Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At the moment my local Facebook groups (including the other East Dulwich Forum, East Dulwich Mums, SE23 Mums etc) are full of shared posts warning of attempted child abductions in south London. I think there have been maybe 5 or 6 conversations started in the last week. Is this actually happening and if so why isn't it in the news? I'm inclined to believe this is a case of people sharing "news" that they haven't actually verified in any way. But who am I to know. Can anyone share any light?
East Dulwich Mums is my group and I did cite that it should be taken with a pinch of salt since there is no evidence that these attempted abdication took place. Furthermore none took place in Dulwich hence I turned off commenting on group. As for the FB EDF, nothing is monitored on that group.

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thick people quite often share posts on Facebook

> about child abductions that are completely false,

> but they dont have the intelligence to

> analyse/research where the story has come from and

> consider that it may not be true. People kind of

> enjoy being outraged and letting others know about

> it.

>

> Its likely utter nonsense, and if you believe it,

> well im afraid you cant be too clever either.



This isn't politics or culture wars we're talking about....its child abduction...there isn't 'another side to the story'...its child abduction.....I sincerely doubt even the perennially outraged would try to manufacture outrage about such a topic.


As it happens, our friends were in the park when a woman came up to them screaming about her son being missing. Turns out they managed to find him as he was leaving the park with a man who had offered the boy 'duck food' to feed the ducks. The bloke managed to scamper off. So while I may have heard that second hand....Im inclined to believe that my friends wouldn't concoct 'outrage' over such a thing for kicks....

Many many years ago on this forum, someone posted about an attempted child abduction in the area


At the time I was inclined to pooh-pooh it as there hand't been any official reports anywhere, and something as horrific as that would surely have made the papers/local news rather than say-so on a local forum - and I posted exactly that


I was talking absolute nonsense - it was a very real incident and the people involved really really don't need to hear randos claiming it's all made up.

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thick people quite often share posts on Facebook

> about child abductions that are completely false,

> but they dont have the intelligence to

> analyse/research where the story has come from and

> consider that it may not be true. People kind of

> enjoy being outraged and letting others know about

> it.

>

> Its likely utter nonsense, and if you believe it,

> well im afraid you cant be too clever either.



How?s your search for your pub party going?

notimpressed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thick people quite often share posts on Facebook

> about child abductions that are completely false,

> but they dont have the intelligence to

> analyse/research where the story has come from and

> consider that it may not be true. People kind of

> enjoy being outraged and letting others know about

> it.

>

> Its likely utter nonsense, and if you believe it,

> well im afraid you cant be too clever either.


Thick people don?t know how to use an apostrophe too.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> notimpressed Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Thick people quite often share posts on

> Facebook

> > about child abductions that are completely

> false,

> > but they dont have the intelligence to

> > analyse/research where the story has come from

> and

> > consider that it may not be true. People kind

> of

> > enjoy being outraged and letting others know

> about

> > it.

> >

> > Its likely utter nonsense, and if you believe

> it,

> > well im afraid you cant be too clever either.

>

> Thick people don?t know how to use an apostrophe

> too.


Was it wrong of me to chuckle at this? ;-)

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Was it wrong of me to chuckle at this? ;-)


I remember the clowns in white vans that were rumoured to be everywhere once (was there some truth in it or not)


But if someone especially a child complains you have to investigate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
    • This link mau already have been posted but if not olease aign & share this petition - https://www.change.org/p/stop-the-closure-of-east-dulwich-post-office
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...