Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I looked for a Valentine's Day Thread to ask whether people still did this (well, if they still did it after their 20s maybe) but all that turned up was people selling stuff - which kinda sums up the day.


So, is it really just Hallmark Day? or do you still shower your significant other in gifts and special treats?


Cards, chocs, fizz, night-out, impromptu break in Paris?


And if you do, do you do so because of your deep love for said other and a wish to demonstrate this love?


...or because if you don't do it you will get so much stick that forgetting your anniversary will pale in comparison?


Or is it a perfunctory supermarket card, milk tray and prosecco with the prawn cocktail (none of which I'm knocking) just for the sake of tradition?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/29102-curmudgeons-corner/
Share on other sites

Me and my other half do other things together, without the boys around.


But on VD we sometimes go for a FULL-ON-CHEESE-FEST-VALENTINES-DAY


Tomorrow being one of these events, I intend to OD on the stuff


Padded card, helium ballon, lairy flowers, interlocking arms, sipping cheap champers et al.



Stand back - giant padded "I LOVE YOU" bear coming through.

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's nothing glorifying about wearing a poppy.

> It's a simple mark of respect.

>

> FFS.


I know, but people have odd ideas about Valentine's Day. It might be a flower, and it might be the right colour, but if it's not a bunch of roses, it doesn't count, however noble the motive.


It's right, of course, to remember the dead, but the dead aren't half as touchy as the living. Nor can they change the locks.

If it's the only day of the year you tell the special person in your life - then there's issues.


If it's done out of knee jerk reaction to some "special day" then boring ol' you


But if you have your own take, with bit of fun & some heavy irony, then power more to you


However, as Xmas is on the 25th so Valentines is on the 14th, no amount of lip service or inverted cool snobbery will change that.


Ignore it and something inside slowly withers.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> anyway, what's wrong with a kind of compulsory*

> beasting?

>

> *meaning in a mutual "I suppose we should" rather

> than any forcing sense



Yeah, a mutual "I suppose we should, shouldn't we? Eh? We should. Don't you think? Eh? I mean, you know, for the day like? Eh? For tradition's sake? Eh? Just sayin', we probaby should. Shouldn't we? Eh? Eh? Eh? Oy! Have you gone to fucking sleep?!"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our latest guest says that politicisation of universities is unhealthy, and the equation "Empire = Evil" is not historically tenable. He was used to speaking openly. Then in 2017 a Cambridge academic posted on social media in response to Biggar's proposed project looking at the Good and the Bad in Empire: "OMG this is serious shit. We Must CLOSE THIS DOWN." In his words, he saw there was a problem. Problems remain with embedded intolerance but this new member of the House of Lords still aspires to determine the truth of things. Meet Lord Biggar of Castle Douglas CBE, Regius Professor Emeritus of Moral & Pastoral Theology at Oxford University, on his visit to Peckham to talk with Chris Haydon and a small invited audience.  
    • What has any of this got to do with Gala?
    • I suspect Lambeth's legal team have decided that it is far better to potentially upset a High Court judge (maybe beg for forgiveness) than face the wrath of the legal teams of event organisers, promoters, service providers who would come after them for a lot of money if the event had to be cancelled. Clearly the original error was on the part of the council so I suspect that would make them liable for any losses/reputation damage incurred due cancellation/disruption.
    • I suspect it was putting "not bankrupting Lambeth Council" considerations first. Cancelling those festivals at a week to go could have been financially catastrophic and may have unleashed financial hell on Lambeth.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...