Jump to content

Recommended Posts

UNLESS you opt out. If you don?t want your data to be shared outside the NHS, you have to fill in this form and take it to your GP before 23rd June.


See FT today: ?England?s NHS is preparing to scrape the medical histories of 55m patients, including sensitive information on mental and sexual health, criminal records and abuse, into a database it will share with third parties.?

Note there are *two* opt outs, one is the national level and one is the GP level.


https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-collections/general-practice-data-for-planning-and-research#opting-out


National Data Opt out - https://your-data-matters.service.nhs.uk/.

GP Level - See https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/our-work/keeping-patient-data-safe/how-we-look-after-your-health-and-care-information/your-information-choices/opting-out-of-sharing-your-confidential-patient-information#type-1-opt-out-medical-records-held-at-your-gp-practice. You have to provide a form directly to your GP, this cannot currently be done online (I assume because the practice has to decide to send the data or not).


A few links on the NHS site seem to have changed this morning, so these may or may not continue to work. Perhaps there are moves afoot to publicise this better or even move the opt out to online. Surely the last thing GP practices need is millions of paper forms to process.

Thank you so much for alerting us to this. Forms printed off!




FredCasa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> UNLESS you opt out. If you don?t want your data to

> be shared outside the NHS, you have to fill in

> this form and take it to your GP before 23rd June.

>

>

> See FT today: ?England?s NHS is preparing to

> scrape the medical histories of 55m patients,

> including sensitive information on mental and

> sexual health, criminal records and abuse, into a

> database it will share with third parties.?

I?ve done no research into this but by ?your data? I think they mean using annomynized stats on health against various variables and data mining it to increase insights into health, demographics datamining for insight to improve health provision and service, Rather than your actual personal information being passed on.


It?s actually the sort of thing the NHS should be doing using it unique and massive data to look for patterns, say finding correlation between disease and conditions that we didn?t know about. A good thing.

Reading the privacy notice a number of thing raises question marks, notably that an emergency (pandemic)supersedes elements of that notice...quite what that means not sure but would like to be clearer.


It seems that unless you opt out you are giving over rather more than just anonymised data, your name, address, DOB.


Data is held in the cloud in secure servers in the EEC. Again, not sure of implications of that.


If you use the 119 service to book or change jabs a phone advisory seems to suggest you give permission to whoever is running that service (NHS subcontractor) to "access your health records".


No doubt all intentions here are as pure as the driven snow with only the interests of health and social research and public interest at the heart.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/may/30/the-guardian-view-on-medical-records-nhs-data-grab-needs-explaining


Think this deserves much greater scrutiny. NHS patient records are a data goldmine...It is stated patient records would not be used solely for commercial purposes. That says it all.

First Mate wrote on May 26, 05:48PM


> It seems that unless you opt out

> you are giving over rather more

> than just anonymised data, your name,

> address, DOB.


What's your source for your information that name, address and DOB may be passed on?


Does your "rather more than" refer to "just anonymised data, your name, address, DOB"? If so, what is the "more"?

ianr, suggest you read articles, as linked to in other posts, above. They explain implications/concerns better than I.


ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> First Mate wrote on May 26, 05:48PM

>

> > It seems that unless you opt out

> > you are giving over rather more

> > than just anonymised data, your name,

> > address, DOB.

>

> What's your source for your information that name,

> address and DOB may be passed on?

>

> Does your "rather more than" refer to "just

> anonymised data, your name, address, DOB"? If so,

> what is the "more"?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...