Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The programme showed up the lack of any vision from Paddick and Johnson. Simply saying you are going to sort out London's problems, with little of idea of how to do it, is pathetic.


I think Paddick's rather cute in a sort of ex-copper way and none other the candidates would be seen with their tops off in a nightclub. I just think there is some other role for him outside of party politics. He seems straightkjacketed by having to toe the party line and comes across as wooden.


Boris a buffoon. No matter how much the papers try to big him up. He would be a disaster.


I thought this was Paxman at his best.

Have just watched it


Paddick seems a bit too reactionary to me - willing to expose the loopholes in the policy making of others but with ill-defined stances himself in many areas. The areas in which he's strong minded seem to be the areas which could do with a little discussion and moderation.


All of the negative points that this thread has highlighted about Boris were amply demonstrated, Paxman using his patented technique of bullishly handing out just enough rope.


For me, it's a one horse race.

so who do we vote for then? I want to vote but there are no real options. Green party could be a good option but as someone mentioned having someone whose every move has to be agreed by a commitee as the Green party does, it kind of dilutes decision making. Also there is the fear that if I vote Green, Boris will get in.

I do find Boris funny but also agree his bumbling loveability is an act and I certainly dont want him to be in a position of any power or influence. Someone smart and reasonable tell me who to vote for! (I think that pretty much means you Sean eheheh)

Alan Dale Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think a sensible vote would be one that ensures

> our next mayor doesn't describe black people as

> picanninies.


So you could vote for the man that calls a Jewish journalist no better than a concentration camp guard.

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Dale Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think a sensible vote would be one that

> ensures

> > our next mayor doesn't describe black people as

> > picanninies.

>

> So you could vote for the man that calls a Jewish

> journalist no better than a concentration camp

> guard.


Come off it MM. I've read enough of your posts on the forum to know you're not that silly to take that story at face value. Firstly, Ken was steaming drunk and we all say daft things then. Secondly, he didn't know the reporter was Jewish - how would you (unless he wears a kippah on paparazzi detail)? And thirdly, Ken was referring to the fact that the reporter worked for Associated Newspapers, sympathisers of the Nazi regime in the 30s, and so therefore he was no better than a camp guard with the "just following orders" excuse.


It wasn't the cleverest thing to come out with but it doesn't really compare to the rather unpleasant undertones in the Johnson "picaninies" furore. In the article in question, Johnson mocked Tony Blair's brief visits to world troublespots, acting as "SuperTony", bringing peace to the world while the UK deteriorated; Blair would arrive as "the tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon smiles to see the big white chief", just as "it is said the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth, partly because it supplies her with regular cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies".


Frankly I find that a lot more unpleasant and not far short of thinly veiled racism.

Ken is drunk on power. He thinks he can do what he wants, is profligate with his cash and is a crony magnet par excellence. Boris will be on his best behaviour because his Tory betters will need him to produce results so that they can oust Brown and co in a few year's time. Boris for Mayor! Nero

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>> >

> Come off it MM. I've read enough of your posts on

> the forum to know you're not that silly to take

> that story at face value. Firstly, Ken was

> steaming drunk and we all say daft things then.

> Secondly, he didn't know the reporter was Jewish -

> how would you (unless he wears a kippah on

> paparazzi detail)? And thirdly, Ken was referring

> to the fact that the reporter worked for

> Associated Newspapers, sympathisers of the Nazi

> regime in the 30s, and so therefore he was no

> better than a camp guard with the "just following

> orders" excuse.

>

> It wasn't the cleverest thing to come out with but

> it doesn't really compare to the rather unpleasant

> undertones in the Johnson "picaninies" furore. In

> the article in question, Johnson mocked Tony

> Blair's brief visits to world troublespots, acting

> as "SuperTony", bringing peace to the world while

> the UK deteriorated; Blair would arrive as "the

> tribal warriors will all break out in watermelon

> smiles to see the big white chief", just as "it is

> said the Queen has come to love the Commonwealth,

> partly because it supplies her with regular

> cheering crowds of flag-waving piccaninnies".

>

> Frankly I find that a lot more unpleasant and not

> far short of thinly veiled racism.



I wouldn't even say it was thinly veiled.


BTW - Although Ken's words where perhaps ill chosen, surely the sentiment was fair enough? Isn't it analaogous to saying a black person is capable of racism etc ? I understand that in the immediate aftermath of the remark, Ken was both lauded AND condemned by members of London's Jewish community.

Ok folks, let's deconstruct what Boris said. He's alluding to unsavoury old-world values and words to satirise Blair and the Queen. He is not racist, but he's referring to racism. So Boris is not racist. He's a loundmouth, but that's what politicians are. Ken is not good for London anymore. The GLA needs a good shake-up, otherwise it will end up like the GLC. Nero

tinagwee Wrote:

-- Also there is the fear

> that if I vote Green, Boris will get in.

>

As I understand it (sorry I don't have the correct terminology to hand - its a bit early for me), you have 2 votes, so if you vote Greens first and Ken second, then you'll not be voting for Boris.

I have detials of 7 people in London who will not be voting. I try not to vote, it only encourages these parasites, but I am willing to spend a day trundling about and vote in these 7 peoples names in any way I like


Whats it worth for Snorky to vote for your favoured candidate ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The long empty site at the top of Lordship Lane by the Library is now a cute little bar and restaurant -  Victus and Bibo.  We had a few beers there on Saturday night and it was very welcoming.    Not noticed this when passed today - so used to it being  closed. When the original restaurant (Moulin) closed down, the new owners said they were going to have a new restaurant after modernising the premises. This was around 10 years ago!.
    • Premier Inn or Travel Lodge. Social Housing with genuine affordable rents. 
    • Not sure why air quality came into discussion on this thread.  There are a few houses on the opposite side of the road closish to the South Circ (they all have longish front gardens).  The low level blocks of flats are set a fair way from the roads (LL and Dulwich Common).  A few other houses are on the opposite side of the road going towards Forest Hill.  It's not a densely populated area.  As said, pollutant emissions from motor vehicles have reduced due to tougher standards, for nitrogen oxides particularly since the VW cheating scandal with test procedures now far closer to the real world and can no longer be got round. The Mayor should also be congratulated for extending the ULEZ.  People tend to think about the outer boroughs, but previously the boundary was within the North and South Circs so any old vehicle could use these roads. Anyway, just pointing out.  Not that material to  the Grove Tavern thread.  You could have similar concerns about air pollution for any place on the south Circ including parks, and other recreational facilities which can be found along Dulwich common.
    • But there are loads of flats next to it, and loads of houses opposite it? What would you call " not many people"?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...