that - one that's nice of course. A rainbow made

> out of leeches or something.



This is a good point and you should raise it with Johnson regarding his ?promise? to level up, because you won?t find *anybody* who objects to the regions being given the help they need.


At the same time, remind me how much of the job market and tax base London and the SE provides? Hmmm? Also have you looked around and seen just how much the infrastructure *actually costs* in London? Do you like all the roads and hospitals and schools? Do you think the money for them just magically appears?


Exactly why is it London residents fault that successive governments have ignored the regions? Why am I a leech because both Tory and Labour took the north and midlands for granted? Moreover, if I?m sucking the life out of the NE then so are you. Except neither of us are.


Absolutely nobody is saying that there isn?t a chronic imbalance in this country. I challenge you to find just one person who thinks we shouldn?t invest heavily in deprived regions. I also challenge you to find evidence that this govt will actually do it.


So we?ve gone from flags to transvestism and thrown in a bit of Sadiq and London-bashing. Peak EDF.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do London residents still enjoy 24 times as much

> infrastructure spending as residents in N.E.

> England? Perhaps we could have a flag to celebrate

> that - one that's nice of course. A rainbow made

> out of leeches or something.



This is a good point and you should raise it with Johnson regarding his ?promise? to level up, because you won?t find *anybody* who objects to the regions being given the help they need.


At the same time, remind me how much of the job market and tax base London and the SE provides? Hmmm? Also have you looked around and seen just how much the infrastructure *actually costs* in London? Do you like all the roads and hospitals and schools? Do you think the money for them just magically appears?


Exactly why is it London residents fault that successive governments have ignored the regions? Why am I a leech because both Tory and Labour took the north and midlands for granted? Moreover, if I?m sucking the life out of the NE the. So are you. Except neither of us are.


Absolutely nobody is saying that there isn?t a chronic imbalance in this country. I challenge you to find just one person who thinks we shouldn?t invest heavily in deprived regions. I also challenge you to find evidence that this govt will actually do it.


So we?ve gone from flags to transvestism and thrown in a bit of Sadiq and London-bashing. Peak EDF.

SpringTime Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do London residents still enjoy 24 times as much

> infrastructure spending as residents in N.E.

> England? Perhaps we could have a flag to celebrate

> that - one that's nice of course. A rainbow made

> out of leeches or something.


Leeches? London paid ?32 billion more in tax than it "got back". The North East paid ?10.7 billion less in tax than it got back.


How much do you think it would cost to build a new bus station in Peckham compared to a new one in Scunthorpe?

I'm up for London declaring independence, so guess we ought to have a flag. Should probably be red (the colour of buses, old school phone boxes and letter boxes etc... seems like a good London colour. Perhaps with a picture of a pint on it. Keep things simple.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its a red cross with a sword ?



That?s the City of London. The GLC flag was a gold crown on a red field above blue and white waves. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_London_Council#/media/File%3AFlag_of_Greater_London.svg

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a time when such loveable luvvies as

> Perry and Izzard with their OTT transvestism were

> seen as artistically ironic, etc. but maybe not

> now? Be interesting to see whether Grayson frocks

> up less in public. (And it is still no to a flag,

> made by whichever person.)


Catch Kitson is less busy these days


She?s unfashionably pretty straight, maybe she?s your person to design the flag

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hopefully the Outer boroughs would stay in the

> Union - England and whoever is left.

>

> Whoops, strayed into controversial territory.


Maybe that?s what it?s called


The London Union or London United


On the flag the strap line reads


?Sling yer hook?

alex_b Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Its a red cross with a sword ?

>

>

> That?s the City of London. The GLC flag was a gold

> crown on a red field above blue and white waves.

> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_London_Cou

> ncil#/media/File%3AFlag_of_Greater_London.svg



Signifying Ken Livingstone's reign over land sea and sky ?

Seabag - my point is that they are too "out there" but that they are "out there" in a socially unacceptable way now. The peopel who would have lauded them are now much more likely to decry their pantomimic "woman face" antics. Cath Kidston is not my scene, either and no, London, does not need a flag or motto or sticker or hashtag.

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag - my point is that they are too "out there"

> but that they are "out there" in a socially

> unacceptable way now. The peopel who would have

> lauded them are now much more likely to decry

> their pantomimic "woman face" antics. Cath Kidston

> is not my scene, either and no, London, does not

> need a flag or motto or sticker or hashtag.


What about an Instagram account? I think even the Queen has one?!


But let?s not get Grayson and his alter ego mixed up. Grayson is a social commentator of some standing , his Reith lectures and work as an artist prove that.


Clair his alter ego is his expression of himself in part, of course it contrives to shock and create discussion, but it shouldn?t render him or his work redundant, unlike Cath?s ironing board covers etc. And tell me, do you think this ?panto? he?s been engaged in has added to or diminished the cause of gender politics? I?d say it?s given a lot of people the courage to be themselves, and for the world around them to accept them easier, in general.


And in these days of identity, London needs to be acknowledged for what it is, and stand up for that, after all, it?s what the people of London voted for, so we can?t ignore the democratic process that got us there.


If and when there?s a United London referendum, we?ll be able to flex that strength even more. Let the rest of the voters live amongst their own with pride. I know Kent and Medway towns voted overwhelmingly for the situation we?re in, so let those other join them and leave our great UL to thrive. I?d go as far as to reintroduce the single market and align with our friends in the EU on people movement etc. We?d be up and running in not time, shops stocked to the rafters, lorries galore.


Onward, waving the flag.


LONDON WE LOVE YOU ❤️

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...