Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Atila the gooner wrote:Barclays in my experience are rubbish at most things.


That is where we part company atila, Barclays are brilliant at charging for absolutely everything, for making it as difficult as possible to get your own money out of their clutches, and for trying to get hold of anyone of value to discuss your account problems.

only one way to get around it, have two cards. I have a switch/maestro for my current account and very rarely use it. i actually use a solo card for any transactions basically transferring cash onto the solo account, so that if the card is ever cloned theres only ever ?100-200 on it anyway
  • 3 weeks later...

I don't buy petrol or buy using debit card on the interweb or use internet banking (I use telephone banking), and my debit card has never been compromised in 20 years.


My company credit card was one of thousands compromised in the last Fasthosts debacle (thousands of customer details stolen) - HSBC rang to tell me before any loss occurred (they were clearly working their way through a list of hundreds of their own customers), then I had to get my card cancelled and another reissued, which was a pain as I was travelling at the time.


It makes sense not to store CC details on websites: if it's a large organisation, they'll have good defences and data protection but will be a major target for worldwide thieves 24/7. If they're small, their security and data protection may not be sufficient.

Someone took ?1,500 out on my cards - Eurostar to Paris, trip on the London Eye for 4, shopping spree in Mango all within 48 hours. Fortunatly I was living in Alaska at the time and FirstDirect knew this, so when I called in a panic they were really helpful and I was fully refunded within a week
  • 2 weeks later...

Scotslass, any ideas where your CC details were taken?


FD are generally very good although I noticed that last month they'd actually tried to defraud me on my CC statement.


I'd paid of the balance in full before the final date, yet a charge for interest appeared on the following statement. When I called to query it they said that there was a computer error and they were looking into it. Strange I thought. If I hadn't checked my statement I would've just paid the new balance and heard nothing from FD?!


If you use FD Visa I'd recommend you check your last statement.

Will get on and check the Visa as well.


Don't know how they cloned the card - got told they had used a card to withdraw cash in Germany!! Only ever seem to use it in Sainsburys or Somerfield so completely baffled how they managed it.


On another side to this, when I spoke to FD last night they put me on hold to go through to their Fraud Dept and ended up talking to someone in India. Found this out when I started asking questions that she didn't have answers too and got told 'Madam if you listen to me I am telling you the information'!! My response "but the information is not related to my question" (6)

My card was cloned at a certain ED petrol station a while back, and then used for a spending spree in Egypt. Thankfully RBS noticed before I did, and the money was refunded immediately. Needless to say that petrol station no longer receives our patronage, unless we're totally desperate and have cash!

Got a phone call from my Natwest bank the other day (they had to try twice because i thought it was a scam) to ask whether i had been using my card in United Arab Emirates.... which i hadnt been. Luckily, the criminal in question was declined twice from using the card, which is lucky. My card was canceled and i received a new one the next day.

Natwest are brilliant with some things it seems!


Anyway... ive never been to the Texaco garage...but it worries me that if this place is culpable then why is nobody aware/its shut down? seems all very casual to me.

OK folks here's the real deal: Banks cancel cards (even while you're on holiday!) to protect themselves and merchants, not you. You're not responsible for the fraud, which is why you always get your money back (eventually). The banks are responsible for wearing the debt temporarily and eventually the merchant that authorised the fraudulent transaction will wear the cost.


If the merchant (i.e. petrol station) wants to stop this kind of crap happening they will make sure their infrastructure is secure and they don't have dodgy employees swapping out their POS kit for modified versions that skim cards. They'll also make sure their CCTV camera's don't point at the POS device so PIN details can't be captured by the employees with access to the CCTV kit.


The police don't want to know about it because it would be a big waste of resource for something that would return them little reward. These operations are international and it would take massive cross-border cooperation to yield any sort of reward. The bottom line is that the merchants needs to get their houses in order, or they will end up paying the bill. Not the bank, and most importantly not you. I agree that the banks should refund your money to your account more quickly, as in most cases it will certainly not be your fault, however that's the only real issue for the consumer here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @first mate not aware of any either. Found this relating to 23-24..  https://services.southwark.gov.uk/southwark-creates/funding/cultural-celebrations-fund?chapter=4 
    • Do we still get 50+ outdoor community events per year? All the ones round here seem to have been cancelled, like the Christmas Cracker and the summer equivalent and the Small Business Saturday event etc.  Even on the Southwark Presents page the only events in East Dulwich in the foreseeable future are non-council events organised by other people. https://www.southwark.gov.uk/southwark-presents?event_price=All&localgov_event_locality[0]=239&date_min=&date_max=&search=&page=2
    • @CPR DaveWe are talking about Lambeth Council, not Southwark, but I agree. It will be interesting to see if Lambeth fill part of that space with another hire out to a private events company.  As to the idea that what is gained financially from hiring out Peckham Rye Park is a good trade off, does not account for long-term damage to the park and the loss of access to the community for a month at least, in the best summer months where trees and shrubs are in full bloom and animals are birthing or rearing youngsters. For the Council to claim they are 'green' when they allow this is hypocrisy at its finest. @Northern Star Thanks, so they say. I'd love to see a list of these high quality free events and what they entail. I am not aware of any high quality free events in and around ED. Stand to be corrected though. Crikey, seems like they cannot even let Lordship Lane have Christmas lights this year.   
    • Regarding Gala fees: https://services.southwark.gov.uk/assets/attach/280615/GALA-2024-and-one-stage-shows-stakeholder-consultation-findings-report.pdf‘ ‘’The decision to host large/major-scale commercial (ticketed) events in Southwark was taken in 2017, deemed necessary in order to raise enough revenue to offset the running costs of the Events service, which supports the delivery of 50+ outdoor community events per year, and in order to continue to fund a range of high quality, free events across Southwark through the Cultural Celebrations Fund grants programme.’’
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...