Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone know what's going on Melon Road around the entrance to Peckham Pulse - there are a load of hoardings in place which seems to have sprung up now that the testing centre has been removed from the PP car park. I tried to cycle through there to Sumner Road but it's now all blocked by the new hoardings.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/292368-melon-roadpeckham-pulse/
Share on other sites

If it is where I think it is..it is part of the process of Southwark building on a park and one of the last green spaces in the most polluted part of Peckham I believe. Another Southwark Council planning disaster. Plane trees cut down and many very upset residents.

Ahh - found it.

https://www.southwark.gov.uk/housing/new-council-homes/where-we-re-building/peckham/flaxyard-site




Seems like a real shame that the Council are building on green space. Isn't there also a huge new set of flats being built where the old timber yard (Whittens) was ?

Apparently poor people who live in garden-less flats in Peckham don?t deserve a park and it?s their fault if people are homeless because they selfishly want a green space to breathe in (the LBC interview with a Southwark councillor was shocking).

But it is ok for people in Dulwich Village with gardens bigger than Peckham Green to have a new ?square of shame? and Dulwich Park.

Southwark Council is so wrong-headed.

I think the 5000 are across South London if I remember correctly so Lambeth, Southwark, Bromley etc. this doesn?t include the council property that Southwark has sold off, which is also a significant amount, I will try and find the FOI when I?m less busy with work.

The council cannot ignore the Right to Buy. Tenants can buy property at a significant discount after three years residence with a public landlord. https://www.gov.uk/right-to-buy-buying-your-council-home


A homeless person in priority need ie with learning or physical difficulties or children MUST be housed by the council if they are homeless. The prime generator of homelessness is private tenancies coming to an end. The landlord does not need a reason to end it though there is a process.


Result: lots of people in expensive temporary accommodation while they wait for a public sector home (council or housing association).

The latest report, so not through a FOI and outlined in Southwark News in an excellent article by Katherine Johnstone

https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/the-great-infilling-debate-in-southwark-every-estate-where-new-developments-are-proposed-or-already-underway/


Last year the charity Action on Empty Homes compiled new statistics it described as ?extremely worrying? showing that the number of empty homes in Southwark had rocketed during lockdown, with one in 24 having ?no one living there?.

More than 3,600 homes in Southwark in 2020 were no longer listed as primary residences, up by almost 600 per cent from 523 in 2019 ? the highest recorded rise in any London borough.

There are also a further 2,358 homes listed as long-term empty properties in Southwark, up from 1,469 this time last year. While properties can be listed as temporarily empty in snapshot data during renovations, house sales or in between lets, any rise in the number that are empty long-term is particularly concerning.

So Alice is correct in saying 5000 empty homes, although possibly these are not all social housing

And it isn't the right to buy that is an issue, it is Southwark selling housing stock that is in 'nice' areas to private investors, then concentrating social housing in certain areas...and then taking away their green spaces. They could have transformed Heygate rather than sell off and cause many older residents with no choice but to move due to the stock being offered at 3-4 times the rent.

heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The latest report, so not through a FOI and

> outlined in Southwark News in an excellent article

> by Katherine Johnstone

> https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/the-great-inf

> illing-debate-in-southwark-every-estate-where-new-

> developments-are-proposed-or-already-underway/

>

> Last year the charity Action on Empty Homes

> compiled new statistics it described as ?extremely

> worrying? showing that the number of empty homes

> in Southwark had rocketed during lockdown, with

> one in 24 having ?no one living there?.

> More than 3,600 homes in Southwark in 2020 were no

> longer listed as primary residences, up by almost

> 600 per cent from 523 in 2019 ? the highest

> recorded rise in any London borough.

> There are also a further 2,358 homes listed as

> long-term empty properties in Southwark, up from

> 1,469 this time last year. While properties can be

> listed as temporarily empty in snapshot data

> during renovations, house sales or in between

> lets, any rise in the number that are empty

> long-term is particularly concerning.

> So Alice is correct in saying 5000 empty homes,

> although possibly these are not all social housing


There?s no indication that more than a small proportion are social housing. I expect a large number of the ?not primary residence? category are holiday or investment properties. Long term empty is probably for similar reasons especially with overseas owners unable to travel for the last 18-months.

Yes that is entirely true, although nearly 900 empty council houses as shown in the FOI and documented by Southwark Council themselves is nothing to be proud of. The number on the park does not equal 900 and this is an area with hardly any green space and one of the most polluted roads in London.

> First sort out the 5000 empty council properties.


Not true.


heartblock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes that is entirely true, although nearly 900

> empty council houses as shown in the FOI and

> documented by Southwark Council themselves is

> nothing to be proud of.

Most of those "empty" council properties are actually being redeveloped. It's just not true that the council is sitting around with huge parts of its estate empty for no good reason.

https://londonnewsonline.co.uk/southwark-council-plan-to-bring-almost-4000-empty-homes-back-into-use/


The right to buy is madness. Second homes should be more heavily taxed.

  • 2 weeks later...
To be fair this land was never really a park and has always been designated for development. I used to work on Sumner Road and never saw anyone using this land as a park. Local residents do have the canal path, Burgess Park at the end of the road, Lettsom gardens not far away etc.

In terms of the original comments - this is a really annoying development, coming on top of the reopening of Rye Lane to traffic. There doesn't really seem to be a good cycling route. The Spine doesn't have a safe crossing at the end of Lyndhurst, the top of Rye Lane is horrible as the lane mixes with pedestrians so this route down the side of Lidl used to be useful to get to the canal path as there were lights to cross Peckham Road. It would be great if the hoardings could be moved back to allow a route through for cyling.


Separately, whilst the headline figures on empty homes in Southwark aren't great, the large majority are not within Southwark's control. It would be good to see greater penalties on private investors who leave property unoccupied long term. For example, I'd like to see large multiples of council tax levied on properties that are empty and not actively being renovated for letting.

For example, I'd like to see large multiples of council tax levied on properties that are empty and not actively being renovated for letting.


Where houses have been inherited, possibly by a number of siblings, agreeing how and whether they are disposed can be a long-run event - this can leave them empty for some time, as can finalising an estate and then finding funds for e.g. renovation to lettable standards. Some properties clearly are simply being held empty, but for many closure following death can be a long-run (and quite traumatic) event. Forcing properties into the market against the will, desire or capabilities of those who own them sounds somewhat draconian. There will already be being estates duty on them (if appropriate, as it often is on locally over-values properties) as well as normal council taxes etc. - when the public costs associated with empty private property (no call on water, sewage, rubbish collection, education, health, road use etc.) will be minimal.

The number of houses you mention Penguin are miniscule in comparison to those held by overseas investors - especially in new developments. I'm particularly thinking of investors who want brand new properties that have never been lived in and who keep them that way. These aren't insignificant in number.


It could be possible to have an exemption for houses going through probate for a set amount of time, but there really does need to be some measure in place to deter holding property without having anyone living in it - we have a finite amount of land and allowing people to hold properties empty is unacceptable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...