Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ginger Jenny definitely should have gone, or at least weepy old lucinda and her attitude problem.


you know I'd love to see them have to do something like run a classroom, or an old people's home, or an ER on a saturday night.

or better still, the toilet cleaning operation at a festival.


IE something of real value rather than just show how good they are at selling each other down the river and talking motivational bollokcs

Jenny, what a complete B**@*, mind you the look on Shazia's face when it dawned on her what was actually happening in the boardroom and to her was priceless, really wanted her to stand up to Jenny and shout her down though and she just didn't and let her get away with it! Lucinda just disintegrated into a weepy bundle and didn't have a voice either. I suppose thats what the programme is all about, ruthless people chopping down the weaklings on their way to the top! Though the 24 hour laundry helpline was a classic!

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I quite liked the red head girl in the shirt & tie, but she'll probably turn out to be as annoying as the rest.




Well she proved me right there, what a complete and utter fecking tw@t she is!!!


Sorry I watched this late having recorded it. That really was unfair, what happened to Shazia, she was truly stitched up, but should have stood up for herself more! She probably should have explained her sorting system, but did it not occur to a single one of them to give her a call and ask FFS?!?!?


Lucinda was a bit wet, and should have told Ginger to f**k off. That Jenny really is like Bianca from EastEnders when she was much younger. She's all mouth, and it really annoys me how hard she's trying to be a bit well spoken! The other girls didn't seem happy with her bullying tactics, but kept quiet to protect themselves, which I guess is fair enough. However, I don't think she'll always get away with acting like that, so hopefully Lucinda shall have her revenge!


As for the boys, pretty impressive last week, and interesting that they had pretty much put their differences behind them and gotten on with it... Can't see the girls being so wiling to forget...

Yeah I like Simon, and think he could do well. That Ian had to go, and I think Sir Alan chose those 2 team leaders because they'd been anonymous so far and it was likely the losing team leader would go. That Kevin the gerbil has got serious little man syndrome, can't see him getting far! The girls need to sort it out, far too much bitching! Think they'll be better off when the teams are mixed, which I think starts next week...
Dont you think Kevin looks like Matt Lucas from Little Britain!! What a knobhead he is. I thought he was going to cry at one stage. Yes the girls are all nails and teeth at the moment and deffo need a bit of testosterone to calm them down abit.

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dont you think Kevin looks like Matt Lucas from Little Britain!!



Ha, that is exactly what Mrs Keef said last night!


Of the lads, I like Simon and Raef, and absolutely hate that c**t Alex!


Of the girls, I liked the one who was sat on the stairs by the kitchen saying that they needed to sort it out and work as a team instead of looking for scapegoats. Lucinda is good value because she's obviously insane! Ginger Jenny is a total nightmare of a human being, can't believe I thought she'd be nice.

I was wondering how the format might work with .. ahem .. more mature managers. Given the encroaching recession there may be a few redundees out there by next year and seeing what they make of the tasks would make an interesting contrast with the laddish / Big Brother style culture of the current series.


On the whole I preferred Series 1 & 2 when there was less posturing.

TillieTrotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dont you think Kevin looks like Matt Lucas from

> Little Britain!! What a knobhead he is. I

> thought he was going to cry at one stage. Yes the

> girls are all nails and teeth at the moment and

> deffo need a bit of testosterone to calm them down

> abit.



my thoughts exactly,and do you know who he most resembles, "margaret,margaret"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...