Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm just musing on this really...and I'll possibly get moved to chat...but I just wondered whether anyone had encountered blatant discrimination or just possible bias against them because of being a parent, during interviews for jobs.


I'm pretty sure the fact of my 8 month old son counted against me during a recent job interview - they asked how I'd managed the childcare, which I didn't realise was a slightly dodgy question until after the interview and I thought about it. I wasn't desperate for the job, and it was really only a toe back in the pool of interviews, but I just wondered how people dealt with things like this and what I can expect ahead of me.

I just went back to work last month and the first thing the CEO said to me after saying hello was 'I just want to check, this is your last child isn't it, you're not going to go for number three and take more time off are you?' He said it seriously and I felt really awkward. I laughed it off but secretly wanted to punch him in the face!!


I think discrimination against working parents, especially those who want to work part time, is rife. Unfortunately most p/t workers know they typically are doing a full time job but on part time money.


I am hoping for a promotion this year. If asked in interview about juggling more job responsibility with kids I plan to say that motherhood has made me more ambitious than ever and I will sort childcare the same way that many other working parents do. I would hope they wouldn't ask beyond that.


I would actually wait for a job offer before broaching the topic of your required working hours in the day eg early start and finish. It would be hard to retract an offer just because a request for flexible working is made (as long

as you both understand the number of hours/days per week the job requires by interview stage).


There are some really family friendly employers out there. Perhaps target them when looking for a job. The public sector is very good at offering flexible working, or so I have heard.


Good luck!

It's so crap isn't it!


I remember an interview ith Alan sugar where he said he wasn't bothered if a candidate was a parent - his advice was to just say 'I have really good childcare in place, it's totally sorted' as what they are really asking is if it will be a problem for them!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprised at how many people take the 'oooh it's great it got approved, something is better than nothing' view. This is exactly Southwark council's approach, pandering to greedy developers for the absolute bare minimum of social and affordable housing. It's exactly why, under their leadership, only a fraction of social and affordable housing has been built in the borough - weirdly Mccash chose to highlight their own failures in his 'near unprecedented' (yet unbiased 😆) submission. All the objectors i have met support redevelopment, to benefit those in need of homes and the community - not change it forever. The council could and should be bolder, demand twice the social and affordable housing in these schemes, and not concede to 8 storeys of unneeded student bedsits. If it is a question of viability, publically disclose the business plan to prove how impossible it might be to turn a profit. Once the thing is built these sites can never be used for social or affordable housing. The council blows every opportunity, every time. Its pathetic. Developers admitted the scale was, in this instance, not required for viability. The student movements data seemed completely made up. The claim that 'students are taking up private rentals' was backed up with no data. There is empty student housing on denmark hill, needs to be fixed up but it's there already built. The council allows developers years to build cosy relationships with planners such that the final decision is a formality - substantiated objections are dismissed with wooly words and BS. Key meetings and consultations are scheduled deliberately to garner minimal engagement or objection. Local councillors, who we fund, ignore their constituents concerns. Those councillors that dare waiver in the predetermination are slapped down. Not very democratic. They've removed management and accountability by having no nomination agreement with any of the 'many london universities needing accommodation' - these direct lets MAKE MORE MONEY. A privately run firm will supposedly ensure everyone that those living there is actually a student and adheres to any conduct guidelines. There's no separation to residents - especially to ones on their own development. Could go on... We'll see how many of the 53 social/affordable units that we're all so happy to have approved actually get built. 
    • I am looking for 1 unit which is working for £50 cash. Thank you
    • Can’t recommend the company enough, great service. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...