Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We live in a house divided into 2 ,subsidence work carried out in past .


Each flat has a 50% share of the freehold so we are freeholders and leaseholders .


When we bought the property over 20 years ago our mortgage company were keen that there should be continuity of insurance cover so we accepted the current policy .This has always been charged via a brokers .


The cost is incredibly high -over ?800 for our flat alone .


My attempts to find cheaper quotes have never been sucessful because of the subsidence.


I can't see the point of our brokers .In answer to my request to see copies of alternative quotes they replied


"All of our renewals once they are received, if higher than the standard increase due to index linking and insurer rates will be taken to market. If a policy also has not been taken to market in the last 3 years, it is also standard protocol to do so to ensure premium remains competitive"


I've no idea what what an insurer rate is nor whether the policy was overpriced back a million years ago .


What should I do ? I certainly dont see the point of the brokers or feel that they are getting us a good deal ?

I am in a similar situation. Victorian property built around 1860, three flats, underpinned in 1992. I now have structural survey to send to brokers. Cost about ?400.00 but well worth the expense

I have tried a number of brokers in the last few days and this broker has offered the lowest quote so far.


Adrian Flux 0800 369 8590. Suggest giving them a call

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...