Jump to content

Recommended Posts

UNLESS you opt out. If you don?t want your data to be shared outside the NHS, you have to fill in this form and take it to your GP before 23rd June.


See FT today: ?England?s NHS is preparing to scrape the medical histories of 55m patients, including sensitive information on mental and sexual health, criminal records and abuse, into a database it will share with third parties.?

Note there are *two* opt outs, one is the national level and one is the GP level.


https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-collections/general-practice-data-for-planning-and-research#opting-out


National Data Opt out - https://your-data-matters.service.nhs.uk/.

GP Level - See https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/our-work/keeping-patient-data-safe/how-we-look-after-your-health-and-care-information/your-information-choices/opting-out-of-sharing-your-confidential-patient-information#type-1-opt-out-medical-records-held-at-your-gp-practice. You have to provide a form directly to your GP, this cannot currently be done online (I assume because the practice has to decide to send the data or not).


A few links on the NHS site seem to have changed this morning, so these may or may not continue to work. Perhaps there are moves afoot to publicise this better or even move the opt out to online. Surely the last thing GP practices need is millions of paper forms to process.

Thank you so much for alerting us to this. Forms printed off!




FredCasa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> UNLESS you opt out. If you don?t want your data to

> be shared outside the NHS, you have to fill in

> this form and take it to your GP before 23rd June.

>

>

> See FT today: ?England?s NHS is preparing to

> scrape the medical histories of 55m patients,

> including sensitive information on mental and

> sexual health, criminal records and abuse, into a

> database it will share with third parties.?

I?ve done no research into this but by ?your data? I think they mean using annomynized stats on health against various variables and data mining it to increase insights into health, demographics datamining for insight to improve health provision and service, Rather than your actual personal information being passed on.


It?s actually the sort of thing the NHS should be doing using it unique and massive data to look for patterns, say finding correlation between disease and conditions that we didn?t know about. A good thing.

Reading the privacy notice a number of thing raises question marks, notably that an emergency (pandemic)supersedes elements of that notice...quite what that means not sure but would like to be clearer.


It seems that unless you opt out you are giving over rather more than just anonymised data, your name, address, DOB.


Data is held in the cloud in secure servers in the EEC. Again, not sure of implications of that.


If you use the 119 service to book or change jabs a phone advisory seems to suggest you give permission to whoever is running that service (NHS subcontractor) to "access your health records".


No doubt all intentions here are as pure as the driven snow with only the interests of health and social research and public interest at the heart.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/30/the-guardian-view-on-medical-records-nhs-data-grab-needs-explaining


Think this deserves much greater scrutiny. NHS patient records are a data goldmine...It is stated patient records would not be used solely for commercial purposes. That says it all.

First Mate wrote on May 26, 05:48PM


> It seems that unless you opt out

> you are giving over rather more

> than just anonymised data, your name,

> address, DOB.


What's your source for your information that name, address and DOB may be passed on?


Does your "rather more than" refer to "just anonymised data, your name, address, DOB"? If so, what is the "more"?

ianr, suggest you read articles, as linked to in other posts, above. They explain implications/concerns better than I.


ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> First Mate wrote on May 26, 05:48PM

>

> > It seems that unless you opt out

> > you are giving over rather more

> > than just anonymised data, your name,

> > address, DOB.

>

> What's your source for your information that name,

> address and DOB may be passed on?

>

> Does your "rather more than" refer to "just

> anonymised data, your name, address, DOB"? If so,

> what is the "more"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The country didn't "hate Corbyn". Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer, if memory serves, and it was only due to our weird electoral system that they didn't win the previous election. Any hatred of Corbyn was whipped up by the right wing press. The Labour Party has completely lost its way. It doesn't seem to know what it stands for any more, and its members have deserted it in droves. Including me. Anyway, this is probably for the lounge, not being directly relevant to the subject of the thread.
    • Agree but Labour made a far worse start and the wheels seem to be falling off spectacularly quickly. Whatever the reason for Reeves' tears it made the markets very jittery and now there is real doubt about how much longer she will last but Starmer cannot afford to lose her - I think they are both toast and the likes of Rayner and Streeting will be licking their chops. A bit like what is happening with Cllr McAsh locally the internal politics of the Labour party always are the real driver of policy, direction and execution and for a government with such a huge majority to be struggling so much so early is really worrying. We should all be very scared because this is paving the way for Reform and a leadership challenge or swing to the farther-left within Labour would be an unmitigated disaster - we had another term of Boris because the country hated Corbyn and his far-left ideology and the far-left Labour may see a leadership challenge as their only feasible way to take the reigns - a bit like Cllr McAsh and his Momentum buddies.
    • He has been around for a few months now and looks so sad and unhappy   ,he is coming into the gardens at the top end of  Upland and  Dunstans Roads .Just wondered if he is owned as he is not neutered and keeps getting into fights with cats .
    • Starting with Brexit, all the way through to drunken lock down parties, and then finishing on Liz Truss' 'mini budget', I would say it was fairly disastrous from start to finish.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...