Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I received this email from One Dulwich.

For your information & includes consultation & contact emails



One Dulwich


Your Action Needed

Dear all,


Six key issues that need your urgent action this week:


1) Register for the May review


If you haven?t already done so, please register for the May review of the current Dulwich LTNs.


Our report on ?Who closed Dulwich Village junction??, which looks at an earlier review in 2019, raises serious concerns about the Council?s ability to run a public consultation. The process was poor, data was misrepresented, and there is evidence of bias and selective reporting. You can read our News report here.


We hope the new review will be fair and transparent. When the Council finally publishes its plans, we?ll analyse the structure of the consultation ? and any published data ? and share our thoughts with you, in case this is useful before you fill in your response.


2) Where has all the traffic gone?


A good visual summary of local traffic displacement can be seen here. Please watch and share.


3) Urgent: your written objections by 16 May


Now is the time to make your formal written objections to the Streetspace ETOs on Burbage Road, Dulwich Village, Townley Road and Turney Road that came into force on 16 November. You might want to question the 24/7 closures that gave rise to them, or object to the length and/or timing of the restrictions, safety concerns, or the way these measures have displaced traffic. Please send your objections to traffic.orders@southwark.gov.uk quoting the reference TMO2021-EXP16_LSP Dulwich 2. As always, you can copy in the decision-maker catherine.rose@southwark.gov.uk, highways@southwark.gov.uk and, if you?d like to, onedulwich@gmail.com.


4) The Dulwich Society?s future policy


We hear that the Dulwich Society ? regularly consulted by the Council on all Dulwich issues ? will hold a Special General Meeting on 28 June to discuss its policy on travel and environment. How will the Society position its response to the review in the light of this discussion? If you?re a Dulwich Society member (annual fee ?10 per household), please put this date in your diary: more details from secretary@dulwichsociety.com.


5) Posters and leaflets


We have teamed up with the Dulwich Alliance to produce leaflets (see www.dulwichalliance.org) and posters objecting to the current road closures. If you?d like to display a poster in your window, please contact dulwichalliance@gmail.com for more details.


6) Please contribute to the fighting fund


As part of the Dulwich Alliance, One Dulwich is delighted to see that donations to the fighting fund to produce campaign leaflets and posters, and to progress legal advice, have now reached ?12,000. Thank you! Please continue to spread the word.


Contact us with queries, offers of help, or new information, via onedulwich@gmail.com.


Best wishes and thanks again for your support,


The One Dulwich Team


SUPPORT ONE DULWICH

https://www.onedulwich.uk


One Dulwich

All Zones

London

United Kingdom

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/284366-help-needed-please/
Share on other sites

Despite other communications claiming that they really are terribly committed to reducing pollution and congestion, and their deep-seated interest in BAME communities, when it comes to actions it wants people to take: it's all about reopening roads to cars and opposing every aspect of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods.


With their Ulster Says No approach to compromise and their repurposing of "All Lives Matter" to "All Streets Matter", One Dulwich is not doing itself many favours.

Everyone?s entitled to an opinion, but Dogkennelhillbilly it?d take you 30 seconds on the One Dulwich website to see that compromise is exactly what they?re after - ?One Dulwich supports area-wide timed restrictions (after consultation with the local community on hours of restriction, access, and location of entry/exit points) as a more proportionate, and more socially just, solution.?


And again disagree if you like, but I know a number of prominent One Dulwich members and can only observe that IMO they are indeed primarily driven by social justice. Many are Labour voters (possibly LibDem at the margins) and are totally furious that a Labour-led council could have enacted such a socially regressive, ill thought out policy and done it in such a partisan manner with such poor democratic accountability. Many actually live on the affluent DV roads that ?benefit? from reduced traffic (i.e. at the expense of poorer neighbours) and are far from regular car-drivers but are genuinely looking beyond narrow self-interest. Trying to defame them with bizarre references to Ulster politicians is hilariously misjudged.

@Sparrowhawk


Whatever their make up, One Dulwich's action plan is totally ineffective.


It looks like a wishy washy compromise strategy generated by a committee of intellectuals who are afraid to come to a decision. No plan , no leadership and no hope.


They seem to be all jaw-jaw and there is no evidence out on the street of any outcome.

Nothing in the media.

Nothing on display.

Nothing in terms of activism.


Compare what they have done with what other Burroughs have done and they are nowhere near.


No plan, no leadership and no hope.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...