Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,


A friend and I will be driving to Exeter this weekend. Just wondering if it is better to trek across London to get on M4 or is it possible to connect with M4 somewhere along M3. Or is it better staying on M3, A303 etc.


If anyone has any other routes or ideas do shout.


Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/287242-driving-to-exeter-best-route/
Share on other sites

Play it by ear and use Waze to keep checking the fastest route. Usually M4 is quickest, occasionally A3 to A303 is better but it gets really congested especially in summer. Going late on Friday or very early Saturday are your best bets. The last two trips I did to the West Country on a Friday afternoon it took me as long to get from ED to the M4 as it did from there to Bath.

Alex is right. M4 then M5 is normally quickest so that?s the way to go - and I would say: regardless of what Waze says when you are heading off.

Parts of the A303 are single-carriageway so if there?s a problem, it?s likely to be a serious one.


Early Saturday morning is the best time to go. The start of the M4 is just 11 miles from here so if you beat the traffic, it shouldn?t take more than 45 mins to be on the motorway.

The M4 has a 50/60 speed limit currently from Heathrow to Reading - but it?s still the best way to go.


Have a great trip.

I use to study at Exeter Uni and always preferred the M3 A303 as it is a much more scenic route, stonehenge, pig farm etc. Also less miles than M4 M5. However, when we had young children I use to go M4 M5 as there are plenty of stops but it is just long boring motorway. More miles too.
We've just driven down to Dorset and trusted Waze directing us to the m4 to then go m25, m3 - absolute nightmare, best part of 2 hours to get to the m25 (at which point we were further from our destination than home) and a crazy route through back streets of Chelsea. I think my instinctive route of south circular to clapham then a3, m25, m3 would have been much quicker. This was lunchtime on a Friday.

I?ve driven there many many times. I used to prefer to get to Wandsworth, then M3/ 303 and head down there that way.

(I live in Sevenoaks now, only 10 mins from the M25 which has greatly improved my work travels)


The motorway is often tempting, but ultimately it?s a ball ache, way too many miles.


But it?s timing that does it. I do a lot of events and festivals for work. I?ve never left and thought ?I wish I hadn?t left so early? but I have regretted leaving late. Leaving late is for amateurs. Nothing better than actually being on the road at 5:00am.


However once with a friend who had this crazy ?I?m going to be late? thing going on (it?s a genuine condition I since discovered) we left so early for Holyhead in Anglesey North Wales, that we actually woke the lady up who owned the B&B, much to her annoyance.

?You?ve travelled from London?!, I?ve not even started breakfast yet!?


Best of luck, have a safe journey.

Go during the quietest times. IF you need to drive go through central London - Vauxhall Bridge avoids the congestion charge, then M40, and onto the M4 via Maidenhead. In quiet times the A303 is a lovely route.


If you don't need to drive train is preferential, faster and less hassle. Fares are expensive at the moment, I assume due to a restricted service. But when train travel returns to something near normal savings can help cover car hire, Uber and the like the other end.


Full economic cost of driving the close to 400 mile return is around ?180, this is based on whole life costs, and doesn't discount the sunk costs (buying, taxing and insuring the vehicle)

M40 runs almost parallel to M4 for a short while. You go through central London, staying on the ring road to Victoria, round Hyde Park corner, down Bayswater and follow the signs for Oxford/M40/A40 and the like.


Elevated section of the A40, out at Shepherds Bush staying on the A40, M40 after Park Royal (this is all the same road effectively) and around High Wycombe take the A404 that takes you South to join the M4.


The advantages of this are avoiding the South Circular, which can be very busy, avoiding the A4, which can be similarly bad going through London, and the early sections of the M4 which are often very busy.


The A40 can get congested around Shepherds Bush but will tend to clear by Perivale.


I've long since been fed up of taking an hour or sometimes two to get out of London, so either go at very quiet times if I need to drive or take the train. I used to drive a lot with work in the 90s so got a taxi driver's knowledge of some of the main routes. Things change of course, but it was also pretty congested then.


Others will have alternatives for getting to the A40 or A4, but for example around Earls Court it can be horrendous.

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ah ha ,got it! That's really kind of you to give

> so much detail .It sounds a good route .


This isn?t the 90?s anymore. That driving route above is nostalgic to say the least.


Avoid Earls Court, Sheperds Bush and such likes, avoid Park Royal. Avoid that whole area. Avoid motorway speed restrictions on the M4


My business is a distribution business, we avoid those areas in 2021

Still use that route, but very occasionally as I try not to drive. I think that you have now advised not to use any route through London. So out down the A2 to the M25 and round then? Or the other way round the South Circ, via Woolwich Ferry (when it runs) and through NE London.


I have family that managed to go the wrong way round the North Circ to get to here.


Just teasing of course, all dependent on the time of travel but when not too crazy M40 is a good route on my limited experience.

Having lived in/near both Exeter and Reading for several years, I would take Exeter over Reading all day long


I do think Exeter has become much more homogenised and dull over the last 10-15 years - but it will always be the place I saw Bill Hicks twice. And at that time there was much more of a buzz about the place. It's never going to be "a scene" but I like it and it's location

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you for clarifying, James. So why would anybody want to take this on as a franchise if it is staying in this building? If it is now to be a sub office, does that mean that much of  the space could be used as a different kind of business altogether, with just part of it being used as a sub Post Office? Because if it is all to remain solely for Post Office business, (albeit as a sub Post Office it won't be providing all the services which it currently does) I can't see who would want to take it over? If it isn't profitable as a Crown office, how could it be  profitable running just as a sub office, even if staff are being paid less and it's opening for longer hours? Because presumably all the other overheads such as rent will remain the same?
    • Girobank was genuinely innovative, regarding the addressed customer base (significantly the previously unbanked) - but this would have been an ideally outsourced operation to an existing bank which already had the operational systems (and the regulatory experts) to manage a bank for someone else at marginal cost. The Post Office - when you consider the issues over the Horizon software - never originally designed by ICL/ Fujitsu for the application it ran - is a very good reason why the Post Office being involved in banking was long-term a bad idea.  To get back to the topic of this thread, the Horizon debacle is still not over (the software system is still in place) - most of the wrongly penalised sub-postmasters are still out of pocket - I'm not sure I would be leaping to take on the franchise being offered in Lordship Lane.
    • Otherwise in Bellenden Road are brilliant! They’ve made me stage dresses, restructured vintage finds and are working on remodelling my late brothers huntsman tweed suit for my modern husband! Not cheap and rents have meant they are moving premises at mo.
    • Penguin, I broadly agree, except that the Girobank was a genuinely innovative and successful operation. It’s rather ironic that after all these years we are now back to banking at the Post Office due to all the bank branch closures.  I agree that the roots of the problem go back further than 2012 (?), when the PO and RM were separated so RM could be sold. I’m willing to blame Peter Mandelson, Margaret Thatcher or even Keith Joseph. But none of them will be standing for the local council, hoping to make capital out of the possible closure of Lordship Lane PO, as if they are in no way responsible. The Lib Dems can’t be let off the hook that easily.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...