Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There are values, even for EU citizens, in having

> dual nationality with the UK (although the 'best'

> nationality to have is apparently New Zealand -

> nobody seems to have anything against them and

> they get in anywhere easily).

>


Really? This is a sweeping overgeneralisation. I find most Kiwis to be very obnoxious and always have a chip on their shoulder about something (small country syndrome).

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmm, I don't think the observation was about

> whether or not Kiwis are annoying lane lover, but

> about Visa requirements.


My point exactly. Whether "nobody seems to have anything against them" is irrelevant to the ease of getting a passport. Its usually due to reciprocal rights.


And before people get upset and go off on the whole "racist" angle ... Im a Kiwi: was trying to be humourous somewhat.

Actually, my point was that Kiwi passport holders seem to get easy access through most border points, and get visas easily or in many cases not need one. There is some evidence that in hijackings Kiwi passport holders are more likely to be released, less likely to be summarily shot. Despite their (claimed) individual obnoxious-ness, as a political entity Kiwis don't seem to offend (and their participation in many 'peace-keeping' and other roles globally doesn't seem to have been noticed by terrorists).

Gee lane lover, you're really doing us Kiwis proud on this Forum. Keep up the good work.


lane lover Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Hmm, I don't think the observation was about

> > whether or not Kiwis are annoying lane lover,

> but

> > about Visa requirements.

>

> My point exactly. Whether "nobody seems to have

> anything against them" is irrelevant to the ease

> of getting a passport. Its usually due to

> reciprocal rights.

>

> And before people get upset and go off on the

> whole "racist" angle ... Im a Kiwi: was trying to

> be humourous somewhat.

Given all the different views, again, I'd speak to a professional. I don't think you have anything to worry about but everyone on here is largely speaking from their own experience (including me) which may or may not be relevant given our different nationalities and the rules that may have changed since we applied.

heheheh .thanks guys and thanks to Lady D .:D

thanks for your support .now I know i don't need to be so worry about it .i ll do what s Lady D said :)

once more .i love east dulwich forum .there is wonderful people in this area .its true what they say : Dulwich is like a community: totally true !!!!

God bless you all!!!!!

ciao :)

uncleglen and Germany ?i know the politic are good .they dont have economy problem .there is job s opportunity .if you dont like anymore to live here .i think we all have to choose what make us happy . life is too short .i think .uncleglen .do it .good luck to you .!!! :)

I don't think that legislation was created to target neighborhood chat rooms any more than anti-terrorist legislation was created to imprison accountants for poor jokes on Twitter.


I'm sure it wouldn't require guidance from the Director of Public Proescutions to see that!

It's the OISC who would be the ones to decide whether to bring charges not the DPP.


The reason it is a regulated activity though, is because of the vulnerable nature of many of the people who need help, so even if someone is well meaning, but wrong in their advice, the effect on the person heeding their advice can be significant.

That's not the case Ian. Even if you offer immigration advice for free or are a charity you must be registered. Making comments on a forum is unlikely to be a problem but it's worth pointing out because the reason giving immigration advice is illegal if not registered is because of the unique vulnerability of the people who need the advice and the disastrous effect on people's lives of incorrect advice.


See:


http://oisc.homeoffice.gov.uk/how_to_become_a_regulated_immigration_adviser/

  • 3 years later...
hi to all , just thought about this post i wrote 2 years ago!!!!!! now im process for the certificate for live in definitive in the uk .... tbh i m not in shock ...i knew at some point we will be out ...now is 9 years im here ....the process is long ,so i ll start now !!!! finger crossed for us !!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have not. Both things are true.
    • I have been thinking about it and what I have loosely come up with so far are sites and types. Sites Here, Comment is Free, the Independent, the BBC (difficult as their comments section is only ever on trivia), The Telegraph (less so but increasing), The times (rapidly increasing), New Statesman, Spectator (much less so but some increase) even the Daily Mail and UnHerd (perhaps even union platforms, agit-prop and "progressive" platforms, XR, "middle-East", Just Stop Oil, Reddit, Bluesky, Truth Social etc.) I am sure the AI will find more to cross-reference. Types Astro-turfers, single-issue obsessives (frequently overlap with Astro-turfers), floral enforcers, ideologues, political staff, hypocrites, luxury belief pushers, Igors and Renfields. The vast majority are; normal local residents a bit frustrated with something; those looking for a tradesman; or just the friendly saying hello and looking for a bit of community. Spartacus thank you. Although you should probably find something else  more interesting to occupy your time; my energy for this is rapidly deflating. It won't disappear and I will get it done (once I work out which AI and which parameters to use) but it might not happen for a while. I saw your comment on the PIP thread; you have to use your single worst day to apply. Being bravely determined not to be defeated (a quality most normal people find admirable and honourable) means your claim can easily be rejected or at least made difficult. "I will get up, I will walk to the shop, I will cook". Those are the tests you have to make clear you only ever fail at. Sorry but its the truth. I wish you good luck with it.
    • Going by tracking information they go via Croydon and East Dulwich (Peckham) sorting offices. Round my way, and I know it varies from street to street, delivery of tracked items brought by the regular postman is mostly reliable. I've noticed if there isn't a postman doing a regular round, there may be a walking postman just delivering the tracked items. 
    • Are the parcel services organised by the local sorting office? We always notice parcels delivered by the vans are delivered on time but those that come via the postie can be unpredictable and we often get a "you were not in" when no-one even attempted delivery.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...