Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Lucinda Vs Raef would be my ideal final... However, from the footage they've shown of next week, Lucinda seems to be having a row with someone, hope she doesn't slip now... They're making an ad for tissues next week, and the clips also suggested that Alex might get a bit carried away with the "art of film"... That said, they are good at not giving much away with these teasers.


Couldn't say much to defend Sara last night, other than to say Micheal is worse, and should have gone... How did he manage to talk himself in to next week at the end, is Alan going soft?!?!? Nick looked shocked that he'd let Micheal off.


Despite wanting Lucinder & Raef, my money is on Clare Vs Lee.

it was pretty cringe worthy -"please let me stay Sir Alan, please". if it had been me, i would've booted Micheal off too - just for that performance. but then i guess two leaving in one show can't continue, or the series wouldn't last as long!


totally agree on Raef's comment -i was laughing out loud at that one too!

Michael is the worst kind of snobby, sulky, supercilious over-indulged public school prat. Had he been born to a poor family he'd be stacking shelves somewhere. However his privilege has given him the false impression that he deserves to succeed.


I agree with Margaret's appraisal when she was told he read Classics at Edinburgh. "Edinburgh isn't what it used to be." Spot on.

I hoped Lucinder would have a chance, but can't see her doing it now. Lee and Alex dumped her, but she just whinged about it, and tried to show how mean they'd been, rather than just getting on with it. I think had she just gotten on with the job, Alan Sugar would have been impressed, as he knew she'd been dumped by the lads.


Lee is basically a bit thick, Alex has been a horrid bully since episode 1, and still is. Helene has no chance at all, so I'd have to agree that Claire is strong favourite...


Have to agree that Micheal actually came across as quite a nice bloke on the "You're Fired" show. He was basically playing the game, and very nearly slipped through.

Yeah i think you're right Jimbo1964 Claire used to annoy me a lot but think she has taken the criticism on board well and has made some changes. liked when she said that she is trying to regulate her talking and AS saying she had a moouth the size of blackwall tunnel


shame about lucinda whinging so much yes -she would have got more credit had she just got on with it. although having said that i think she's a better manager than a do-er, and definitely a better manager than lee and alex.

Well that was rubbish, wasn't it? I wanted to see Helene and Alex get minced, re-shaped into patties, grilled till charred and then thrown to the pigs. Disappointed.


And SRalan and his cronies are a bunch of sexist old gits - Lucinda would be good at interior design and decorating the board room, chuckle chuckle. How does she gross 100k pa contracting, then? That's a lot of candles to sell.


And SirAlan's "Nice to have a lady's view" to Karen Brady - shown his true colours there the patronising twunt. I hope he either picks fame-hungry passive aggressive nutjob Claire, or defensive, holllow streak of piss Alex, or even manipulative eye-roller Helen - he deserves all of them to be honest.


(stop me if I'm taking this too seriously, someone)

I thought her interviews seemed a bit... weak, I suppose. Although maybe that's just in comparison to the other ones.


Also, did anyone else spot the slight spoiler in the clips from the final with Sirallun giving his reasons for firing the last three rejects? Looked to me like they'd inadvertently revealed the gender of the winner, and from that it's not too big a leap to predict who'd get it. (Can't remember now but they may have only been shown on the end of the You're Fired show on BBC2.)

It had its moments, but was a bit of a let-down compared to previous 'CV' episodes.

As ever, the need to continually up the television ante every series has turned it into too much of a circus.


The bald interviewee was completely wank this time. "I'M TOUGH! LOOK AT MY SHINY HOT HEAD! I MEAN BUSINESS!". These are supposed to be real people, ask them to act and it's just rubbish.


Who would I employ? Hmm..


Well Helene's eyes are too far apart, and sometimes seem to move independently - like a tree frog.

Claire just needs a cork in the mouth and a bowl of wee tipping on her head. If I see her do that eyes-looky-up-to-the-left/nose-wrinkle combo thing again I may have to do something drastic like, say, leaving the room and put the kettle on.

Alex is out on the grounds that he has a mouth like a cat's arsehole and cruel, pink, thin 'Joker Lips'.


So that leaves Lee. Who I quite like, for some reason.

Ha Ha.. how many wrappers do you have to save to get one of those?


I think you're right about SRalan though.

Chipping away at the edges of his likeable grizzly no-nonsense merit-based boy-dunn-good persona is a bit of a tetchy old-skool (ie sexist) knob. Still a likeable knob though. At the moment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...