Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi all just had a bit of info my husband works at a well know supermarket a guy there was generally talking about fraud etc my husband in converstaion mentioned to this guy that my card was cloned and that i belived it was a certain petrol station, the guy asked my husband as to which one it was, after my husband telling him, he replied and said he knew the guy who worked in the garage and what they had done in the light fitting (above the counter which was reflecting right down on the card machine) was to hang a camera up there inside the light you would not belive what the camera was holding up by ------ok none of you guessed it, it was hanging up by string and 2 bars of galaxy chocolate shame the chocolate never melted with the heat from the light, still the camera obviously recorded every thing i was doing at the time, this information was sent to a lap top i gather which was behind the counter,they also had another phone line that he would use to send the information to the card cloners, it is belived that they guy was doing about 50 cards at one time i dont know wether this means one after the other or what, he was eventually found out and all he got for doing this was the sack where is justice on these people? oh and it is belived that the petrol garage is owned by the supermarket
  • 2 weeks later...

Aha! An angry Roman dries no towels... or something.


Domitianus, it's mentioned earlier on I think, but official policy is that bank card fraud is no longer reportable direct to the police, it must be reported to the banks who will then report to the police as they see fit.


I understand from my IFA that this is due to some complicated 'against whom is the crime committed' plonker logic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But they were going to cut down a tree that had no notice on it ? Either way thank goodness people intervened. My total lack of confidence in Southwark tree dept is justified it would seem… 
    • Hopefully the confusion won’t lead to injury. 
    • To clarify a few points- I didn't just happen to be passing, I saw the workmen setting up equipment worryingly close to the tree from my front window, so put my shoes on and headed over there as quickly as possible just in case. Unfortunately they had already lopped a few branches off in the two minutes it took me to get there. Although I didn't see them attach a notice, the wording on the notice pictured above has the same terminology that they used with me - fungal brackets - so presumably it was them. I have no idea who removed the sign, or why. Also worth mentioning that they were third party contractors, carrying out work orders from the council. I'm a bit confused by the 'mistaken tree' comments, as Councillor Renata Hamvas posted on a Facebook thread that she had raised the issue with the relevant council officers, and that the response she received is that the tree does have a fungal infection. So there seems to be conflicting info there, and I'm concerned that the tree is still in danger.
    • To be fair, do we know who put the notice on the wrong tree? The people wielding chainsaws almost certainly won't be the experts  who identify  the problems with the trees? They just go along and hack down what they're told to hack down? I might be wrong, but whilst actual tree surgery needs expertise, I wouldn't have thought hacking down a whole tree did? Apart from knowing how to use a chainsaw, obviously.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...