Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It depends on the specifics (which of course we don't know). I have friends with bi-polar and they hold down jobs. There are many famous people with bi-polar disorder in various professions. I think its important not to inadvertently stigmatise all people dealing with bi-polar disorder as unemployable (or osteoporosis for that matter).


Whether the OP can work or not is not something any of us can determine. We do know ATOS have been far too aggressive in their assessments, have been over-turned on appeal, and have financial incentives to incorrectly assess people. That is a disgrace and if the OP really is not fit for work, then hopefully the organisations doing very good work that have already been mentioned can help him or her.


With that said, to the extent that its possible, I hope the OP can stay in her local area but the shortage of social housing is acute and overcrowding is a real concern. Unless it would really cause undue mental strain (more than it causes anyone to move!) her home should be made available to family that needs both rooms in my opinion and she should be put in a one bedroom property.


With that said, I hope the OP gets whatever help he or she needs.




Champ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why would a bipolar disorder or osteoporosis

> prevent someone from working? Undeniably there

> will be some occupations that won't be suitable

> but not all.

Osteoporosis is often not painful (it relates to bone density) and many women have some form of the disease, particularly post menopause. Again, the OP might be in pain, but osteoporosis is not something that makes you unable to work automatically (though obviously the increased risk of fracture means certain types of jobs aren't suitable).


Whether someone can function with bi-polar depends on a whole host of factors. One of my best friends is bi-polar and works as an architect for one of the leading international practices. Its a complex disease.


david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Champ Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Why would a bipolar disorder or osteoporosis

> > prevent someone from working? Undeniably there

> > will be some occupations that won't be suitable

> > but not all.

>

> Can you think of a job suitable for someone

> suffering from severe depression and mania on a

> regular basis and high levels of physical pain

> upon movement? I'm struggling but I'm sure you can

> enlighten us.....

I agree LM but part of the problem that many with mental health problems have is in finding employment in the first place. Employers just don't want people who nmay be ill more often than others. Whereas those who are already employed at the time of the onset of illness tend to find more sympathy in their place of work and theredfore often cope better.


A lot of work needs to be done to combat the ignorance of and stigma around mental health issues before forcing thousands of people (who may not be ready) into the labour market.


We all know that welfare reform is driven by money only. There has been little consideration of the deatil of the impact on some individuals. And let's not forget that tax credits anbd help for those in work is also keeping people in homes they could not afford without it. Housing is too expensive accross the board (proportionate to income) and until someone in power has the balls to do something about that then people are going to continue to be screwed.

Yes, it doesn't take much for employers to discriminate-- any woman in her 30s who employers think might get pregnant knows that well enough, much less someone suffering from a serious mental illness. Discrimination is really at the heart of the problem as is affordable housing in London-- neither of which have easy solutions.

Yes, but reinforcing the idea that those suffering mental illness "can't" work only strengthens the prejudice employers and society has against them-- which those who can and want to work find particularly galling and why there is still so much shame and secrecy surrounding these issues.


A better way forward is needed.

ATOS prevented my husband who is also bipolar from getting ESA as when applied he was very depressed having been off work for 6 months and being medically retired due to frequent periods of depression lasting 26 weeks in one year (several periods of depression). When seen by ATOS was 'high'. Dr.kept asking him why I drove him to the assessment centre - hubby has never learnt to drive. Seemed to not undertand that hubby's poor attention and concentration span, and inability to consider what was going on around him would prevent him from driving and if he drove would be up on a manslaughter charge. ATOS Dr kept asking me if I had ever seen him attempt to drive!!.

Could not get ESA or JSA as occupational pension was ?2 pw over limit allowed to earn. Signed on each fortnight and was pressurised to apply for jobs mainly in IT - hubby can only just know how to send an email as has never had cause in previous work to use IT. Hubby asked to go on a training course but they refused.


It is hard to work with bipolar but hubby worked from 20 - 58 and had over 40 jobs - working in a factory to accounts clerk, to post room attendant, to shop worker, to home help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Does anyone know when the next SNT meeting is? I am fed up with my son being mugged on East Dulwich Grove! 
    • The issue must be everywhere at the moment. I was visiting a friend last week in Bermondsey, think we were walking  down Linton Rd & we dodged 7 dog poos. It was disgusting. 
    • Thanks for your message — I actually took the time to look into what CityHive does before posting my original comment, and I’d encourage anyone with questions to do the same. Yes, the Companies House filings are overdue — but from what I’ve gathered, this seems likely to be an accountant or admin issue, not some sign of ill intent. A lot of small, community-based organisations face challenges keeping up with formalities, especially when they’re focused on immediate needs like food distribution. Let’s not forget CityHive is a not-for-profit, volunteer-powered CIC — not a corporate machine. As for the directors, people stepping down or being replaced is often about capacity or commitment — which is completely normal in the voluntary and community sector. New directors are sometimes appointed when others can no longer give the time. It doesn’t automatically mean bad governance — it just means people’s circumstances change. CityHive’s actual work speaks volumes. They buy most of the food they distribute — fresh produce, essential groceries, and shelf-stable items — and then deliver it to food banks, soup kitchens, and community projects across London. The food doesn’t stay with CityHive — it goes out to local food hubs, and from there, directly to people who need it most. And while yes, there may be a few paid staff handling logistics or admin, there’s a huge volunteer effort behind the scenes that often goes unseen. Regular people giving their time to drive vans, sort donations, load pallets, pack food parcels — that’s what keeps things running. And when people don’t volunteer? Those same tasks still need to be done — which means they have to be paid for. Otherwise, the whole thing grinds to a halt. As the need grows, organisations like CityHive will inevitably need more support — both in people and funding. But the bigger issue here isn’t one small CIC trying to make ends meet. The real issue is the society we live in — and a government that isn’t playing its part in eradicating poverty. If it were, organisations like CityHive, The Felix Project, City Harvest, FareShare, and the Trussell Trust wouldn’t need to exist, let alone be thriving. They thrive because the need is growing. That’s not a reflection on them — it’s a reflection on a broken system that allows people to go hungry in one of the richest cities in the world. If you're in doubt about what they’re doing, go check their Instagram: @cityhivemedia. You’ll see the real organisations and people receiving food, sharing thanks, and showing how far the impact reaches. Even Southwark Foodbank has received food from CityHive — that alone should speak volumes. So again — how does any of this harm you personally? Why spend time trying to discredit a group trying to support those who are falling through the cracks? We need more people lifting others up — not adding weight to those already carrying the load.
    • Well, this is very disappointing. Malabar Feast  has changed its menu again. The delicious fish curry with sea bass no longer exists. There is now a fish dish with raw mango, which doesn't appeal. I had dal and spinach instead, which was bland (which I suppose I could/should have predicted). One of my visitors had a "vegetable Biriani" which contained hardly any vegetables. Along with it came two extremely tiny pieces of poppadom in a large paper bag.   This was embarrassing, as I had been singing Malabar's praises and recommending we ordered from there. The other mains and the parathas were OK, but I doubt we will be ordering from there again. My granddaughters wisely opted for Yard Sale pizzas, which were fine. Has anybody else had a similar recent poor (or indeed good!)  experience at Malabar Feast?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...