Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That'll be one of those pesky kids with their chalk again......;-)


Nice clear shots though....I wonder if anyone knows him....... I presume he was going down the road doing this to all the houses and then leaving the signs on the cars outside the house?


It's beyond pathetic - just as damaging the planters is. The idiots on both sides really need to grow up.

The interesting thing is that this guy wasnt obviously drunk and he did look up at the cameras several times!


Someone surely can recognise him. If so please send a PM and we will let the police know. Result was dents and scratches in the roof and bonnet. The signage is neither here or there but we just cannot have people like this damaging cars. There's enough vandalism to cars already without this type of behaviour.


Please assist.

Nice presumption again Rockets.


I think that the answer was 'no' that's not what happened. This is old footage and seems to be the only place its happened despite there being other signs on that stretch of road.


Odd behavior yes, part of a wider pattern and happening to all houses displaying signs - no.


The only other place I'd heard of was on Croxted after one of the England matches, but given people had been in the pub watching the football its hard to work out if its normal levels of post football euphoria vandalism or something more targeted.



Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That'll be one of those pesky kids with their

> chalk again......;-)

>

> Nice clear shots though....I wonder if anyone

> knows him....... I presume he was going down the

> road doing this to all the houses and then leaving

> the signs on the cars outside the house?

>

> It's beyond pathetic - just as damaging the

> planters is. The idiots on both sides really need

> to grow up.

Northern - a number of people reported the same thing happening to their signs across the Dulwich area - so this one, that was captured on camera, was not an isolated incident. It's not beyond the realm of possibility to suggest that it is this person who has been targeting other houses because this is clearly not a random act of vandalism - this is very much targeted - look at the effort he goes to to remove the sign. I am sure you'll agree that if he has caused damaged to any properties or cars he should be held to account for that - he is pretty recognisable.


He is clearly an idiot as so many people have cameras and Ring doorbells nowadays he was always going to be caught on one of them. As I have said before the idiots on both sides need to stop doing this type of thing and, if caught, should be held to account as it does neither side any good and is just childish in the extreme.

Yes - its easy to say that this is totally unacceptable - it is.


However,



"I presume he was going down the road doing this to all the houses and then leaving the signs on the cars outside the house?"


Well no - there were loads of signs on that road and seemingly only this one removed and put (again weirdly) on their car. Its not a house with a drive and the parking outside is full. Though it was the only SUV so maybe it was an unlucky coincidence for them).

funnylookingowl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Those signs down East Dulwich do look a bit tatty

> to me. And pointless, the government/TFL etc etc

> are not going to care about some signs on houses

> of millionaires who are upset that traffic is

> driving past their houses, on a road which that

> was designed exactly for.


Millionaires?? You must be joking.


The great majority of houses on EDG are sub-divided into flats and you won't find many millionaires there.


Not sure what you mean by tatty. There are 2 or 3 which have been interfered with and may not be vertical but they still get the message across. They must be effective if plonkers like this want to remove them.

Not too many, thankfully and what damage they have done has been rectified.


What is more concerning are the "useful idiots" who get manipulated by our elected office holders.






Some community spirited person must know him



Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Have the idiots been out again, targeting the

> anti-LTN signs?

>

> https://twitter.com/MaggieBMedia/status/1421375069

> 432029185?s=19

Rocks, you are not paying attention. Using terms such as idiots does not help your cause and you lose the moral high ground. I did give you and others some pretty good advice on the LTN thread, do pay attention.


[that is not saying whatever is going on is right, just if you are arguing any point it doesn't help to start throwing names around]

Malumbu - I think everyone can agree that if people are pulling down signs they don't agree with or vandalising planters they don't agree with then we can safely categorise them as idiots. They are the very definition of them. Or maybe pathetic deluded idiots if they think it is going to have any impact on the long term outcome or somehow make people change their views on the LTNs either way.

Spot on Rockets! It just makes the anti-LTNers more motivated and more determined.


Rockets Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Malumbu - I think everyone can agree that if

> people are pulling down signs they don't agree

> with or vandalising planters they don't agree with

> then we can safely categorise them as idiots. They

> are the very definition of them. Or maybe pathetic

> deluded idiots if they think it is going to have

> any impact on the long term outcome or somehow

> make people change their views on the LTNs either

> way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s been closed for several months, I think.
    • I've not posted any restaurant reviews here for a while, but with the long Easter weekend approaching I thought I'd serve an update. I recently reviewed The Palmerston and elsewhere became involved in a debate about the best pub lunch in SE22. So which ones do people here currently rate?  Yes I know people can just do a search for "Best pub lunch" but as well as new eateries popping up all the time two of the places I've reviewed – EDT and Bishop – have had a reboot since I reviewed them so I'm interested in hearing how they are doing now. FYI I'm still not charging people to read my reviews or subscribe (though they can pay if they are inclined) and I still haven't had any cease and desist letters from other food people who have used the word "Eats" in their name. And I put a lot of work into these reviews. They aren't just a couple of dashed off sentences saying what is good/bad. When not doing this for fun I'm a professional journalist. If people want to nitpick and be pedantic I'll just have to learn to live with it. https://eatsdulwich.substack.com/ 
    • Have there been any happy outcomes yet?  I was reminded of this thread by Kate Bradbury's recent two minute Radio4 Tweet of the Day spot on swifts and swift boxes.  She even plays their calls out of her window hoping to attract them.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0029yp8 Coincidentally, last week I came across a planning condition attached to the permission (24/AP/3592) granted to the old Melbourne Grove GP premises, that they install "no less than four bee bricks."  They're specifically for so-called solitary bees, who seem to be regarded as equally busy and deserving.  Kate B. mentioned that Brighton now attaches a similar condition, requiring swift boxes in all new-builds.  Might Southwark be doing so too?  
    • For those who back up their opinions with facts go to HMRC and find the filing history of any particular shop. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...