Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you have a child at Charter ED, please would you share you impressions on how you think the school is doing in terms of organisation, supporting children to succeed, calmness of school environment, extra-curricular activities, preparation for exams. I'm thinking about secondary school applications. I know this year has been unusual but would you recommend the school to others? Thank you!

So here is my view...

My daughter has just finished year 11 and been there since year 7.

A few issues to begin re bullying and I was not happy with how school dealt with it but once a particular girl left the school, changed the dynamic of my daughters friendship group and shes been happy there ever since!

Happy daughter=Happy mum!

My daughter often says how much she enjoys school!

During covid normal timetable done online with teacher and would get a phonecall most weeks.

Of course GSCE's were different this year but the school have tried their hardest to support pupils and parents during this time. Smaller intervention classes are provided for students that may need a bit of help or to ensure they get the grades they are working towards.


My daughter is staying on at sixth form and would be happy to send my 2 other children to charter ed when that time comes for them.


The head and some other staff are sadly leaving so not sure what affect that will have but I'm sure will remain a good school!


Happy to answer any specific questions via PM.

yes, my boy has just finished year 11... it's generally been positive for him. One thing I think that worked well is the number of younger male teachers who my son found very encouraging and relateable. He has decided to stay on for 6th form as well despite having another conditional offer of another more well established sixth form. I do think that his experience was really shaped by being one of the founding cohort... it felt like those students developed strong relationships with the staff and they really know those kids. I'm not sure how it is for those in more recent years but I think the ethos is similar. Lots of good extra curricular provision - sport, art, music, language clubs, games and coding clubs and the music department it great btw.
Interested in the music department info Coach Beth. From the website it doesnt' look like Charter East has much music provision- essentially just steel pans as an extra curricular option, whereas Charter North seems to have an orchestra / ensembles. Is this not the case? I know that the music rooms are being built now, but would be interested to understand experience. We are considering Kingsdale for their music provision, so would be interested to hear about Charter ED.

Yes, they have jazz ensemble, wind band, choirs, songwriting, keyboard club .... plus individual music lessons ... it?s pretty good ... they have had lots of space for music and music classrooms .... Ms Withers built up music programme from the beginning .... my partner is a pro musician and son did play drum kit up to grade 4 level till year 9. Anyway more on music programme here - https://www.chartereastdulwich.org.uk/page/?title=Music&pid=49


I know a few kids went into the Brit school from charter Ed too...

Thank you - really appreciate you taking the time to respond.


I had seen that section of the website but it indicated that the ensembles might have been limited to strings / keyboard club and steel pans with more 'planned' which didn't sound very definite! Its good to hear there is more.


I think that one of the things that the school does need to do more generally (and probably not just Charter) is make sure its website is as up to date as possible given that we have been in a position where parents can't visit potential schools with children for so long, it means the reliance placed on the website is greater than it was previously!

  • 2 months later...

Hi there, now it's Sep, can I ask any parents with children at East Dulwich Charter school how it is going?

I am looking at senior schools for next year.

I know that the North Charter has it's outstanding ofsted - not that it's all about that - but is Charter East Dulwich the same standard?

And more importantly, are the new year sevens enjoying it?

Thank you

I'm not in the market for looking at schools any longer (time flies!) but I find it amazing that the most recent Ofsted inspection at Charter N Dulwich was 2009. The exemption for outstanding schools is peculiar, although I think maybe coming to an end.
I don't have a child at Charter East nor at Charter North; however by talking to other parents I don't think is on par with Charter North; academically and in terms of dealing with issues Charter North is quite efficient; I believe it is not the same at Charter East; however I believe things will improve with the new Head Teacher.
  • 2 weeks later...
I would recommend Charter East Dulwich, especially having seen their friends go off to different schools and being able to compare experiences. One thing to note though, wherever they go, if they go with a few of their friends they tend to be happy whatever!
  • 2 weeks later...

A personal experience here of East, but with only one kid at secondary, no insight into other schools with which to honestly compare first hand knowledge.


We have had a kid at Charter East since September 2020, so with Covid, their experience has not been normal, irrespective of the school they attend.


Charter East and its teachers have done an amazing job though at maintaining a decent education throughout, in our experience, given the unique circumstances.


My biggest grumble is discipline, or lack of, which is a lifetime away from the Primary experience. I understand this issue has been exacerbated by lockdown for many kids, so is unlikely to be isolated to this school. So the teachers are having to clamp down in an extremely ruthless approach to try to instill a collective understanding in the pupils of what is right and wrong, how to behave in class, how to respect others adults and each other etc

Sad it?s needed and this causes stress to our kid, who we understand is well behaved, but many other pupils are struggling and can be quite disruptive.


As noted above, the Head of Chsrter North is now head of both schools. Many of the teachers at East came from North but with this change in leadership, I would expect to see more alignment in their approaches to all disciplines of teaching and school environment.


The teachers are very approachable. This was a key concern for us in the transition from primary - how remote everything suddenly could become versus primary. But we can, and are encouraged, to make direct contact with teachers, especially their tutor, and routinely get very quick, considered, appreciative replies.


It?s a brand new school building so it doesn?t suffer from years of underfunded maintenance issues or lack of equipment. The facilities really are brilliant and only getting better, as the remaining structures are built and sports areas complete.


What would our kid?s experience have been like at Charter North or anywhere else? We really don?t know and never will. So many elements affect a kid?s happiness, especially as they go the through puberty!


Reality is, we are blessed in East Dulwich to often deludedly think we have a choice of school for our kid. They are all decent schools. But in truth, there is little choice, unless you live in the absurd sweet spot overlap between Charter North and Charter East?s catchment.


Best advice I can give - you should sssume you kid is going to the closest school. Accept that and embrace it, cause it?s the choice with the most likely outcome of the process. This also means their friends will be local too, which helps with forming friendships at this key age in life. They can walk to school together, come home together from the first weeks.


Second advice - despite what I?ve just said, make sure you fill those 6 choices on the form, which ironically will likely involve putting schools far from home, otherwise the choice may be taken out of your hands.


All in all, Charter East is not perfect but I don?t expect anywhere is - It?s a South London comprehensive. So despite a few grumbles, it?s bloody good and if you live close to it, I?d recommend you stop overthinking it, cause it was meant to be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • "They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. " This simply isn't true. Global issues all play their own parts (as they do with other countries) but the UK govt had  been especially abject for years. Improvements could not be made with them in power. That's not to say everything is all roses when they go To claim parties shouldn't try and sell themselves in an election is absurd - but if labour did overpromise or dig into specifics (which they partly couldn't because they didn't have their hands on the books) then we live in a country where a population and media is happy to punch on them and relect the shabby last govt I mean if any argument I made was supported by some posters I would rethink it but thats just me
    • They just gave woolly and opaque policies on the basis of "we will not increase tax for working people" and then could not clearly define what a working person is. They sold everyone, directly or indirectly, on the notion that Covid, the energy crisis and the war in Ukraine had nothing to do with the sorry state of the UK and that it was 14 years of Tory rule and Truss' nightmare budget that was the source of all the country's woes. the moment they got in they lent in to the notion that change will be slow due to global challenges. The electorate are impatient and Labour were always going to have a huge job to keep people onside and bought in to the (long) journey the country is on to any sort of recovery. Their first 100 days should have been about solidifying the electorate's support for the journey but instead they have lurched from one own-goal to another and I think significantly distanced themselves from the electorate as they have behaved just like the Tories in many aspects of leadership (access to donors, clothing gate). Throw in spin on the £22bn gap (of which around £9bn was based on their own decisions), Winter Fuel payments ending and the attack on farmers (the very definition of working people) and it has been an utter disaster. They have a massive perceptual problem and seem incapable of delivering crisp messages that the people can get behind. Listening to members of the government trying to explain the intricacies and details of much of the aforementioned challenges is utterly painful to watch and people shut off after a couple of sentences. In opposition you can get away with soundbites and when you get scrutinised you can bridge to "14 years of hurt" and "we're not them" and people will buy it. When you're in the hot seat those things sounds hollow and suggest you don't have the answers and people will turn on you very quickly. It is in everyone's interests that they get it right because with a Tory party chasing the far-right vote because of Reform and Reform picking up disillusioned main political party voters then the alternative is really scary. Of course, we also have the threat from within the Labour party itself as if things don't go well for Starmer & co we could find Labour turning on itself.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...