Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our house has a carriage arch ie a drive underneath our bedroom to get through to the house behind us. With this empty space underneath us, the room is quite often freezing and it acts as an echo chamber for noise coming from the house next door (and the car driving through. We want to add thermal and sound insulation. We can either remove all of the furniture, take up the floorboards and try and add the insulation from inside, but this feels like a big job.


So I was wondering if we could insulate from the outside ie affix some form of insulation panels to the ?ceiling? of the driveway.


Has anyone done anything like this? Any thoughts on product eg Rockwool maybe? And/ or any thoughts on insulation experts?


Thanks!

I don't know if I would do external. You say that taking up floorboards etc would be a bigger job than trying to do something externally but I don't actually think that's the case--it could end up being more work in the future trying to fix something you tried but then didn't work. I think taking up floorboards and putting in some really decent RWA45 rockwool is a good way to go. The problem trying to do external is keeping it dry. How would you do that without effectively building a proper ceiling and then waterproofing it? Suppose you could just have a go with some celotex or whatever and see what happens...

The sound you're hearing is probably coming through the structure (structure borne) as opposed to flanking (through open windows/doors) or impact, and it's difficult to eliminate if the property hasn't been built to prevent that from happening. The noise is probably reverberating up through your walls as well as the floor, so insulating the floor might not make a huge difference (recording studios get round this by building a box within a box, but that's way OTT for a domestic situation unless you thought it worthwhile).

However, you should get some benefit on heat loss side of things.

As an aside, have you considered putting in a bigger radiator? When the original was installed the installer might not have taken into account the room has an external soffit, so simply getting a bigger rad could help in that respect.


A photo of the arch would've been really useful, so in lieu of that I'm guessing that there's a recessed concrete soffit beyond the arch, similar to this (couldn't find a pic showing a curved arch)...


images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRkaqfpyv8bJRsK5Oe04muye-ByKrdEN3buwA&usqp=CAU


If this is the case then in theory it wouldn't be difficult to form a new floating soffit incorporating some sound/thermal insulation, finished with a smooth exterior board painted out. But it needs to be done professionally, probably with a vapour barrier and maybe even vents to prevent condensation build-up. And once you get into stuff like that, Building Control need to be informed and approval sought.

You will also need the permission of the management company/freeholder or the owner of the other property(ies) if it's a share of the freehold, to carry out the works.

If the arch is continuous i.e. no recessed soffit, then I'd forget about it, as visually it would look a mess.


I also think it would be less hassle to do add some insulation internally. You don't mention lifting up carpets, just moving furniture and lifting floorboards. So it may be a simple case of putting down a really thick heavy duty underlay and carpet, sealing any gaps e.g. between floorboards ands skirtings, with mastic.

Personally, I'd try that first, along with a new rad, and see if that works before attempting lifting floorbaords etc

If not or you already have a carpet, then obviously you will need to lift it and the floorboards and run some insulation between floor joists, this can be the Rockwool type or rigid boards. There are lots of DIY videos on YouTube how to do both...

I very much doubt that EWI in a sheltered arch will need a vapour barrier let alone vents since it'll be 100% shielded from rain. If you are leasehold then I wouldn't bother with this solution.


As said, the easiest option is get your floorboards up.


If sound bothers you, then fill around 75% with high density mineral wool with air gap at top. Mechanically couple the joists with noggins at regular intervals, couple joist ends to brickwork securly with steel brackets and chemical fixing, discard the floorboards and top with a layer of 18mm ply on top well screwed down to joists. Basically mass and mechanically coupling the building copmonents are your friend in lowering the resonant frequency and reducing noise. Resonant frequency = 1/ (mass x area) ... larger the mass and coupled area, lower the resonant frequency and lower the noise.


If you want thermal insulation then 100% fill with PIR insulation (celotex/kingspan etc)


Pay attention to air tightness to stop windwash, squirty foam does the job.


Most builders are blaggers and won't have a clue about any of this.

redpost Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I very much doubt that EWI in a sheltered arch

> will need a vapour barrier let alone vents since

> it'll be 100% shielded from rain.


Because of the lack of detail/photos I was trying to cover all possibilities.

Despite the sheltered aspect, interstitial condensation could be a problem as condensation doesn't just form in areas exposed to rain.

I'm sure the OP is wise enough that if they decided to investigate an EWI solution they will contact the technical help line of a company like Rockwool/Kingspan etc, and get them to spec up a solution...

Wow! Cheers all, really appreciated. Diablo, yes, it?s an arch broadly like the pic you posted. I am the freeholder so that bit is less problematic at least. Condensation both in the room above the arch and on the inner brickwork of the arch is a real problem simply because of the cold so anything that adds to issues will need pondering. Will contemplate feasibility of taking everything out of the room to do from within. And yeah, appreciate we?ll be getting the sound/vibration through the building structure as well as via floor....but every little must help!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have been using Andy for many years for decorating and general handyman duties. He always does a great job, is very friendly and his prices are competitive. Highly recommend.
    • Money has to be raised in order to slow the almost terminal decline of public services bought on through years of neglect under the last government. There is no way to raise taxes that does not have some negative impacts / trade offs. But if we want public services and infrastructure that work then raise taxes we must.  Personally I'm glad that she is has gone some way to narrowing the inheritance loop hole which was being used by rich individuals (who are not farmers) to avoid tax. She's slightly rebalanced the burden away from the young, putting it more on wealthier pensioners (who let's face it, have been disproportionately protected for many, many years). And the NICs increase, whilst undoubtedly inflationary, won't be directly passed on (some will, some will likely be absorbed by companies); it's better than raising it on employees, which would have done more to depress growth. Overall, I think she's sailed a prudent course through very choppy waters. The electorate needs to get serious... you can't have European style services and US levels of tax. Borrowing for tax cuts, Truss style, it is is not. Of course the elephant in the room (growing ever larger now Trump is in office and threatening tariffs) is our relationship with the EU. If we want better growth, we need a closer relationship with our nearest and largest trading block. We will at some point have to review tax on transport more radically (as we see greater up take of electric vehicles). The most economically rational system would be one of dynamic road pricing. But politically, very difficult to do
    • Labour was right not to increase fuel duty - it's not just motorists it affects, but goods transport. Fuel goes up, inflation goes up. Inflation will go up now anyway, and growth will stagnate, because businesses will pass the employee NIC hikes onto customers.  I think farms should be exempt from the 20% IHT. I don't know any rich famers, only ones who work their fingers to the bone. But it's in their blood and taking that, often multi-generation, legacy out of the family is heart-breaking. Many work to such low yields, and yet they'll often still bring a lamb to the vet, even if the fees are more than the lamb's life (or death) is worth. Food security should be made a top priority in this country. And, even tho the tax is only for farms over £1m, that's probably not much when you add it all up. I think every incentive should be given to young people who want to take up the mantle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...